On Wednesday 15 March 2006 23:34, René van Bevern wrote:
Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> writes:
Even with proper clc support :-)
Wonderful. Is there any conclusion about ECL binaries' dependencies against libecl.so yet? It'd be nice to have a proper dh-lisp around once ECL is accepted. :-)
Ah. According to upstream the libecl.so interface is not firmly defined at all, so he suggests to just have an ecl package that people can refer to. In effect I'm also breaking another debian rule in that the library has rpath defined :-S. Honestly I do not think we will ever see the day a 'stable' libecl comes out, the integration of ecl and libecl is just too large. So in short: make the packages depend on the exact version of ecl used to build them. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|