19 Apr
2012
19 Apr
'12
1:37 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Stelian Ionescu sionescu@cddr.org wrote:
IMO the change to mem-aref is bad and will break a lot of code. Until now the contract of mem-aref was that it received a pointer to an array of the referenced type and returned a pointer offset into the array. The fact that it now returns a list is a gratuitous change, with no utility. If we actually want these semantics(not sure about it), it should be mem-aptr to implement them
If it's not too difficult, can you extract a self-contained test case that has been broken?
Cheers,
--
Luís Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/