Re: [cl-debian] dh-lisp gains support for ECL

Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> writes: Hi Peter, first: nice to hear that CLC-integration of ECL is progressing. :-)

I assume there is a stronger connection between a ecl-generated program and the ecl version as a whole then what you would expect from the library alone.

So does it make sense to have a separate libecl package?

I really don't have deep knowledge of ECL's internals, sorry. That's why I have written the preliminary code for ECL-dependency handling in dh-lisp. libecl.so differs from "normal" libraries in at least the thing that it does not provide a SONAME (which might already make the shlibs system awkward to use in this case). I also don't know if ECL generated programs need only libecl or more. René