12 Oct
2006
12 Oct
'06
10:41 p.m.
On 10/12/06, James Bielman <jamesjb@haytonsystems.com> wrote:
IIRC, the SBCL maintainers preferred to reserve the right to change SB-RT incompatibly, as its really intended for testing of contribs, not for user code.
Ah, right. The only problem now is that ECL's RT package's name is SB-RT and the only nickname it has is RT so we can't use it conveniently anyway. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/