Ramarren wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vukovic@gmail.com wrote:
I have downloaded cells2.0 from cliki.
As far as I can tell cells 2.0 is not linked from cliki, although it is from the homepage. In any case, it is really old. The latest original version is in CVS and is marked as 3.0. I believe it has improved data integrity for certain cases (well, according to http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/c0afdb359ffed6a7 in this case "has improved" means "adds" but supposedly it usually works anyway).
Ah, 3 added integrity? Well, when I added it I did it all in one go, so it should be pretty solid on those edge cases that broke 2.
Not sure what 4 added, then. maybe the flattening of recursion into a fifo queue of changes?
Yes, 2 worked for an incredibly long time, but it does have a hole closed by 3 so who needs the uncertainty?
kt
On the mailing list, I see another branch mentioned (Ramarren). I gather that as long as I don't care about GTK, that should not be an issue.
My branch of Cells themselves is just a number of cosmetic fixes for Cells 3.0 (well, as it is in CVS it doesn't work on anything except Lispworks, but those are cosmetic-level changes anyway). The commit list is here: http://github.com/Ramarren/cells/commits/master , mostly it make SBCL emit less warnings and improves support for other implementations.
Regards, Jakub Higersberger
cells-devel site list cells-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel