Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> writes: Hello Luca,
Something like there's a problem in the ${misc:Depends} generated by dh-lisp?
That is right. Debian Unstable still has dh-lisp 0.5, that is completely unaware of ECL and can happend to confuse its fas files with the ones of Clisp. dh-lisp 0.6 is aware of ECL, pushes the CLC dependencies to CLC 5 and does not confuse ECL with Clisp anymore. I asked Peter to upload dh-lisp 0.6 a week ago and uploaded it to http://progn.org/~rvb/dh-lisp and had not synchronized my Darcs repository at that time, which he noticed. I don't know where the problem is hanging now. :-) dh-lisp 0.5 adds a dependency on the old CLC, while ECL has a manually added CLC dependency of higher version, which results in two dependencies on CLC. If dh-lisp 0.6 was finally uploaded ;-) ECL wouldn't need any specifica related to CL dependencies or similar things anymore. For building ECL with dh-lisp, it should also use the -d switch, so that no wrong Clisp dependency is added. If dh_lisp 0.5 finds a clisp on the system that is used to build the current ECL, it will add a false Clisp dependency. You never know what is installed on the buildds, they don't always clean everything after builds. So, getting dh-lisp 0.6 in would be a nice thing. Regards, René