New subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: marked as done (libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch)

9 Mar 2009

      Package: libsigsegv
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
touch aclocal.m4 && \
        touch configure
# autoconf's stuff for bug #466356
cp configure configure.ORG
autoconf
aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf.  If you want to use that,
you should regenerate the build system entirely.
aclocal.m4:14: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
make: *** [config.status] Error 63
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler
...
From bou
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Lhvmv-00033B-87
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:14 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LhvZu-0005RY-Mf; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:48:46 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LhvZu-0005RJ-9s	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009
   00:48:46 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LhvTo-0001zz-2x; Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> (slime for {517839})
In-Reply-To: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
References: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.12369048535013.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: >
   tags
   517839 + upstream Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade There were
   no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here.
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:14 -0000
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
...
tags 517839 + upstream
Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
...
From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:03:11 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Lhvnp-00033O-Pe
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:11 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LhvdC-00060c-7Y; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:52:10 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LhvdB-00060Q-OP	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009
   00:52:09 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LhvTc-0001we-Bc; Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.517839.B517839.12369048535031@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517839
X-Debian-PR-Package: slime
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: slime
Received: via spool by 517839-submit@bugs.debian.org
   id�17839.12369048535031          (code B ref 517839); Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000
Received: (at 517839) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 00:40:53 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 53; hammy, 151; neutral, 243;
   spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs,
   0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 
   0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA,
   HAS_BUG_NUMBER,IMPRONONCABLE_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
   autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224])	by rietz.debian.org with
   esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <luca@pca.it>)	id 1LhvQQ-0000Oj-Kg;
   Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:38:58 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from gismo.pca.it (139-205.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.0.205.139])
   by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02
   (built
   Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KGF001705SRXH00@victor.unige.ch>;
   Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 5C8C02C494; Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Christoph Egger <debian@christoph-egger.org>
CC: 517839@bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel <slime-devel@common-lisp.net>
References: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX>
Message-ID: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the
   slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already
   reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no
   subscription requnired). [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
   0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
   lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, 517839@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:12 -0000
--=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

tags 517839 + upstream
thanks

Hi Christoph!

Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue
(already reported, read below).  Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no
subscription requnired).

On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
...
Updating SLIME in testing fails on configuration. See the aptitude
output attached to this mail.
Please always set LANG=C when you provide logs, since it is difficult to
parse foreign languages ;-)

I can reproduce the bug on a clean cowbuilder chroot: first, I created
it for lenny, then installed slime together with xemacs21 and emacs22
(no errors).  After that I modified apt's sources.list to point to
testing:
=====
root@gismo:/# apt-get update
Get:1 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release.gpg [197B]
Get:2 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release [71.6kB]
Get:3 http://cdn.debian.net testing/main Packages [5533kB]
Fetched 5604kB in 11s (497kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done

root@gismo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
[...]
The following packages will be upgraded:
  aptitude base-files bash binutils cl-swank cowdancer cpio cpp cpp-4.3
  debconf debconf-i18n debianutils fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.3 gcc
  gcc-4.3 gcc-4.3-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip libc6 libc6-dev libdb4.6
  libept0 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgmp3c2 libgnutls26 libgomp1
  libice6 libmpfr1ldbl libncurses5 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libsepol1
  libsm6 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.3-dev libtasn1-3 libxapian15 libxau6
  libxaw7 mawk mktemp ncurses-base ncurses-bin pbuilder readline-common
  realpath sed slime tzdata
56 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.5MB/38.7MB of archives.
After this operation, 3084kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
[...]
=====
...
Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el...
While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el:
  !! error (("Required feature arc-mode was not provided"))
...
...
Error occurred processing slime.el: 
Required feature arc-mode was not provided
This is the problem, specific to xemacs21 and not emacs22.  The problem
is in slime.el at line 69:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
  (require 'overlay))
(require 'easymenu)
(eval-when (compile)
  (require 'arc-mode)
  (require 'apropos)
  (require 'outline)
  (require 'etags))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

This has already been reported upstream, see the discussion at

  http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2008-October/015633.html

Quoting Helmut Heller from the thread above:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote:
...
* Steven E. Harris [2008-10-27 00:21+0100] writes:
...
...
Byte-compilation doesn't work in XEmacs, though.
In general, or as a result of this change? Before my last post, I was
able to byte-compile slime.el when I commented out the `require' form,
but I concede that I didn't test the result.
It doesn't work because arc-mode.el in XEmacs provides 'archive-mode
instead of 'arc-mode.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Since on Debian we byte-compile emacsen files at installation, I do not
know how to proceed here.

Is not this a bug in XEmacs?  I would say so and thus reassign the bug
to xemacs21.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5qxYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPSfAP7BlHtMm89+ObsfNQ8XWbbQvPM
GcQITkl0/ph91CZEVk3bQ6KBBUqZHlOCnSe3XE+93Ik4BLcV749pIKQaBNYYJ5al
XzluYLfKU4fGKtOHvKgzaXbPr6nxVHvgvIpoujEydai1hpQ+2R0ciQiTHIhAIEvZ
5zZe/+mVO0wuXnXQfu0=uktn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
...
From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:12:54 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LhvxE-0003Ai-Lf
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LhvxE-0001oX-4P; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:52 +0000
Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from
   <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)	id
   1LhvxD-0001oL-Nh	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009
   01:12:51 +0000
Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)	id 1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3;
   Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
X-Dak: dak process-unchecked
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
X-Debian: DAK
X-Debian-Package: slime
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <E1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3@ries.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format:
   1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime
   cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution:
   unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca
   Capello
   <luca@pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode
   for
   Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for
   Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low
   . * debian/postinst, prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every
   Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them
   (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1:
   2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc
   90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
   f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902
   slime_20090217-2_all.deb
   7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120
   cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256:
   2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478
   slime_20090217-2.dsc
   2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693
   slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
   c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902
   slime_20090217-2_all.deb
   09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120
   cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea
   1478
   devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f
   18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
   8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional
   slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel
   optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20090217-2 (source all)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100
Source: slime
Binary: slime cl-swank
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:20090217-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Description: 
 cl-swank   - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server)
 slime      - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs
Closes: 518021
Changes: 
 slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/postinst,prerm:
     - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related
       stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc
 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc
 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
Files: 
 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc
 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL
9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb
1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/
C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU�9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Accepted:
cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
slime_20090217-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc
slime_20090217-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb
...
From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:18:48 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Lhw2w-0003DM-Q2
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Lhw2w-0002k9-6d; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:46 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1Lhw2v-0002jw-Nu	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009
   01:18:45 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LhvzO-0007jY-2J; Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 01:15:06 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420)
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.518021.D518021.123690683726888.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em@ries.debian.org>
   <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug@PPP0193985.mtu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518021
X-Debian-PR-Package: slime
X-Debian-PR-Source: slime
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:05 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1236906905-29624-0"
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Your message dated Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with
   message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em@ries.debian.org> and subject line
   Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug
   report
   #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked
   as done. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518021: marked as done (aptitude fails to purge
   slime in squeeze)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1236906905-29624-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000
with message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #518021,
regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
518021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

------------=_1236906905-29624-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2009 15:58:55 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 32; hammy, 149; neutral, 89; spammy,
	2. spammytokens:0.997-1--H*M:4011, 0.993-1--H*MI:4011
	hammytokens:0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug,
	0.000-+--H*x:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*UA:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:3.48
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests�YES_00,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,SPF_PASS,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <dlia-spama@mail.ru>
Received: from mx48.mail.ru ([94.100.176.62])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <dlia-spama@mail.ru>)
	id 1LeWc9-0005jN-Bj
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:33:01 +0000
Received: from [91.76.197.248] (portQ851 helo=PPP0193985.mtu)
	by mx48.mail.ru with asmtp 
	id 1LeWc2-0000No-00; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:54 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mikhail Vasil'jev <dlia-spama@mail.ru>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze
Message-ID: <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug@PPP0193985.mtu>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.48
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:29 +0300
X-Spam: Not detected
X-Mras: Ok
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: slime
Version: 1:20090217-1
Severity: normal

