
Hello! On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:37:15 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:39, Luca Capello wrote:
Basically, university/lab work are preventing me to finish the UCW debianization, and with that I mean also all the needed dependencies.
If you make the work done already available we'll try to find some time to finish it for you.
I found some time to continue... ;-) BTW, all of my work is usually available on the CL-Debian repository: http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/lcapello/ Now, the situation is the following. I compiled each package via ASDF with CMUCL, SBCL and CLisp (sid versions). - arnesi, ITP #337646 [1], updated as of today darcs - fiveam, ITP #337657 [2], updated as of today darcs, but it doesn't compile because of [3] - qbook, ITP #337666 [4], updated as of today darcs and modified the debian/control file to explain why tetex-bin is suggested - yaclml, ITP #337662 [5], updated as of today darcs - parenscript is quite ready, I need to figure out the best way to install the documents, so probably I'll file an upstream patch [6]. - UCW is on the way :-D Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please?
Moreover, I'd like to have a test-script to be sure that a fresh install of UCW (something like `apt-get install ucw-test`, with ucw-test depending on ucw) brings up a basic working system. This test-script could be then used by others on different archs, as ATM I own only an i386 :-(
I agree. Does someone with UCW experience have any ideas?
FYI, some software developed by Marco has an ASDF system defined as "test", so this is a starting point. What I was referring to as "a basic working system" is an HTTP working system ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337646 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337657 [3] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2006-January/001475.html [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337666 [5] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337662 [6] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2006-January/001469.html