24 Oct
2005
24 Oct
'05
2:53 p.m.
Hello! On Mon 24 Oct 2005 16:02 +0200, Faré wrote:
Why not have: * cl-slime, that depends on cl-slime-el and cl-swank * cl-slime-el, that contains the emacs lisp code and doesn't depend on cl-swank
I'd prefer slime/slime-el here: slime is not a library (usually called cl-...), but a real "program", but... I see no point in creating a slime-el package as AFAIK SLIME works only on Emacs. OTOH, if SLIME supports multiple swanks (and *we* support multiple swanks), the Depends could be "cl-swank | sch-swank" ;-) Just my 0.02EUR... Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca