Andy Chambers wrote:
Hi Kenny,
Is the gui-geometry in cells what powers layout in cello? Would it be worth somehow getting celtk to use this or should I just bite the bullet and jump to cello?
I just realized I got lost in there somewhere: the Tcl examples /should/ port OK, with caveat that PLACE will require a little new glue and yes I still may have done an imperfect job of Just Exposing Tcl/Tk. Tk pack is pretty powerful, and even the place mechanism has some cute bells and whistles. It is not clear to me how much gui-geometry offers you over those unless you are really planning on having some fun with dynamic shifting GUIs, in which case yeah. I think it comes down to what I said last time: if you can do without the widgets, cello is great fun. A bear to build the first time, but folks here should be able to help. I believe Frank left a roadmap somewhere, at least in a cells-devel mailing. (We should add it to the doc in cvs, I htink.) kt