I upgraded Lenny to Squeeze today, and tried to purge slime. 

sudo aptitude purge slime
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information      
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  slime{p} 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 2269kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y
Writing extended state information... Done
(Reading database ... 123269 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing slime ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/slime.prerm: line 24: unregister-common-lisp-source: 
command not found
dpkg: error processing slime (--purge):
 subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 slime
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Reading package lists... Done             
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information      
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages slime depends on:
ii  emacsen-common                1.4.17     Common facilities for all emacsen

Versions of packages slime recommends:
pn  cl-swank                   <none>        (no description available)
ii  emacs [info-browser]       22.2+2-5      The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage)
ii  emacs22 [info-browser]     22.2+2-5      The GNU Emacs editor
ii  info [info-browser]        4.11.dfsg.1-4 Standalone GNU Info documentation 

slime suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

------------=_1236906905-29624-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 518021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 73; hammy, 151; neutral, 84; spammy,
	0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster@debian.org,
	0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz,
	0.000-+--v149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA,
	FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_1,
	IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)
	id 1LhvyH-0006z7-4O
	for 518021-close@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000
Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)
	id 1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: 518021-close@bugs.debian.org
X-DAK: dak process-unchecked
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
X-Debian: DAK
X-Debian-Package: slime
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2
Message-Id: <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em@ries.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <dak@ries.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000

Source: slime
Source-Version: 1:20090217-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slime, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
slime_20090217-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc
slime_20090217-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 518021@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> (supplier of updated slime package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100
Source: slime
Binary: slime cl-swank
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:20090217-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Description: 
 cl-swank   - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server)
 slime      - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs
Closes: 518021
Changes: 
 slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/postinst,prerm:
     - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related
       stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc
 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc
 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb
Files: 
 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc
 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz
 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb
 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL
9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb
1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/
C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU�9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------=_1236906905-29624-0--
...
From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 10:59:26 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Li56r-0005QX-Oa
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:26 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Li56q-0001pU-Qc; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:24 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1Li56q-0001pI-DA	for gclcvs@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009
   10:59:24 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1Li55B-0005aF-OM; Fri,
   13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Camm Maguire <camm@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.519534.B.123694170816101@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 519534
X-Debian-PR-Package: gclcvs
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: gclcvs
Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.123694170816101 (code B
   ref -1); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 10:55:08 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 124; neutral, 31;
   spammy, 0.	spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity,
   0.000-+--sk:buildd, 
   0.000-+--podebconf, 0.000-+--po-debconf, 0.000-+--builddepends
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
   HAS_PACKAGE,IMPRONONCABLE_1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2 autolearn=ham
   version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.173])	by
   rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from
   <luk@debian.org>) id 1Li52h-00045R-PL	for submit@bugs.debian.org;
   Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:55:07 +0000
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAL7XuUlbsO7u/2dsb2JhbACBTs4gg34G
Received: from 238.238-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO
   station.luk.local) ([91.176.238.238])  by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP;
   13 Mar 2009 11:55:00 +0100
Received: from luk by station.luk.local with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <luk@debian.org>)	id 1Li53W-0000an-QS	for
   submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100
From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20090313105558.GM1936@station.luk.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000
Delivered-To: gclcvs@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: gclcvs@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: gclcvs
X-PTS-Package: gclcvs
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Package: gclcvs Version: 2.7.0-96 Severity: serious
   There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Subject: Re:
   Log for failed build of gclcvs_2.7.0-96 on alpha Reply-To: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   0.1 FORGED_RCVD_H
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:35 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULD-0002Lo-31
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:35 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmzFi-0000DV-0E
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:50 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmzFh-0000DG-Ds	for libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:44:49 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LmzD7-0004Ae-5K; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420)
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.518877.D518877.123811082315010.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H@ries.debian.org>
   <200903081758.37343.schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518877
X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch
X-Debian-PR-Source: libsigsegv
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1238110929-16024-0"
Delivered-To: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Your message dated Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with
   message-id <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H@ries.debian.org> and subject line
   Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report
   #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be
   marked as done. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: marked as done (libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf
 version mismatch)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1238110929-16024-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000
with message-id <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #518877,
regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
518877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518877
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

------------=_1238110929-16024-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 111; neutral, 40; spammy,
	0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE,
	0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>)
	id 1LgTpH-0001vV-28
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000
Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170])
          by hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP
          id <20090309005833.SPIQ3931.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@frobnitz.localnet>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:58:33 +0000
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:58:37 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903081758.37343.schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: libsigsegv
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
touch aclocal.m4 && \
        touch configure
# autoconf's stuff for bug #466356
cp configure configure.ORG
autoconf
aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf.  If you want to use that,
you should regenerate the build system entirely.
aclocal.m4:14: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
make: *** [config.status] Error 63
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler

------------=_1238110929-16024-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 518877-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 61; hammy, 151; neutral, 108; spammy,
	0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster@debian.org,
	0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz,
	0.000-+--v149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_2,
	MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)
	id 1LmzBP-0003ta-6j
	for 518877-close@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000
Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)
	id 1Lmyow-0006eE-9H; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: 518877-close@bugs.debian.org
X-DAK: dak process-unchecked
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
X-Debian: DAK
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3
Message-Id: <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H@ries.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <dak@ries.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000

Source: libsigsegv
Source-Version: 2.5-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libsigsegv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 518877@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> (supplier of updated libsigsegv package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Description: 
 libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way
 libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way
Closes: 518877
Changes: 
 libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
     + Depends: on automake.
   * debian/rules:
     + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and
       restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green
       <plugwash@p10link.net> (Closes: #518877).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp
3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV
76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg
4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI=EKHq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------=_1238110929-16024-0--
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:34 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULB-0002Lo-Ht
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:33 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmyWE-0000Zy-7r; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:50 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmyWD-0000Za-A3; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:49 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LmyJz-0008ON-AH; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> (sbcl for {519920},
   clswank for {519920,517167})
In-Reply-To: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
References: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810735229648.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: >
   reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new
   swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found
   519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank
   server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a
 new swank server
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 -0000
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
...
reassign 519920 cl-swank
Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'.
...
found 519920 1:20090217-1
Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1.
...
severity 519920 normal
Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Severity set to `normal' from `normal'
...
merge 517167 519920
Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Merged 517167 519920.
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:37 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Gj
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmyrF-00058r-7C
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:33 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmyrE-00058Z-NJ	for libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:19:32 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1Lmyk0-0005sM-Ac; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> (libsigsegv for {518877})
In-Reply-To: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
References: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810894220094.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000
Delivered-To: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: >
   tags
   518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version
   mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping
   processing here. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf
 version mismatch
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
...
tags 518877 + pending
Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULD-0002Lo-Tw
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmzCQ-0008Fs-QJ
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000
Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from
   <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)	id
   1LmzCQ-0008Fh-7S	for libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000
Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <envelope@ftp-master.debian.org>)	id 1Lmyow-0006eC-8N;
   Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
X-Dak: dak process-unchecked
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
X-Debian: DAK
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <E1Lmyow-0006eC-8N@ries.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000
Delivered-To: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format:
   1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary:
   libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3
   Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca
   Capello
   <luca@pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page
   faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults
   in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; 
   urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules:
   + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and
   restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green
   <plugwash@p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1:
   5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
   1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
   f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976
   libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55
   15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256:
   c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478
   libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
   d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565
   libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
   9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976
   libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
   2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286
   libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0
   1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
   330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional
   libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs
   optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860
   15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted libsigsegv 2.5-3 (source amd64)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Description: 
 libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way
 libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way
Closes: 518877
Changes: 
 libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
     + Depends: on automake.
   * debian/rules:
     + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and
       restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green
       <plugwash@p10link.net> (Closes: #518877).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
 d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
 f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp
3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV
76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg
4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI=EKHq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Accepted:
libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb
libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb
libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz
libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc
...
From bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULC-0002Lo-7R
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:34 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1Ln01k-0000DX-4M; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:34:28 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1Ln01j-0000DN-KJ	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009
   00:34:27 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1Ln00M-0007nj-AC; Fri,
   27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.456004.B456004.123811387429173@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 456004
X-Debian-PR-Package: slime
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: help
X-Debian-PR-Source: slime
Received: via spool by 456004-submit@bugs.debian.org
   id�56004.123811387429173          (code B ref 456004); Fri,
   27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000
Received: (at 456004) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2009 00:31:14 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 59; hammy, 149; neutral, 81;
   spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.987-1--HTo:D*stanfordalumni.org,
   0.952-+--evaluated
   hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 
   0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
   RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham
   version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224])	by rietz.debian.org with
   esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <luca@pca.it>)	id 1Lmzyb-0007Zz-Lp	for
   456004@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:31:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45])
   by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02
   (built
   Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH5002592RUBP00@victor.unige.ch>
   for 456004@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 371AA2C0C9; Fri,
   27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
CC: 456004@bugs.debian.org
References: <20071212212706.26920.85946.reportbug@corn.betterworld.us>
   <47698D40.8050001@mailworks.org>
   <1227990689.8876.17.camel@cotton.betterworld.us>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1227990689.8876.17.camel@cotton.betterworld.us>
Message-ID: <8763hv4xix.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100,
   Ross Boylan
   wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >>
   Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log
   shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> >
   emacs-install
   emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el
   (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >> >> I've tried analysing
   this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime
   does work for me in the end. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
   0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
   lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, 456004@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000
--=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ross!

