On 6.08.05, René van Bevern wrote:
What's still to come: support for CL implementation registration.
Okay, I have done that now. It is not quite as useful as the
Hello! I'm sorry, I'm replying to an old post... :-D On Sat 06 Aug 2005 15:10 +0200, René van Bevern wrote: part
for Common Lisp library packages, though, since there are lots of specific things in packages for implementations.
Calling "dh_lisp sbcl" will do the following: a) install debian/sbcl.sh to usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh b) generate postinst and prerm scripts to interact with the common-lisp-controller c) nevertheless scan the package contents for ASDs to register
I used dh_lisp in the cl-rfc2388 (and I'm planning to use it also in cl-s-xml and all the other CL packages I'll deal with), because it's very useful and I don't need to care of correct link, etc. However, I'd like to be sure of what I did. Calling "dh_lisp rfc2388" will search for debian/rfc2388.sh. However, rfc2388 doesn't have any "binary" to install in /usr/lib/[cl]/bin/, so dh_lisp fails. Instead, if I call "dh_lisp" only, it correctly find my rfc2388.asd and installs it, genearting the postinst and prerm scripts. Am I correct if I understood that as the intended behaviour? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca PS, René, have you considered to apply for dh_lisp inclusion in debhelper?