6 Nov
2012
6 Nov
'12
11:08 a.m.
On 06/11/2012, at 9:21 AM, Luís Oliveira wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
If that's the case, what about defining a new operation, ASDF:GROVEL-OP, that takes a fasl file and performs PROCESS-GROVEL-FILE on it? I.e., when you PERFORM a GROVEL-OP, you get a new lisp file? I.e., there would be a lisp-file as the sole OUTPUT-FILE of the grovel-op.
This sounds perfect. Thanks Robert!
Mark, do you feel like taking a stab at this?
Sure, I will have a go.
Mark