On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote:
...
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
...
Ross Boylan wrote:
...
During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows
Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ...
emacs-install emacs22
....
Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)...
Error while loading 50slime
I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes
from, but the slime does work for me in the end.
The problem is the following lines:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(load (concat "/usr/share/"
	      (if (boundp 'flavor) (symbol-name flavor)
	          "emacs")
            "/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The full output helps understanding the problem
=====
Setting up emacs22 (22.2+2-5) ...
emacs-install emacs22
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs22
emacsen-common: byte-compiling for emacs22
Loading /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el (source)...
No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default...
Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)...
Error while loading 50slime
=====

/u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is not present yet, thus
the code I reported previously fails.

=====
Wrote /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/debian-startup.elc
install/slime: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs22
Loading 00debian-vars...
No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default...
Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)...
Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el (source)...
=====

At this point, /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is
present because we have already installed slime.

Note that /u/s/emacs/site-list/slime/slime-autoloads.el is *always*
present, which means one possible solution would be to always load that
instead.  This does not change anything WRT the current situation,
because /u/s/emacs22/site-listp/slime-autoloads.el is exactly the same
the slime package install.

However, while this would solve the problem, it is not the correct
solution, since what we want is to use the compiled elisp files, thus
we should replace the above with a simpler (require 'slime-autoloads).
The latter should be evaluated *only* if byte-compiled files have been
generated, or, witch is the same, if the slime package has been
completely installed through emacsen.

Suggestions are welcome :-)

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAknMHkYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPKZwP/Q2Z0WKC/PqH1uugH5eDkIsS6
SLabH7O2CdJgrLKMfRph+67ckLVPckje4+Bs3Z8cHp/pWUBEGWvhLxdyr/Hl3Xs5
dGrciuln+/grsLnXHsQdb79WvWOgJif4je0RmCt7HYW+NMN2rZ79/RBufyuncDVx
BEoHm+0zm4MQeyDOe0s=WFdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:38 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Tf
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmymK-0003M8-3c
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:28 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmymJ-0003Lx-F4	for libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:14:27 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1Lmyjy-0005ry-FK; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.518877.B518877.123810894220104@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 518877
X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch
Received: via spool by 518877-submit@bugs.debian.org
   id�18877.123810894220104          (code B ref 518877); Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000
Received: (at 518877) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 121; neutral, 30;
   spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs,
   0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 
   0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
   IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
   autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224])	by rietz.debian.org with
   esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <luca@pca.it>)	id 1Lmyh4-0005CJ-72;
   Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45])
   by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02
   (built
   Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH40024NYYVBP00@victor.unige.ch>;
   Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 8D4552C0C9; Fri,
   27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
CC: 518877@bugs.debian.org, Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <49C4654A.1050305@p10link.net>
References: <49C4654A.1050305@p10link.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:50 +0100
Message-ID: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000
Delivered-To: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar
   2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the
   package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools
   stuff is regenerated consistantly. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
   0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
   lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, 518877@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000
--=-=-
tags 518877 + pending
thanks

Hi Peter!

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote:
...
The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than
autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly.
Thank you, applied:

http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsigsegv.git;a=commitdiff;hccc3a8...

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCwIACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMLKwQArtXAeI26G/WtnUNWz3/VKFkR
AQpV63r/uDEKtjyZ0gszKWSYlHBjv0Ajgq/Sm5JCCi9ie7H23HckRuqEAgvzkQmK
iS+l9v92FfhOPuI3XUSVXluigs8dcauiLRoVhoUnhzQ0duDEJPR9n7Ykao3AcQlt
g79eYrH58ReWJMnGZ0Q=tywT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:39 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULG-0002Lo-VA
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:39 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmyES-00059u-1Z; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:39:28 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmyER-00059k-L8	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009
   22:39:27 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LmyBB-0005NP-Am; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> (slime for {517167},
   clswank for {517167})
In-Reply-To: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
References: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810688215715.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: >
   reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new
   swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found
   517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank
   server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a
 new swank server
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
...
reassign 517167 cl-swank
Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'.
...
found 517167 1:20090217-1
Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1.
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
...
From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:40 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LnULH-0002Lo-Ck
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 +0000
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LmyFY-0005Jb-NC; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:36 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LmyFX-0005J9-RT	for slime@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009
   22:40:36 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LmyB8-0005MI-MN; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.517167.B517167.123810688215735@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517167
X-Debian-PR-Package: slime
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: slime
Received: via spool by 517167-submit@bugs.debian.org
   id�17167.123810688215735          (code B ref 517167); Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000
Received: (at 517167) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 22:34:42 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 76; hammy, 151; neutral, 248;
   spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs,
   0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 
   0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA,
   HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham
   version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224])	by rietz.debian.org with
   esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <luca@pca.it>)	id 1Lmy9p-0003vz-NL;
   Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:34:41 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45])
   by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02
   (built
   Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH400249XDMBP00@victor.unige.ch>;
   Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 7B8202C0C9; Thu,
   26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: "A.W." <gzeusmants@gmail.com>
CC: 517167@bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel <slime-devel@common-lisp.net>
References: <613b861a0902252149s61a17530p932d3621ad97dc29@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:29 +0100
Message-ID: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000
Delivered-To: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: slime@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: slime
X-PTS-Package: slime
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1
   thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think
   there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
   0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
   lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50        message body is 25-50% uppercase
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, 517167@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:41 -0000
--=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

reassign 517167 cl-swank
found 517167 1:20090217-1
thanks

Hi there!

Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a
misinterpretation about the function you use.

