5 May
2007
5 May
'07
10:04 p.m.
Frank Goenninger wrote:
You do - yet there is another approach I adopted from Kenny:
Thanks! Now I have to spend some time examining stuff you've written that I've never heard of before (such as with-integrity...). :-) Also, there doesn't seem to be anything named "defobserver" in the latest asdf-installable cells. Has this become def-c-output perhaps?
Anyway, I was kind of trying to avoid sub-classing because I have lots of switches. I'll have to re-think that decision.