Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200 with message-id <20050922103002.GA8938@kitenet.net> and subject line er, ok has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 14:04:24 +0000
From micah@riseup.net Fri Sep 16 07:04:21 2005 Return-path: <micah@riseup.net> Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGGpB-0003tO-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574C6A31F7; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31018-38; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290BA31EF; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6D343A81F; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Micah Anderson <micah@riseup.net> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org> Message-Id: <20050916043641.D6D343A81F@pond> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 4.16 Severity: normal Tags: security Hi, I notice that in DSA-811-1[1] that common-lisp-controller has a fix for CAN-2005-2657 uploaded into stable, and the upload that is recorded as fixing this issue in unstable is for version 4.18[2]. However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on 8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect? Thanks, Micah 1. http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-811 2. "For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 4.18." -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --------------------------------------- Received: (at 328633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 10:30:07 +0000
From joey@kitenet.net Thu Sep 22 03:30:07 2005 Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIOL9-0007Nn-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:30:07 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.38.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A612D18596 for <328633-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:30:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66D2EBEEF3; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200 From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> To: 328633-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: er, ok Message-ID: <20050922103002.GA8938@kitenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: 328633-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 4.18 Maintain appeared to ignore my request, oh well. --=20 see shy jo --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMoeqd8HHehbQuO8RAmt0AKCpwPg5Bm+1i8xl7W5A0N4wFZMGHQCglQhj vNHSRwL8MWoBDofwt8AAQgo= =tVpT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--