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote:
...
Package: slime
The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-swank one,
reassigned.
...
Version: 1:20090217
This is not a proper Debian version, which is always in the form

  $UPSTREAM_VERSION-$DEBIAN_REVISION

For the next time, can you please submit bugs using the reportbug tool,
as explained in the following link?

  http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

This also helps the environment in which you have experienced the bug,
e.g. versions of other dependendent packages and so on.
...
Starting a new swank server with the following code
(require 'asdf)
This is not needed since ASDF is loaded by default on Debian Common Lisp
implementations.
...
(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank)
This works as expected.
...
;Specifically, this line\/
What does this mean?
...
(swank:start-server :dont-close t)
results in the following error:
debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread #<THREAD
"initial thread" RUNNING {AA6A649}>:
  odd number of &KEY arguments
Are you sure that `start-server' is intended to be used from a CL
implementation?  The source code seems to disagree with this use:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun start-server (port-file &key (style *communication-style*)
                                    (dont-close *dont-close*)
                                    (coding-system *coding-system*))
  "Start the server and write the listen port number to PORT-FILE.
This is the entry point for Emacs."
  (setup-server 0 (lambda (port) 
                    (announce-server-port port-file port))
                style dont-close 
                (find-external-format-or-lose coding-system)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Leaving the rest of your mail for the slime-devel@ mailing list.
...
Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.
restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
  0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.
(SWANK:START-SERVER :DONT-CLOSE)[:EXTERNAL]
A longer backtrace when trying to load the same code from stumpwm via
stumpwm-mode, though I think all relevant information is the same:
odd number of &KEY arguments0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE
(LAMBDA #) {B95CCAD}>)[:EXTERNAL]
1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {B95CC59}>)
2: (BACKTRACE-STRING)
3: (ERR "~A")[:EXTERNAL]
4: (EVAL-LINE "(swank:start-server :dont-close t)")
5: (CALL-INTERACTIVELY
 "eval"
 #S(ARGUMENT-LINE
 :STRING "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)"
 :START 39))
6: (EVAL-COMMAND "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" NIL)
7: (HANDLE-STUMPWM-COMMANDS #<XLIB:WINDOW :0 67>)
8: (HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL]
9: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK))
10: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]509))
11: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK
 #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {B77FDCB5}>
 #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX
 :NAME "CLX Event Lock"
 :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING {B696571}>
 :STATE 1))
12: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation
R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL]
13: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP)
14: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0")
15: (STUMPWM ":0")
16: ((LAMBDA ()))
17: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP))
I don't have any suggestions at the moment, though perhaps the
upstream slime will have a fix soon. It's possible that this is an
sbcl bug, but what research I'm able to do points me to slime/swank.
I am using Debian GNU/Linux Sid, updated.
--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAknMAvYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMqIwP9FqyzS7nCxNE4drYp9Dq/tJZ4
pY2Sf+k46uVdSz8tBqwaB4WWYsQ7H3SNvWMxToBS9B3QVua1sOvfRr3tQ20ym4sP
p9xfVEx2n80I33g7KvZmMFap9IxhZeE1mmm4C64XIDcwOgOYB6ryjqYirY7mUa/8
GnaXUmcaiZShs/T0bxs=NMSM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
...
From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 16:45:49 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoOMe-0003vg-6A
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:45:49 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoNyh-0002JV-5G
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:21:03 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LoNyg-0002Iu-FY	for clisp@packages.qa.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009
   20:21:02 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LoNvn-0006y9-O8; Mon,
   30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team
   <pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.521906.B.123844401222508@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521906
X-Debian-PR-Package: clisp
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: clisp
Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.123844401222508 (code B
   ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 68; hammy, 141; neutral, 36;
   spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE,
   0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
   autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123])	by
   rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from
   <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>)	id 1LoNrP-0005oj-TF	for
   submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000
Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170])          by
   hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP          id
   <20090330201318.HIGC23691.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@frobnitz.localnet>
   for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:26 +0000
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:13:39 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <200903301313.40166.schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000
Delivered-To: clisp@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: clisp@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: clisp
X-PTS-Package: clisp
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious
   From my pbuilder build log: ...
   /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run
   -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B
   /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build
   -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8
   -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ; ;
   MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ; ; 
   MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ; ;
   MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ; ;
   packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199,
   932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment
   -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations
   -Wno-sign-compare
   -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC -I.. -c bdb.m.c
   -o
   bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703:
   error:
   'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703:
   error:
   (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for
   each
   function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE'
   undeclared
   (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list':
   bdb.c:939:
   error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   bdb.c:943:
   error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:
   In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error:
   'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE'
   undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:1110: error:
   'DB_DIRECT_LOG'
   undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1
   make[2]:
   Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db'
   make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory
   `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build'
   make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure:
   debian/rules
   build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521906: clisp: FTBFS: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>, 521906@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:45:49 -0000
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B 
/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 
-Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c
;; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c"
;; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines
;; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init)
;; packages: ("BDB")
MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199,932 bytes)
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc   -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -
Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC 
-I.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o
bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options':
bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function)
bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.)
bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list':
bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function)
bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options':
bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db'
make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:14:01 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoOnw-0004ls-TB
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:14:01 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: luca@pca.it
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
   <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87vdpqivhn.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87vdpqivhn.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription >
   unsubscribe
   cl-lw-compat cl-debian@common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been
   sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net
   subscription
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:14:01 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription
...
unsubscribe cl-lw-compat cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-syslog cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-typesetting cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-ubf cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-uffi cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-unit cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-units cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-utilities cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-who cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cl-xmls cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
...
From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:35:14 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoP8U-0005cn-7h
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:35:14 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
   <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoP8T-0005Kw-Fa
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:13 +0000
Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43])	by master.debian.org
   with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id
   1LoP8S-0005KH-R0	for gcl@packages.qa.debian.org;
   Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:12 +0000
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)	id 1LoP6P-0003R9-4F; Mon,
   30 Mar 2009 21:33:15 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.521929.B.12384484769463@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521929
X-Debian-PR-Package: gcl
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: gcl
Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.12384484769463 (code B
   ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 21:27:56 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
   (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 34; hammy, 127; neutral, 33;
   spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE,
   0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
   autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123])	by
   rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from
   <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>)	id 1LoP0x-0002LG-DI	for
   submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:32 +0000
Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170])          by
   hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with ESMTP          id
   <20090330212718.VCIW27506.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com@frobnitz.localnet>
   for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:21 +0000
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:27:36 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <200903301427.36990.schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:05 +0000
Delivered-To: gcl@packages.qa.debian.org
Precedence: list
X-Loop: gcl@packages.qa.debian.org
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: gcl
X-PTS-Package: gcl
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious From
   my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl,
   -Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl
   -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline
   -lncurses
   -lc -lgclp ./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function
   `bfd_uncompress_section_contents':
   /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96:
   undefined reference to `inflateInit_'
   /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103:
   undefined reference to `inflate'
   /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106:
   undefined reference to `inflateReset'
   /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108:
   undefined reference to `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
   make[2]:
   *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory
   `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport'
   make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving
   directory
   `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2
   dpkg-buildpackage:
   failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-3.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521929: gcl: FTBFS: current binutils static libs
   need -lz
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>, 521929@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:14 -0000
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-45
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
gcc -o raw_pre_gcl  \
                -L.  -Wl,-Map raw_pre_gcl_map   -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE  -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11    -lm  -pg -
lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp 
./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_section_contents':
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: undefined reference to 
`inflateInit_'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: undefined reference to 
`inflate'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: undefined reference to 
`inflateReset'
/tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: undefined reference to 
`inflateEnd'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport'
make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7'
make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:37:07 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPAI-0005df-Ts
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:37:07 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPAI-0005iK-5V; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.303.1238447496.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87myb2hevd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87myb2hevd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPAI-0005iK-5V@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-lw-compat
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:07 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:36 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:00:27 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPWs-0006uT-T1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:27 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.302.1238447494.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87skkufz81.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87skkufz81.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-uffi@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-uffi
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:27 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-uffi@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:00 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPXP-00071k-R3; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:00 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPXP-0003eK-7r; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.301.1238447494.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87ocvifz72.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87ocvifz72.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPXP-0003eK-7r@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-syslog@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-syslog
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:00 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-syslog@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:28 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPXs-00072D-D4; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:28 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPXr-0003o1-GV; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.305.1238447499.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87iqlqfz6a.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87iqlqfz6a.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPXr-0003o1-GV@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-ubf@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-ubf
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:28 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-ubf@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:55 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPYI-00072f-RJ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:55 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.304.1238447499.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87eiwefz5m.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87eiwefz5m.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from cl-typesetting@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-typesetting
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:55 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-typesetting@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:02:42 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZ4-00073T-6H; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:02:42 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZ3-00046K-GU; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.306.1238447574.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <878wmmfz48.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <878wmmfz48.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPZ3-00046K-GU@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-who@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-who
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:42 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-who@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:12:54 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:07 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZS-00073r-Ou; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:07 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.307.1238447641.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <874oxafz3l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <874oxafz3l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 071afd2345e5a788643408a4073bc122 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-xmls@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-xmls
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:07 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 071afd2345e5a788643408a4073bc122
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-xmls@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:01 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:31 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZr-00074H-1v; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:31 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPZq-0004Oa-DX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.308.1238447645.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87zlf2ekif.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87zlf2ekif.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPZq-0004Oa-DX@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:30 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 68893b5728b3b8e6ba17b87d086ad69d cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-unit@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-unit
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:31 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 68893b5728b3b8e6ba17b87d086ad69d
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-unit@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:05 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:57 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPaH-00074o-22; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:57 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPaG-0004Ty-D8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.311.1238447689.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87vdpqekhp.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87vdpqekhp.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPaG-0004Ty-D8@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:56 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM ee1e940a0f5cc5dbe470e93944e0bf2c cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cl-units@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-units
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:57 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM ee1e940a0f5cc5dbe470e93944e0bf2c
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-units@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:49 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:04:19 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPac-00075K-9c; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:04:18 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPab-0004YI-N4; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.312.1238447689.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87r60eekh4.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87r60eekh4.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPab-0004YI-N4@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:17 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 4e9e1a6e97ff157a9fe9181f24f9c198 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from cl-utilities@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-utilities
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:19 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 4e9e1a6e97ff157a9fe9181f24f9c198
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-utilities@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:49 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:08:19 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPeU-00078D-M4
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:08:19 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoPeT-0005n2-VE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: luca@pca.it
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
   <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87hc1aekai.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87hc1aekai.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoPeT-0005n2-VE@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:17 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription >
   unsubscribe
   clisp cl-debian@common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to
   cl-debian@common-lisp.net. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net
   subscription
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:20 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription
...
unsubscribe clisp cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cltl cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe cmucl cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe common-lisp-controller cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe dh-lisp cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe ecl cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe fiveam cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe gcl cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe gclcvs cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe hyperspec cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe ironclad cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:36:54 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ6A-00080j-60; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:36:54 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ69-0006A3-Ce; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.331.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87k566bptw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87k566bptw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQ69-0006A3-Ce@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 779e840b8acfa9d1db5a66033d92b947 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cltl@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cltl
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:54 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 779e840b8acfa9d1db5a66033d92b947
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cltl@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:37:30 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ6j-00081B-WA; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:37:30 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ6j-0006IB-Ac; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.324.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87fxgubpsw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87fxgubpsw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQ6j-0006IB-Ac@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:29 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 85e6092a39b4ee9869d07d3e008767f5 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from cmucl@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cmucl
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:30 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 85e6092a39b4ee9869d07d3e008767f5
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cmucl@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:40:21 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ9U-0008Om-CT; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:40:20 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ9T-000776-Or; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.323.1238450900.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87bpribpo6.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87bpribpo6.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQ9T-000776-Or@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:19 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 78f73be3d2896de2d004a987ba23f70c cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from gcl@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gcl
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:21 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 78f73be3d2896de2d004a987ba23f70c
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gcl@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:40:45 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ9t-0000B7-0U; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:40:45 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQ9s-0007Ba-8h; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.332.1238450902.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <877i26bpnh.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <877i26bpnh.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQ9s-0007Ba-8h@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:44 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM d5c83c45f74f9da430e43e205e5aa2e2 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from fiveam@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to fiveam
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:45 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM d5c83c45f74f9da430e43e205e5aa2e2
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from fiveam@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:22 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:07 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQAF-0000BZ-CE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:07 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQAE-0007Gi-SZ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.325.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <873acubpmv.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <873acubpmv.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQAE-0007Gi-SZ@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:06 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 9ca047957c10e3ce460da425101124ea cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from dh-lisp@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to dh-lisp
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:07 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 9ca047957c10e3ce460da425101124ea
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from dh-lisp@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:30 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQAb-0000C3-L1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:29 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQAb-0007Mp-4E; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.327.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87y6umab1s.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87y6umab1s.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQAb-0007Mp-4E@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:29 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM b7d1a3b77e54772c4c9719a02319bce9 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from ecl@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ecl
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:30 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM b7d1a3b77e54772c4c9719a02319bce9
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ecl@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:54 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQB0-0000CZ-2o; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:54 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQAz-0007SY-BR; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.333.1238450903.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87tz5aab14.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87tz5aab14.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQAz-0007SY-BR@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:53 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 91c52cbe296893fd779dac77b6fc31e4 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from common-lisp-controller@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to common-lisp-controller
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:54 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 91c52cbe296893fd779dac77b6fc31e4
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from common-lisp-controller@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:23 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:42:17 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQBM-0000Cw-R6; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:17 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQBM-0007aj-8K; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.330.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87prfyab0h.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87prfyab0h.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQBM-0007aj-8K@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM fc9a9617f67cb2c3713af078541e9643 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from gclcvs@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gclcvs
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:17 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM fc9a9617f67cb2c3713af078541e9643
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gclcvs@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:42:38 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQBi-0000DO-8t; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:38 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQBh-0007g8-N1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.329.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87ljqmaazw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87ljqmaazw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQBh-0007g8-N1@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 64e71e78a8731d6034fd83d6912deb3b cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from ironclad@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ironclad
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:38 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 64e71e78a8731d6034fd83d6912deb3b
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ironclad@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:43:00 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQC3-0000Do-GZ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:59 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQC2-0007mp-P8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.328.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87hc1aaazb.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87hc1aaazb.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQC2-0007mp-P8@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:58 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 84df9fe237364395d77fad155dda7df8 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from hyperspec@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to hyperspec
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:00 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 84df9fe237364395d77fad155dda7df8
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from hyperspec@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:43:19 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQCM-0000E8-QB; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:19 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQCM-0007zI-Ax; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.326.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87d4byaayr.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87d4byaayr.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQCM-0007zI-Ax@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:18 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 83afe6115d98307892e3e3fc82cf01aa cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from clisp@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to clisp
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:19 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 83afe6115d98307892e3e3fc82cf01aa
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from clisp@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:46:54 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQFn-0000Gb-Ng
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:46:54 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQFn-0000I8-0D; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: luca@pca.it
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
   <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87vdpq8w8h.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87vdpq8w8h.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQFn-0000I8-0D@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:51 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription >
   unsubscribe
   libsigsegv cl-debian@common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent
   to cl-debian@common-lisp.net. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net
   subscription
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:56 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription
...
unsubscribe libsigsegv cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe memoization cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe onlisp cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe parenscript cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe qbook cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe quick-arrays cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe rfc2388 cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe s-xml cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe series cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe slime cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe stumpwm cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe tbnl cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe trivial-sockets cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe url-rewrite cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
unsubscribe xml-to-sexp cl-debian@common-lisp.net
A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian@common-lisp.net.
...
thanks
Stopping processing here.
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:31:36 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQx5-0001uD-Hi; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:31:35 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQx4-0002Dt-Fy; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.339.1238453214.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87k5666110.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87k5666110.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQx4-0002Dt-Fy@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:34 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM a0d8afc9c8160f5e320316aebf9359f5 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from trivial-sockets@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to trivial-sockets
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:36 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM a0d8afc9c8160f5e320316aebf9359f5
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from trivial-sockets@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:54 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:32:17 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQxk-0001v1-Oq; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:32:17 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQxk-0002LP-5Q; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.342.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87fxgu60zx.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87fxgu60zx.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQxk-0002LP-5Q@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:16 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 6dad84e37164ccf1322f300ec6cf9281 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to libsigsegv
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:17 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 6dad84e37164ccf1322f300ec6cf9281
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from libsigsegv@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:32:37 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQy5-0001vs-CN; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:32:37 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQy4-0002PU-Ef; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.340.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87bpri60z9.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87bpri60z9.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQy4-0002PU-Ef@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:36 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 8149aa0cf00464c630f2ac08a31ec457 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from memoization@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to memoization
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:38 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8149aa0cf00464c630f2ac08a31ec457
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from memoization@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:03 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQyV-0001wU-6C; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:03 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQyU-0002Vx-B3; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.341.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <877i2660yj.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <877i2660yj.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQyU-0002Vx-B3@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:02 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 3cbefbc4629628054d57d66b85b25d72 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from quick-arrays@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to quick-arrays
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:04 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 3cbefbc4629628054d57d66b85b25d72
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from quick-arrays@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:24 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQyp-0001x5-Mk; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:23 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQyo-0002ha-S8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.343.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <873acu60xz.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <873acu60xz.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQyo-0002ha-S8@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:22 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 088a7b0fec277e1fd86aa25984fd97bc cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from url-rewrite@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to url-rewrite
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:24 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 088a7b0fec277e1fd86aa25984fd97bc
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from url-rewrite@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:44 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQz9-0001xT-LX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:43 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQz8-0002mb-VF; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.345.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87y6um4mcy.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87y6um4mcy.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQz8-0002mb-VF@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:42 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM afb5037e80ad82ea49b965967358aa23 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from xml-to-sexp@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to xml-to-sexp
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:44 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM afb5037e80ad82ea49b965967358aa23
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from xml-to-sexp@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:34:05 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQzU-0001xo-UE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:34:05 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQzU-0002rb-95; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.352.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87tz5a4mcd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87tz5a4mcd.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQzU-0002rb-95@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:04 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 1cef9d2631aa3aa021832cdf3ec1c7c4 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from s-xml@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to s-xml
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:05 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 1cef9d2631aa3aa021832cdf3ec1c7c4
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from s-xml@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:34:24 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQzn-0001yJ-VI; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:34:24 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoQzn-0002va-Bc; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.347.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87prfy4mbu.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87prfy4mbu.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoQzn-0002va-Bc@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:23 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 53d0cac64412cc900dac1c5d0efa5373 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from slime@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to slime
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:24 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 53d0cac64412cc900dac1c5d0efa5373
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from slime@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:35:33 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR0v-00021N-ED; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:35:33 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR0r-0003Cm-Ro; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.344.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87d4by4ma1.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87d4by4ma1.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoR0r-0003Cm-Ro@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:29 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 67defe54e5548c86293ccffa4868ba97 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been
   unsubscribed from parenscript@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to parenscript
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:33 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 67defe54e5548c86293ccffa4868ba97
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from parenscript@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:35:55 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR1G-00021g-GB; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:35:54 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR1D-0003Go-R2; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.348.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <878wmm4m9i.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <878wmm4m9i.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoR1D-0003Go-R2@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:51 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 589ad073ba96a3e3586f2841f7dcab8b cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from tbnl@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to tbnl
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:55 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 589ad073ba96a3e3586f2841f7dcab8b
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from tbnl@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:36:40 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR1z-00022Z-MC; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:40 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR1y-0003VI-Tu; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.353.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87y6um37nn.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87y6um37nn.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoR1y-0003VI-Tu@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:38 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 0e16ced572a1200ac4f6d56a803c645c cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from series@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to series
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:40 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 0e16ced572a1200ac4f6d56a803c645c
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from series@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:37:08 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR2Q-00022x-FX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:37:08 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoR2P-0003am-6q; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.349.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87tz5a37mx.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87tz5a37mx.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoR2P-0003am-6q@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM b88b49ede2391b500c56974b5ffd9f5d cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from onlisp@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to onlisp
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:09 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM b88b49ede2391b500c56974b5ffd9f5d
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from onlisp@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:52:32 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRHL-0002jx-R1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:52:32 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRHL-0008Ah-38; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.351.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87wsa61scq.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87wsa61scq.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoRHL-0008Ah-38@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:31 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM cf8da2a18066aca6a7511392fa1ac604 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from stumpwm@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to stumpwm
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:32 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM cf8da2a18066aca6a7511392fa1ac604
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from stumpwm@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:53:04 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRHr-0002kO-Nr; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:04 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRHr-0008Kp-60; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.350.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87skku1sbw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87skku1sbw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoRHr-0008Kp-60@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:03 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM d1004b64e66f6823a01e5aaa930d7a97 cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from rfc2388@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to rfc2388
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:04 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM d1004b64e66f6823a01e5aaa930d7a97
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from rfc2388@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From bounces@packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:53:28 2009
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRIG-0002ko-Ho; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:28 -0400
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <bounces@packages.qa.debian.org>)
   id 1LoRIE-00006f-Pj; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
From: owner@packages.qa.debian.org
To: cl-debian-owner@common-lisp.net
X-Loop: pts@qa.debian.org
References: <mailman.346.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
   <87ocvi1sb7.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
In-Reply-To: <87ocvi1sb7.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
CC: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Message-Id: <E1LoRIE-00006f-Pj@master.debian.org>
Sender: Debian QA <qa@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:26 +0000
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org: > Subject:
   Re:
   CONFIRM 5f4a0ae6e1be87c0f7759b3c98f49ebd cl-debian@common-lisp.net has
   been unsubscribed from qbook@packages.qa.debian.org. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to qbook
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:29 -0000
Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
...
Subject: Re: CONFIRM 5f4a0ae6e1be87c0f7759b3c98f49ebd
cl-debian@common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from qbook@packages.qa.debian.org.
...
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200,
...
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:    cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Five lines without new commands: stopping.
1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye !
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri May 15 22:05:14 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1M59Gz-0000h2-UR
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:14 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cl-cairo2-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1M59Gq-0000gi-RT; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:05 -0400
Received: from postoffice03.princeton.edu ([128.112.131.174]
   helo=Princeton.EDU) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <tpapp@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>)
   id 1M59Gp-0000gY-8g; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:03 -0400
Received: from smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU
   [128.112.129.148])
   by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4G1pTwH001978;
   Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pu100877.student.princeton.edu (pu100877.student.Princeton.EDU
   [140.180.166.160]) (authenticated bits=0)
   by smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
   n4G1pTSG016069
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher�S-CBC3-SHA bits8 verify=NOT);
   Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tpapp by pu100877.student.princeton.edu with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <tpapp@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>)
   id 1M593f-0001VO-Ee; Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:27 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:27 -0400
From: Tamas K Papp <tpapp@Princeton.EDU>
To: cl-cairo2-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net,
   Kei Suzuki <ksdevx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090516015127.GA5341@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everyone,
   I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT
   repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is
   kept
   now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context*
   global variable, and moved context to the first argument,
   so now you write [...]
   Content analysis details:   (-3.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
   [score: 0.2190]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everyone,
   I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT
   repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is
   kept
   now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context*
   global variable, and moved context to the first argument,
   so now you write [...]
   Content analysis details:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everyone,
   I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT
   repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is
   kept
   now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context*
   global variable, and moved context to the first argument,
   so now you write [...]
   Content analysis details:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-cairo2-announce] syntax change in cl-cairo2
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:05:14 -0000
Hi everyone,

