25 Apr
2010
25 Apr
'10
3:57 p.m.
In the file cffi-ecl.lisp of I find the equivalence table
(:char :byte "char") (:unsigned-char :unsigned-byte "unsigned char")
that associates, for the ECL port, a byte with the CFFI :char type. Is this intended per-specification? Why not using ECL's :char type, which might be more than one byte if the compiler and operating system expect so?
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://tream.dreamhosters.com