![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fed88e8dc2798851fdee8bf9c80b8e91.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
John Quigley wrote:
The way I see it, the group could also become The Chicago Lisp and:
- Programming Language Group (ala, Lambda The Ultimate) - Artificial Intelligence Group (ala, AAIA) - Functional Language Group (ala, RHS was to become?)
I'm good with names... * Chicago Lispniks * Chicago Lithpers ;-) * Chicago Area Programming Languages Group - that is, Chicago APL Group (heh) * Chicago Area Many Languages Group - that is, CAML Group (heh) * Chicago Lispy Group * Chicago Lispits * Chicago LISPers and Friends * Chicago Area LISPies et al * Chicago LISPit etc. To me, my interest in LISP has never been about AI or functional languages, etc - it was more about the capabilities of it and the programming nature of LISP. OOP on LISP has some interest, but OOP in anything but Ruby and Smalltalk has the feel of being "bolted on" rather than "integrated in" but haven't tried LISP OOP in depth yet.