I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository
http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now.

The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global
variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write

(move-to context 0 -2)

instead of

(move-to 0 -2 context)

or

(setf *context*)
(move-to 0 -2)

I know this is an important change in syntax, and may break a lot of
code.  I apologize for the inconvenience, but this has been a major
wart on the initial design and I have always wanted to fix it.

Best,

Tamas

_______________________________________________
cl-cairo2-announce mailing list
cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-cairo2-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun May 24 12:11:13 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1M8GI4-0005JX-9Z
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:12 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cl-cairo2-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1M8GHv-0005J9-6y; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:03 -0400
Received: from postoffice03.princeton.edu ([128.112.131.174]
   helo=Princeton.EDU) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <tpapp@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>)
   id 1M8GHr-0005Ir-Ak; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:00 -0400
Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU
   [128.112.129.65])
   by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4OGAwt0015986;
   Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pu100877.student.princeton.edu (pu100877.student.Princeton.EDU
   [140.180.166.160]) (authenticated bits=0)
   by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
   n4OGAvZQ015307
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher�S-CBC3-SHA bits8 verify=NOT);
   Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tpapp by pu100877.student.princeton.edu with local (Exim 4.69)
   (envelope-from <tpapp@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>)
   id 1M8GHp-00010n-BN; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:57 -0400
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:57 -0400
From: Tamas K Papp <tpapp@Princeton.EDU>
To: cl-cairo2-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net,
   Kei Suzuki <ksdevx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090524161057.GA3825@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>
References: <20090516015127.GA5341@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090516015127.GA5341@pu100877.student.princeton.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi cl-cairo2 users,
   Comments after this change have persuaded
   me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but
   with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2,
   please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi cl-cairo2 users,
   Comments after this change have persuaded
   me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but
   with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2,
   please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi cl-cairo2 users,
   Comments after this change have persuaded
   me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but
   with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2,
   please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-4.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-cairo2-announce] syntax change in
   cl-cairo2
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:11:13 -0000
Hi cl-cairo2 users,

Comments after this change have persuaded me to change the interface
to something similar to the old one (but with a keyword argument).  If
you are still using cl-cairo2, please let me know what you think by
commenting here:

http://tkpapp.blogspot.com/2009/05/cl-cairo2-interface-poll.html

Thanks,

Tamas

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:51:27PM -0400, Tamas K Papp wrote:
...
Hi everyone,
I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository
http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now.
The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global
variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write
(move-to context 0 -2)
instead of
(move-to 0 -2 context)
or
(setf *context*)
(move-to 0 -2)
I know this is an important change in syntax, and may break a lot of
code.  I apologize for the inconvenience, but this has been a major
wart on the initial design and I have always wanted to fix it.
Best,
Tamas
_______________________________________________
cl-cairo2-announce mailing list
cl-cairo2-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-cairo2-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Mon Sep 21 06:11:12 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1MpfrU-0000OY-1n
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:12 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1MpfrL-0000O8-CL; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:03 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <vsedach@gmail.com>) id 1MpfrH-0000Nx-Np
   for parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net;
   Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:00 -0400
Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2269400ewy.10
   for <parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.3.14 with SMTP id 14mr2654980ebc.61.1253523601832; Mon, 21 
   Sep 2009 02:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:00:01 -0600
Message-ID: <c07e645b0909210200g5dbcb18at4398a2003d1ce6ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com>
To: parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net, 
   parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   A new version of Parenscript has been released. This
   release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND
   Common
   Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell),
   much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes,
   real and efficient lexical scoping
   for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to
   direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been
   removed
   is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be
   special
   cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has
   been
   done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers
   designed
   for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on
   the
   dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot
   access. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   A new version of Parenscript has been released. This
   release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND
   Common
   Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell),
   much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes,
   real and efficient lexical scoping
   for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to
   direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been
   removed
   is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be
   special
   cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has
   been
   done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers
   designed
   for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on
   the
   dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot
   access. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   A new version of Parenscript has been released. This
   release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND
   Common
   Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell),
   much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes,
   real and efficient lexical scoping
   for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to
   direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been
   removed
   is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be
   special
   cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has
   been
   done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers
   designed
   for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on
   the
   dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot
   access. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript release.
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:11:12 -0000
Hello,

A new version of Parenscript has been released. This release comes
with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND Common Lisp
facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell),
much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes, real and efficient
lexical scoping for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well
as the ability to direct compiler output directly to a stream. One
thing that has been removed is support for the dot symbol notation (ie
- 'object.property' would be special cased into (slot-value object
'property) by the compiler) - this has been done to allow Parenscript
code to be a useful target for code walkers designed for regular Lisp
code. The consequence is that any code that relies on the dot notation
will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot access.

Thank you,
Vladimir

_______________________________________________
parenscript-announce mailing list
parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed Oct 28 04:06:49 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1N33YP-0007At-4H
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:49 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cl-ppcre-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1N33Y0-0007Af-Ri; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:25 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1N33Xy-00079Y-E1
   for cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:22 -0400
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so755804bwz.2
   for <cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.48.210 with SMTP id s18mr8112477bkf.162.1256715739118; 
   Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:42:18 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: deb3d2156301164d
Message-ID: <b56421a00910280042g491ea68bu78ae95f7294bf891@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list about cl-ppcre and cl-unicode
   <cl-ppcre-devel@common-lisp.net>, cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download
   from
   the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to
   LispWorks users. Edi. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download
   from
   the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to
   LispWorks users. Edi. cl-ppcre-announce mailing list
   cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce [...]
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download
   from
   the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to
   LispWorks users. Edi. cl-ppcre-announce mailing list
   cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce [...]
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-ppcre-announce] New release 2.0.3
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:06:49 -0000
There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download from the usual
place.  The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to LispWorks
users.

Edi.

