Hi Sven! On Tue 30 Aug 2005 15:07 +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
I finally came around to apply your patch (to the current CVS head), I didn't test it though ;-) Thanks for the contribution!
And I should say that I'm a bit stupid, because I forgot my patch. Actually, the story took another road: people involved in packaging CL software for Debian decided to avoid Debian native packages, as you can read from the cl-debian mailing-list archive, please refer to posts [1] and [2]. As an example, the same happens to cl-rfc2388 (Debian bug [3]). Finally, I'm really sorry to have forgotten to write you back, in order to cancel in some way my patch. So, could you revert it, letting s-xml as a _non_ Debian native package, please? And please excuse me again for the confusion.
BTW, the CVS version also contains experimental XML namespace support.
I read your post to s-xml-devel and I'm planning to package a new s-xml for Debian (as I should update it to the latest Debian policy). But I'm a bit busy at university until mid-September :-( BTW, s-xml is already included in Debian testing ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/2005-June/000045.html [2] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/2005-July/000177.html [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310665