Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800 with message-id <E1EfErx-0004lh-V4@spohr.debian.org> and subject line Bug#338393: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2005 01:33:53 +0000
From liw@iki.fi Wed Nov 09 17:33:53 2005 Return-path: <liw@iki.fi> Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Ea1K5-0002VJ-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:33:53 -0800 Received: from angua.pieni.net (ip212-226-168-226.adsl.kpnqwest.fi [212.226.168.226]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C367BD7318 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:33:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from [10.10.100.16] (unknown [10.10.100.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by angua.pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757396A6EB for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:33:50 +0200 (EET) Subject: sbcl: installation fails, register-common-lisp-implementation not found From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi> To: debian bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:32:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1131586363.10112.15.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-7 Severity: serious Justification: package doesn't install without common-lisp-controller Testing sbcl with piuparts, I find that installation fails: 0m9.6s ERROR: Command failed (status=25600): "chroot /tmp/tmpUMtHi0 apt-get -y install 'sbcl'" Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Suggested packages: sbcl-common slime Recommended packages: binfmt-support The following NEW packages will be installed: sbcl 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded. Need to get 9141kB of archives. After unpacking 32.3MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://liw.iki.fi sid/main sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-7 [9141kB] Fetched 9141kB in 0s (10.8MB/s) Selecting previously deselected package sbcl. (Reading database ... 7532 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1%3a0.9.6.0-7_i386.deb) ... Setting up sbcl (0.9.6.0-7) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/sbcl.postinst: line 22: /usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-implementation: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing sbcl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: sbcl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) At first glance, this would indicate a missing dependency on common-lisp-controller, but looking at the postinst script, it seems more likely that the bug is here: if [ -x /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh ]; then /usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-implementation sbcl fi The "if" tests for the wrong file, I think. -- Crappy tools are not worth it. Find or make better ones. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 338393-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2005 11:12:10 +0000
From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Nov 24 03:12:10 2005 Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EfErx-0004lh-V4; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> To: 338393-close@bugs.debian.org X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#338393: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.55-1 Message-Id: <E1EfErx-0004lh-V4@spohr.debian.org> Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: sbcl Source-Version: 1:0.9.6.55-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 338393@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> (supplier of updated sbcl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:55:25 +0100 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.6.55-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> Description: sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL Closes: 338393 340104 Changes: sbcl (1:0.9.6.55-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Now use dh-lisp correctly. (Closes: #338393) * Removed :purify t in save-lisp-and-die on advice of upstream. (Closes: #340104) * New upstream solves infinite loop in kernel < 2.6.11 Files: 60a0e77b4d5058a03f76768e109c05b2 658 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc f3594a5f5e393d5824f64c0174aa9c0c 4298538 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz 07889d3aa46ada24ca904d10b6142424 20900 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz 4abb253d82d026eb7613ef056aace352 3989012 devel optional sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb c62e04720a82dbc04344ede2026c4046 9073836 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhZHN11ldN0tyliURAle6AKCMEiLZJskA3jVOdCrrbUoW40PbigCgmMGU j93BEXkINonpCy1Di7h66i0= =YH8m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----