Re: [cffi-devel] cffi-grovel: signal GROVEL-ERROR instead of CL:SIMPLE-ERROR

Hello Anton,

For some reason I missed this email. Found it on Gmane for some random reason. Sorry for the late reply!

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:

Possible simple fix is to introduce new condition cffi-grovel:grovel-error and shadow cl:error in the cffi-grovel package, instead writing an own cff-givel:error function with the same prototype as cl:error, but with the condition type it signals will be cffi-grovel:grovel-error.

If you agree to this proposal I am willing to provide a patch.

I think it's cleaner to define a GROVEL-ERROR function rather than shadow ERROR. Other than that, your proposal makes perfect sense. Please do send a pull request!

Thanks,