12 Oct
2006
12 Oct
'06
10:41 p.m.
On 10/12/06, James Bielman jamesjb@haytonsystems.com wrote:
IIRC, the SBCL maintainers preferred to reserve the right to change SB-RT incompatibly, as its really intended for testing of contribs, not for user code.
Ah, right. The only problem now is that ECL's RT package's name is SB-RT and the only nickname it has is RT so we can't use it conveniently anyway.
--
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/