(PS: I sent this mail 2 1/2 hours ago and it didn't get here. Now via webmail. Sorry, if double.) Hi, I wanted to play around a bit with Gtk+ and Cairo yesterday, noticing that the latest version of clg (0.91) _seemed_ to support Cairo. Sure, there is an examples/testcairo.lisp using :cairo and :svg-cairo, but clg itself doesn't offer any Common Lisp bindings for Cairo. So, I browsed through the net and found cl-cairo, which needs cl-cffi (the Common Foreign Functions Interface). Well, I packaged the 0.91 version of clg (based on René van Bevern's work), cl-cffi and cl-cairo, because packaging them is the easiest and cleanest way to install it, I think. ;) Of course, the testcairo example still didn't want to work. Just naive to think that it really needed cl-cairo. But done work of dirty tied up packages shouldn't be for nothing, so I uploaded cl-cffi[1], deleted cl-cairo (and mailed the author of clg about the issue) and uploaded the "NMU" of clg 0.91. [2] The latter is the upstream source with RvB's debian/ directory. Only the 2nd patch in debian/patches/ is adjusted. That could mean a little less work for him, if I didn't do everything wrong. [1] http://noxa.de/~sbeyer/debian/packages/?main,any,cl-cffi http://noxa.de/~sbeyer/debian/packages/?main,src,cffi Without ITP. [2] http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~stbe-in/debian-tmp/ Source package is not lintian-clean because nmu-version-foobar. My changelog entries may be removed, it's rather inofficial. ;) Best regards, Stephan. -- Stephan Beyer, PGP 0xFCC5040F, IRC sbeyer (seebyr, bseyer) Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner