Hello people, On Saturday 22 October 2005 00:32, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
Source: clisp Architecture: source all i386
The 'all' for clisp is rather optimistic. If you see on http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=clisp that for alpha, hppa, ia64 and sparc the build fails. The problems visible in the build logs seem pretty severe: alpha: ./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x "(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)" Cannot map memory to address 0x4000000000000 . [spvw_mmap.d:359] errno = ENOMEM: Not enough memory. ./lisp.run: Not enough memory for Lisp. hppa: ./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x "(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)" make[1]: *** [interpreted.mem] Segmentation fault ia64: ./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x "(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)" Cannot map memory to address 0x4000000000000 . [spvw_mmap.d:359] errno = EINVAL: Invalid argument. ./lisp.run: Not enough memory for Lisp. Does anybody have an idea what the cause could be? It does not look like a packaging problem, so I'm inclined to say that these architectures are not supported anymore by upstream and just drop them. Comments? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|