good point.&nbsp; As I've actually done that search :)&nbsp; I believe i've done the following searches:<br><br>&quot;chicago lisp&quot;<br>&quot;chicago scheme&quot;<br>&quot;chicago scheme lisp&quot;<br>&quot;illinois lisp&quot;<br>
&quot;illinois scheme&quot;<br><br>Corey<br><br>P.S.&nbsp; i'm massively into memetics too.&nbsp; Remember to talk to me about it sometime.<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">John Quigley
</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jquigley@jquigley.com">jquigley@jquigley.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Corey Sweeney wrote:
<br>&gt; I agree with this. We should have a name that's unique enough that<br>&gt; people will find us on a google search.&nbsp;&nbsp;(one of the reasons using<br>&gt; &quot;LISP&quot; would be a horrible idea :)<br><br>Consider, however, somebody Googling for a Lisp group in Chicago.&nbsp;&nbsp;Their
<br>search will likely be something similar to &quot;chicago + lisp.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;If our<br>name incorporates those two exact words, we'll be in good shape, I think.<br><br>- John Quigley<br>_______________________________________________
<br>chicago-lisp site list<br><a href="mailto:chicago-lisp@common-lisp.net">chicago-lisp@common-lisp.net</a><br><a href="http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/chicago-lisp">http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/chicago-lisp
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>((lambda (y) (y y)) (lambda (y) (y y)))