11 Jan
2012
11 Jan
'12
3 p.m.
On 1/11/12 Jan 11 -1:16 AM, Daniel Herring wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Daniel Herring wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Jeff Cunningham wrote:
How about OK, FAIL, UNEXPECTEDOK, and EXPECTEDFAIL?
FWIW, here's one established set of terms: PASS, FAIL, UNRESOLVED, UNTESTED, UNSUPPORTED (XPASS and XFAIL are not in POSIX; change test polarity if desired) http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/manual/x47.html#posix
I guess I'd be inclined to say "too bad for POSIX" and add XPASS and XFAIL....
The reason that I'd be willing to flout (or "extend and extinguish" ;->) the standard is that there is no obvious advantage to POSIX compliance in this case that would compensate for the loss in information.
cheers, r