![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/086e97d1b2c1a9bdb3c9cfb70f0d0dd8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
10 Jan
2012
10 Jan
'12
7:12 p.m.
On 01/10/2012 04:28 AM, Luís Oliveira wrote:
I am interested in both short answer - as a library author, how do you think CFFI test suite should be marked if only expected failures present - OK or FAIL? Depends on the use case. In terms of notifications, I would rather be warned about new failures. In terms of a summary, I'd like to see the results broken down into OK, FAIL, KNOWNFAIL.
How about OK, FAIL, UNEXPECTEDOK, and EXPECTEDFAIL? You have to consider the the cases where one expects a failure but it passes too. If those are too long, use the Bayes approach: FP and FN (false-positive and false-negative) Jeff