Luís Oliveira wrote:

Other platforms where SBCL doesn't use the linkage table yet will fail this test as well. So I've marked this test as expected when *features* match (and sbcl (not linkage-table)).

Thank's. Next error: Test CFFI-TESTS::DEFCFUN.UNDEFINED failed Form: (PROGN (EVAL '(CFFI:DEFCFUN ("undefined_foreign_function" CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION) :VOID)) (COMPILE 'CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION) T) Expected value: T Actual value: #<UNDEFINED-ALIEN-ERROR undefined_foreign_function {AAF3369}>. -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk.

Luís Oliveira wrote:

Other platforms where SBCL doesn't use the linkage table yet will fail this test as well. So I've marked this test as expected when *features* match (and sbcl (not linkage-table)).

Hmm, now (SBCL 0.9.11.3) linkage table is present: CL-USER> *features* (:ASDF :ANSI-CL :COMMON-LISP :SBCL :UNIX :SB-DOC :SB-TEST :SB-PACKAGE-LOCKS :SB-UNICODE :SB-SOURCE-LOCATIONS :IEEE-FLOATING-POINT :X86 :WIN32 :GENCGC :STACK-GROWS-DOWNWARD-NOT-UPWARD :C-STACK-IS-CONTROL-STACK :STACK-ALLOCATABLE-CLOSURES :ALIEN-CALLBACKS :LINKAGE-TABLE :OS-PROVIDES-DLOPEN :OS-PROVIDES-PUTWC) but: Test CFFI-TESTS::DEFCFUN.UNDEFINED failed Form: (PROGN (EVAL '(CFFI:DEFCFUN ("undefined_foreign_function" CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION) :VOID)) (COMPILE 'CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION) T) Expected value: T Actual value: #<UNDEFINED-ALIEN-ERROR undefined_foreign_function {A7A4631}>. Why? Thanks! -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk.