I've extended with-foreign-slots to return slot pointers in this fashion (basically I took this macro with minor modifications but named it with-foreign-slots).
Liam
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Liam Healy lnp@healy.washington.dc.uswrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Chris Bagley chris.bagley@gmail.comwrote:
I ran into similar issues to Willem and have taken to using the following macro:
(defmacro with-foreign-slots* ((vars ptr type) &body body) "Create local symbol macros for each var in VARS to reference foreign slots in PTR of TYPE. Similar to WITH-SLOTS. Each var can be of the form: slot-name - in which case slot-name will be bound to the value of the slot or: (:pointer slot-name) - in which case slot-name will be bound to the pointer to that slot." (let ((ptr-var (gensym "PTR"))) `(let ((,ptr-var ,ptr)) (symbol-macrolet ,(loop :for var :in vars :collect (if (listp var) (if (eq (first var) :pointer) `(,(second var) (foreign-slot-pointer ,ptr-var ',type ',(second var))) (error "Malformed var names must be:~%name~% -or- ~%(:pointer name)")) `(,var (foreign-slot-value ,ptr-var ',type ',var)))) ,@body))))
This, for me, balances the needs quite nicely and feels in line with the style of cffi. Thoughts or modifications?
I had thought about doing something like this when looking into Willem's problems. I like it, but I think the "*" in the name is unnecessary. It is upwardly compatible with the current with-foreign-slots, isn't it? That is, if it were to replace with-foreign-slots, it would expand correctly for current usage (to values). I think we should replace that macro with this.
Liam