2006/10/13, Luís Oliveira luismbo@gmail.com:
On 10/12/06, James Bielman jamesjb@haytonsystems.com wrote:
IIRC, the SBCL maintainers preferred to reserve the right to change SB-RT incompatibly, as its really intended for testing of contribs, not for user code.
Ah, right. The only problem now is that ECL's RT package's name is SB-RT and the only nickname it has is RT so we can't use it conveniently anyway.
This is no longer true as of CVS. Otherwise I would not have been able to run the tests using ECL's RT.
Juanjo