Thanks for the response. FSBV has grown a bit since I sent that email, and I agree with the principals you put in the bug report; i.e., if it's integrated correctly into CFFI it shouldn't require (any?) extra macros. That is why I wrote the macros to be as close to the CFFI form. In order to avoid extra macros while maintaining a separate system, it might be possible to provide a hook in CFFI and then have FSBV bind that hook if it's loaded.
BTW you might want to correct FSVB -> FSBV in the bug report and tags (stands for "by value") otherwise searches might miss it.
Liam
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Luís Oliveira luismbo@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Liam,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Liam Healy lnp@healy.washington.dc.us wrote:
If the keepers of CFFI are interested, I would be happy for it to be included in CFFI. In the meantime, it can be found here: http://repo.or.cz/w/fsbv.git
This would indeed be nice to have in CFFI! I've registered this wishlist item in https://bugs.launchpad.net/cffi/+bug/622247.
-- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/