Done, please see the pull requests #39 on github.
Best regards, - Anton
26.02.2014, 22:47, "Luís Oliveira" loliveira@common-lisp.net:
Hello Anton,
For some reason I missed this email. Found it on Gmane for some random reason. Sorry for the late reply!
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
Possible simple fix is to introduce new condition cffi-grovel:grovel-error and shadow cl:error in the cffi-grovel package, instead writing an own cff-givel:error function with the same prototype as cl:error, but with the condition type it signals will be cffi-grovel:grovel-error.
If you agree to this proposal I am willing to provide a patch.
I think it's cleaner to define a GROVEL-ERROR function rather than shadow ERROR. Other than that, your proposal makes perfect sense. Please do send a pull request!
Thanks,
-- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/