On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Luís Oliveira <loliveira@common-lisp.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Liam Healy <lnp@healy.washington.dc.us> wrote:
Indeed, I first approached it this way. But the length needs to be calculated somewhere, and making it here has the benefit of preserving the arglist of translate-into-foreign-memory which is parallel to translate-to-foreign by design. If you think this works, I will commit it.
Looking at the actual problem we're trying to solve, I think we want to specialise expand-to-foreign-dyn-indirect rather than translate-into-foreign-memory. Does that make sense?
-- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/
Yes. How does this look? (defmethod expand-to-foreign-dyn-indirect (value var body (type foreign-string-type)) (expand-to-foreign-dyn value var body type)) Liam