18 Sep
2005
18 Sep
'05
9:21 p.m.
On 18/set/2005, at 16:59, Kenny Tilton wrote:
The CMUCL way confuses run time with compile time. Lisp is all about dynamism, in this case not attempting to resolve a binding until it is invoked.
Well, come to think of it, that'll work if you use the interpreter. Both on CMUCL and CLISP. Is that acceptable?
--
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt