On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Attila Lendvai
<attila.lendvai@gmail.com> wrote:
>> let me voice my support here for making cffi better even by
>> introducing some non 100% backwards compatible changes.
>
> These changes *should* be backwards compatible though. :-)
oh well.
but still, you get the idea... :)
It may be surprising, but I've heard no objections yet. I do imagine people are going to gripe about the flood of style warnings (once this version gets into quicklisp). It will be interesting to see if code maintainers rewrite their code.
Liam