Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 14:29:52 +0000
From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 06:29:52 2005 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYP3H-0008Vd-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:29:52 -0800 Received: (qmail 20825 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 15:29:46 +0100 Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100) by acquagioca.it with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 15:29:46 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F3C9CC5C; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:29:13 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ITP: cl-arnesi -- small Common Lisp utilities X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:29:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87zmojjk9q.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : cl-arnesi Version : 1:20051105-1 Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it> * URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/arnesi.html * License : BSD Description : small Common Lisp utilities arnesi is a Common Lisp utility suite. It contains various "bits 'n pieces" of code. . Features: * Flow control macros - while, whichever, if-bind, etc. * A simple logging facility - kind-of/sort-of/maybe like log4j. * HTTP/HTML utilities - URL and HTML escaping * Pattern matching - fare-matcher style pattern matcher and "regular" list matcher * Accumulation - collecting and reducing macros * Cps transformer - an ad-hoc, bug ridden implementation of half of call/cc. * Decimal arithmetic - convert floats to exact rationals and vice versa with a given precision; standard rounding functions. * MOP compatibility package - The MOPP package provides the MOP's symbols on various implementations. Currently OpenMCL, CMUCL, SBCL, Lispworks and CLISP are supported. . The recommended packages add extra features: documentation via cl-qbook, test suite with cl-fiveam and add-ons for cl-ppcre. . This is the development version. ===== This is the first of a series of ITPs for Common Lisp software that is necessary as dependency for UCW [1]. As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package to the CL-Debian repository [2]. The package is linda and lintian free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [3]. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw/ [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi [3] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbLOoVAp7Xm10JmkRArZjAJ9ozHTCBA4dVtA7CBvUoev8VVqhtACfdeJ6 ZRhswz4sIzmDhbCWqx9yCq8= =MT0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337646-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:45 +0000
From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:45 2006 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4DSq-0002lX-Q4 for 337646-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:45 -0800 Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209) by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status? References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please? =20 You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20 lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul 4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w= =Ilot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--