Re: [cffi-devel] Inline expansions for pointer operations

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll@googlemail.com wrote:

...

One advantage of the previous definition is that passing non-pointers to POINTER-EQ would (I assume) signal an error. What do you think?

If this is the intended behavior in all platforms then I will have to think about something else for the inline expansion as well -- is it ok if the error check is removed for low safety settings?

Yes, I would say so. This is sort of stuff that the CFFI-SYS spec should be careful about but isn't yet. I've just added a handful of tests for this sort of stuff.