thanks for your answer. i try Verrazano (from darcs repository), but i've got a problem with it too i make a past to resume this : http://paste.lisp.org/display/49805
2007/10/25, Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai@gmail.com:
So the Verrazano project has been resurrected? Does it handle methods that
recently i needed a few bindings and worked on it for a while. the core deserves a rewrite to use a non-sxml parser, preferably a parser that emits clos objects and use method dispatch to emit stuff. i'd even use contextl for hyper-customizability.
it's long towards the end of my todo list... i'd grab a better xml parser (most probably cxml, also see http://lichteblau.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-data-structure-for-xml.html ) and rewrite the internals of verrazano. it's not a big work, but needs time and better understanding of c/c++ then i have offhand.
i'll write up a TODO in the repo.
but in spite of that, take a look at these example bindings, especially the oracle one and the opengl one:
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=fetter-verrazano;a=tr...
are both overloaded and overridden? Is it possible to subclass a C++ class
as i've seen there was some minimal work on overloaded methods, but it's bitrotted since then. as i understand it, a proper ABI abstraction layer is completely missing from verrazano-runtime.
in Lisp via Verrazano? I started to develop support for both these features in Swig; maybe I should switch to Verrazano.
i really think you should. verrazano is superior in two aspects: 1) it's based on gcc-xml, and 2) it's written in lisp... :)
sorry for the cross-post,
-- attila _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel