Laziz Foo wrote:
Thanks! So I have lost track, is this Cells-Gtk3 (with Cells 3 Inside) or Oldskool Cells-Gtk?
This is cells-gtk3. Oldschool works out of the box, but I wanted the cairo stuff.
And you got help from someone other than Peter H so it sounds as if CG3 has taken hold. Cool.
So it is a battle to death between Cello and Cells-Gtk3 for GUI supremacy? Awesome.
It's a case of scratching my own itch-- every stock/futures charting app I've used (both windows and linux) are inadequate in ways that are important to me; might as well write my own.
Your propaganda has convinced me that somehow I would have greenspunned Cells, or given up on the project entirely while chasing state issues around.
Ah, good, the spam is working. Yes, the paradigm is inevitable so one ends up automating dataflow one way or another. Over on c.l.l someone is explaining how Qt's signals/slots eliminate the need for Cells. Whatever. I just like the mounting evidence that dataflow is inevitable. I would add it to the prior art in the Cells manifesto but it is getting ridiculous, I might just edit that down to "It's everywhere."
Cells3 integrity clearly is to be preferred, but I miss the good old days of Cells Classic when I just SETfed here and SETFed there and let the data converge /eventually/ on correct values. :)
In one of my previous go-rounds w/ lisp, I used cells-classic to investigate globex tick data. C.l.l. cells reactions/concerns do not match the reality of downloading it and doing something useful quickly, despite the lack of documentation.
Damn. I'll have to find some other way to keep Cells to myself. perhaps it is time to start seeding CVS with insidious bugs...
It also occurs to me that if the 'yobbos' really wanted to popularize lisp, they'd find some way to use cells-*tk to create a Visual Studio-like thingy that would enable any CTO's nephew to say, "Oh lisp-- yeah, I do that."
It would not help, I think. Programming is receding into the background (or India or Russia or China) of culture. Once was a time lotsa people wired up electronics. The career is still there for the odd weirdo, but -- well, it's like shade-tree auto mechanics: gone along with the simple technology.
Happy hacking.
kt
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Kenny Tilton kennytilton@optonline.net wrote:
Laziz Foo wrote:
Thanks! So I have lost track, is this Cells-Gtk3 (with Cells 3 Inside) or Oldskool Cells-Gtk?
This is cells-gtk3. Oldschool works out of the box, but I wanted the cairo stuff.
And you got help from someone other than Peter H so it sounds as if CG3 has taken hold. Cool.
So it is a battle to death between Cello and Cells-Gtk3 for GUI supremacy? Awesome.
I'm afraid I won't be able to push cells-gtk as much in the near future. Now that I have a job and a new apartment, Real Life keeps me quite busy.
So 1:0 for cello ...
It also occurs to me that if the 'yobbos' really wanted to popularize lisp, they'd find some way to use cells-*tk to create a Visual Studio-like thingy that would enable any CTO's nephew to say, "Oh lisp-- yeah, I do that."
It would not help, I think. Programming is receding into the background (or India or Russia or China) of culture. Once was a time lotsa people wired up electronics. The career is still there for the odd weirdo, but -- well, it's like shade-tree auto mechanics: gone along with the simple technology.
I'd rather say it is like manufacturing: Programming has become a commodity rather than an art, so the big players produce where it is cheapest. So yes, the point-and-click low-barriers code writing will be gone soon, along with making sneakers, plastic toys, and printed circuit boards.
But -- every now and then a handful of smart people realizes that there is more to programming than typing code, and then they create something great.
Those people don't care about shiny IDEs, tho.
Peter