![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2f7ec3b37425cf4e077e7ef376e451be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
1 Feb
2006
1 Feb
'06
5:24 p.m.
But this makes me wonder if another abstraction, say DEFBITFIELD would be useful. Something like: The more expressive, the better IMHO.
(defbitfield name (0 sym1 sym2 ...) Never thought about it. But who says bitfields will soon say "arbitrary width". Not everything is a single bit.
Regards, Jörg Höhle.