Re: Re: Re: [cffi-devel] More patches for ECL

On 10/12/06, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll jjgarcia@users.sourceforge.net wrote:

Why does a change prefixed by #+ecl / #-ecl affect other implementations?

Sorry, I wasn't clear. The particular change that breaks Lispworks is this one:

- (let ((rtest::*compile-tests* compiled) + (let ((rt::*compile-tests* compiled)

Also you are forcing people to install a version of RT which is basically the one with ECL, though ours output more useful information, such as the message of a condition when the output is one.

Good point. James, do you remember why we've resisted to use other versions of RT so far? :-)

Anyway, when I find time I will finish the support for statically compiled callbacks.

Cool, thanks!