[cl-debian] Updates Slime debs

Hello, I've put online a Debian repository with updated Slime debs: deb http://debian.muvara.org/debian binary/ deb-src http://debian.muvara.org/debian source/ There are two packages: slime (latest stable release) and slime-cvs (CVS snapshot). I plan to make a separated cl-swank package, too, for servers without an emacs installation. The debs derive from the ones available at: http://commonwerx.org/software/contrib/slime/deb/ They're developed and built on Ubuntu Breezy (sorry, it's the only workstation I've got ATM). Can they be useful for the cl-debian project? Is there a link with information for potential contributors? Any suggestion is encouraged and appreciated :-) Regards, alceste -- Alceste Scalas <alceste@muvara.org>

Il giorno sab, 15/10/2005 alle 11.45 +0200, Alceste Scalas ha scritto:
Is there a link with information for potential contributors?
Ok, sorry, it was easy: I've just stumbled upon http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/ Regards, alceste -- Alceste Scalas <alceste.scalas@gmx.net>

On 15.10.05, Alceste Scalas wrote: Hello Alceste,
I've put online a Debian repository with updated Slime debs:
Fairly up-to-date slime packages are also in our Darcs repositories and at http://pvaneynd.blogspot.com/2005/08/sbcl-progress.html, as well as in Debian unstable/non-free. I should probably link Peter's p.d.o repository on the cl-debian main page.
Can they be useful for the cl-debian project? Is there a link with information for potential contributors?
Well, that splitting of slime and cl-swank for a distributed system sounds interesting (to me), like it is seen in one of the videos on common-lisp.net. You can probably send your changes to our Slime repository. :-) René

Il giorno sab, 15/10/2005 alle 14.05 +0200, René van Bevern ha scritto:
Fairly up-to-date slime packages are also in our Darcs repositories
Ok, I must confess that I completely missed it and your *huge* work. Next time I will check more carefully before sending emails. I promise.
Well, that splitting of slime and cl-swank for a distributed system sounds interesting (to me), like it is seen in one of the videos on common-lisp.net. You can probably send your changes to our Slime repository. :-)
I worked on it, and I've just sent a patch to the maintainer (pvaneynd@debian.org). I can forward it here too, if needed. While making swank more common-lisp-controller-friendly, I've noticed that xref.lisp (the file that makes Slime non-free) is actually needed only when using GNU CLisp. I've tested Slime with cmucl and sbcl, and it seems to work fine even without that file. Maybe xref.lisp could be removed from Slime deb sources, thus dropping GNU CLisp support, but making the package free. Is it feasible? I can work on it and send a patch, if you think it's worth. Regards, alceste -- Alceste Scalas <alceste@muvara.org>

On Saturday 15 October 2005 20:31, Alceste Scalas wrote:
While making swank more common-lisp-controller-friendly, I've noticed that xref.lisp (the file that makes Slime non-free) is actually needed only when using GNU CLisp.
I've tested Slime with cmucl and sbcl, and it seems to work fine even without that file.
Now that is _very_ interesting. A kind of poetic justice that the _GNU_ lisp is affected :-). The other problem files: swank-ecl.lisp Could be removed too. The remainder is fluff, but the slime people should get their act together and put it under some license. ChangeLog (as this is a generated file it can be considered derivative of the others I assume) doc/Makefile HACKING NEWS PROBLEMS README So until they act for at least some of these files removing xref.lisp has little sense. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|
participants (4)
-
Alceste Scalas
-
Alceste Scalas
-
Peter Van Eynde
-
René van Bevern