On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Chris Bagley
<chris.bagley@gmail.com> wrote:
I ran into similar issues to Willem and have taken to using the following macro:
I had thought about doing something like this when looking into Willem's problems. I like it, but I think the "*" in the name is unnecessary. It is upwardly compatible with the current with-foreign-slots, isn't it? That is, if it were to replace with-foreign-slots, it would expand correctly for current usage (to values). I think we should replace that macro with this.
Liam