On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Liam Healy <
lnp@healy.washington.dc.us> wrote:
> I see this is a simple change to the function call interface: naming
> the struct means call by value; if you want to call by reference, use
> :pointer.
> We can even make a warning if you call by reference with
> the struct name and don't have FSBV loaded (remember we are going to
> keep this a separate system so that users don't have to load libffi if
> they don't need call by value).
That's nicer, but fsbv might be loaded for some other reason and thus
silently break existing code.
> So this is an incompatible change to
> the call interface, essentially revoking CFFI's prior generosity in
> allowing structure name instead of :pointer. I definitely don't like
> the idea of making different defcstructs, that will be too confusing
> and a kludge.
Just to be clear, the older defcstruct would become deprecated,
removed from the user manual, etc.