_______________________________________________
cl-ppcre-announce mailing list
cl-ppcre-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
...
...
...
I have to admit that I rarely, if ever,
   used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun
   and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I
   was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state,
   but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it,
   I >> didn't keep track with .NET development
   and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make
   RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches,
but I won't be able to test or evaluate
...
...
...
...
Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi,
I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface
   with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback
   mechanism
...
...
...
...
I have to admit that I rarely, if ever,
   used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun
   and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I
   was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state,
   but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it,
   I >> didn't keep track with .NET development
   and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make
   RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches,
but I won't be able to test or evaluate
...
...
...
...
Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi,
I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface
   with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback
   mechanism
...
...
...
...
I have to admit that I rarely, if ever,
   used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun
   and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I
   was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state,
   but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it,
   I >> didn't keep track with .NET development
   and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make
   RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches,
but I won't be able to test or evaluate
...
...
...
...
Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi,
I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface
   with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback
   mechanism
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Thu Nov 12 17:01:17 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1N8hjA-0005oU-DK
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:16 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1N8hj1-0005o2-4K
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:07 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1N8hiy-0005nI-Du
   for rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:04 -0500
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so2875826fxm.2
   for <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:00:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.10.135 with SMTP id p7mr892579bkp.69.1258059430924; Thu, 
   12 Nov 2009 12:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:57:10 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 148f2ccab30b6fbc
Message-ID: <b56421a00911121257v1a76b3c3j396ae7a8d349be07@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks Raymond,
   I've just made a new release. I made a few
   cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue,
   Nov
   10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > I've had
   a little startup trouble with RDNZL,
   but this is mainly due to my > lack of
   familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName
   will
   most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more
   helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended,
   at some later point,
   to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes
   the trivial change to load-assembly,
   as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container.
   do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what
   do-rdnzl-arrays
   does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On
   Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond,
   them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release
   if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >>
   http://weitz.de/patches.html
   that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C#
   interface)
   with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL
   can
   be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial
   to do),
   so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for
   interfacing
   with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this,
   probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks Raymond,
   I've just made a new release. I made a few
   cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue,
   Nov
   10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > I've had
   a little startup trouble with RDNZL,
   but this is mainly due to my > lack of
   familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName
   will
   most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more
   helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended,
   at some later point,
   to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes
   the trivial change to load-assembly,
   as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container.
   do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what
   do-rdnzl-arrays
   does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On
   Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond,
   them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release
   if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >>
   http://weitz.de/patches.html
   that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C#
   interface)
   with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL
   can
   be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial
   to do),
   so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for
   interfacing
   with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this,
   probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net,
   General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks Raymond,
   I've just made a new release. I made a few
   cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue,
   Nov
   10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > I've had
   a little startup trouble with RDNZL,
   but this is mainly due to my > lack of
   familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName
   will
   most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more
   helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended,
   at some later point,
   to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes
   the trivial change to load-assembly,
   as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container.
   do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what
   do-rdnzl-arrays
   does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On
   Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond,
   them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release
   if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >>
   http://weitz.de/patches.html
   that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C#
   interface)
   with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL
   can
   be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial
   to do),
   so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for
   interfacing
   with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this,
   probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.0
   (Was:	[rdnzl-devel]	LoadWithPartialName vs Load)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:01:17 -0000
Thanks Raymond, I've just made a new release.  I made a few cosmetic
changes, so please check if I didn't break anything.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
I've had a little startup trouble with RDNZL, but �this is mainly due to my
lack of familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of
LoadWithPartialName will most likely not be noticed by most people, but will
provide (IMO) more helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be
extended, at some later point, to use fully-qualified assembly names.
The enclosed patch includes the trivial change to load-assembly, as well as
a new macro called do-rdnzl-container. do-rdnzl-container does for general
enumerable collections what do-rdnzl-arrays does for arrays.
Thank you for making rdnzl available!
On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote:
...
Hi Raymond,
I have to admit that I rarely, if ever, used RDNZL myself. �I started
writing it for fun and only finished it because I gave a talk about
it. �At that time I was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable
state, but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it, I
didn't keep track with .NET development and I'm sure it's out of tune
now.
If you have changes to make RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches,
but I won't be able to test or evaluate them due to lack of time.
I'll simply pack them into a new release if they follow the usual
patch guidelines:
�http://weitz.de/patches.html
Thanks,
Edi.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Hi,
I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface with certain .NET libraries.
These libraries have a callback mechanism that requires me to subclass
a C# class (or implement a C# interface) with two specific methods. I
haven't seen any mention that RDNZL can be used to subclass C# classes
(which I guess would be non-trivial to do), so I'm guessing that I
need to write a C# wrapper class for interfacing with Lisp.
I'm having certain problems with this, probably caused by some .NET
details that I haven't (yet) understood. As part of unravelling this,
I've discovered that import-assembly calls load-assembly and that a
failure in load-assembly will cause a null assembly to be returned,
from which import-assembly will import exactly zero items. In other
words, any errors from load-assembly will not be signalled until
later.
The MS documentation states that LoadWithPartialName (as used by
load-assembly) is an obsolete call, and that that
System.Reflection.Assembly.Load() should be used instead. Load() can
even be used with partial names, like this:
(defun load-assembly-2 (name)
�(let ((fullname (new "System.Reflection.AssemblyName")))
� (setf [%Name fullname] name)
� [System.Reflection.Assembly.Load fullname]))
I've just tried this, and load-assembly-2 gives an exception which is
transferred perfectly through RDNZL in cases where load-assembly
returns null.
Regards,
Raymond Wiker
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-devel mailing list
rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-devel mailing list
rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-announce mailing list
rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
not seeing the debug statements, removed them,
   and here's the remade patch. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
not seeing the debug statements, removed them,
   and here's the remade patch. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
not seeing the debug statements, removed them,
   and here's the remade patch. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Mon Nov 23 15:30:22 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NCfYE-0005qt-0Z
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:22 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cl-gd-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NCfXw-0005pd-0d; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:04 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f214.google.com ([209.85.218.214])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1NCfXu-0005dB-1x; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:02 -0500
Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so5590693bwz.11
   for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:29:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.35.12 with SMTP id n12mr5165329bkd.147.1259006715823; Mon, 
   23 Nov 2009 12:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:05:15 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: beb2c78b86d5232d
Message-ID: <b56421a00911231205u4c23011eo4accb9115b446d08@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham@comcast.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham
   <j.k.cunningham@comcast.net>: >
   In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request,
   I slapped my forehead for
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cl-gd-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham
   <j.k.cunningham@comcast.net>: >
   In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request,
   I slapped my forehead for
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: cl-gd-announce@common-lisp.net,
   General interest list about cl-gd <cl-gd-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham
   <j.k.cunningham@comcast.net>: >
   In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request,
   I slapped my forehead for
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-gd-announce] New release 0.5.7 (Was: cl-gd
   patch)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:30:23 -0000
2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham@comcast.net>:
...
In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request, I slapped my forehead for
not seeing the debug statements, removed them, and here's the remade patch.
I've now uploaded release 0.5.7 which contains your patch.

Thanks,
Edi.

_______________________________________________
cl-gd-announce mailing list
cl-gd-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-gd-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Dec 01 18:13:01 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NFbu0-0000h9-Kk
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:13:01 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NFbtv-0000gw-OV; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:12:56 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1NFbtt-0000gp-Bg
   for drakma-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:12:53 -0500
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so4088938bwz.2
   for <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:12:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.13.215 with SMTP id d23mr6744197bka.18.1259707419498; Tue, 
   01 Dec 2009 14:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:43:39 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 359cab6a3ed9b7e5
Message-ID: <b56421a00912011443m43dc4e8fgca209457557b384@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update
   one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update
   one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update
   one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New releases (1.1.0) of Drakma
   and Chunga...
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:01 -0000
...can be found at the usual location.

If you update one of the libraries, please update both.

What's new?

  http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt
  http://weitz.de/chunga/CHANGELOG.txt

Thanks,
Edi.

_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 16:23:08 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGfcJ-00022e-E9
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:23:07 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGfcA-00022M-TP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:59 -0500
Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1NGfc7-00022F-1P
   for closer-announce@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:56 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGoDGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWf4QzBA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 22:19:09 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74A590060
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:19:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id LutP-HbU-9qX for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:19:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF3F59005D
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:19:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:19:06 +0100
Message-Id: <464635B2-1004-4C91-A0C7-4133C4DE8B36@p-cos.net>
To: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are
   the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic
   environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand,
   these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL,
   by way of using a separate system definition. (In
   that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used,
   so this should run in any ANSI-compliant
   Common Lisp implementation.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are
   the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic
   environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand,
   these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL,
   by way of using a separate system definition. (In
   that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used,
   so this should run in any ANSI-compliant
   Common Lisp implementation.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are
   the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic
   environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand,
   these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL,
   by way of using a separate system definition. (In
   that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used,
   so this should run in any ANSI-compliant
   Common Lisp implementation.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New version of ContextL (v0.6)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:23:08 -0000
Hi,

I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are the new features:

+ ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand, these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL, by way of using a separate system definition. (In that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used, so this should run in any ANSI-compliant Common Lisp implementation.)

+ Added support for Embeddable Common Lisp and resurrected support for Macintosh Common Lisp. Unfortunately, the CLOS MOP of Scieneer Common Lisp is too weak, so I cannot support ContextL there (yet).

+ Dependencies on portable-threads and trivial-garbage are removed - these libraries are no longer necessary for ContextL to work.

+ Improved use of synchronization features in multi-threaded Common Lisp implementations.

+ Lots of special thanks to the following people who provided useful patches and comments: Willem Broekema, Theam Yong Chew, Alexander Gravilov, Attila Lendvai, and Tobias Rittweiler. Extra special thanks to Duane Rettig (of Franz Inc.) and Martin Simmons (of LispWorks Ld.) for helping with Allegro-specific and LispWorks-specific issues.

Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
closer-announce mailing list
closer-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 16:24:12 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGfdL-00024E-IA
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:12 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGfdC-00023r-QQ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:03 -0500
Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1NGfdA-00023l-2m
   for closer-announce@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:00 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGoDGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWf4ImBYIIBA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 22:12:33 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E685C590060
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:12:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id cSbbXRX2Wvm6 for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:12:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF81459005D
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 22:12:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:12:30 +0100
Message-Id: <FDDA4E82-A040-42AE-BC50-B1C47F26BCD4@p-cos.net>
To: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This
   is a major new release,
   with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support
   for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked,
   and ECL is now officially
   supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
X-BeenThere: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This
   is a major new release,
   with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support
   for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked,
   and ECL is now officially
   supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This
   is a major new release,
   with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support
   for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked,
   and ECL is now officially
   supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-106.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New release of Closer to MOP
   (v0.6)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:24:12 -0000
Hi,

I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This is a major new release, with a couple of substantial improvements:

+ Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on).

+ Macintosh Common Lisp has been reactivated as an open source project, and the support for MCL in Closer to MOP has been resurrected.

+ Scieneer Common Lisp is now supported to some degree as well.

+ In total, Closer to MOP now supports 9 different Common Lisp implementations: Allegro Common Lisp, CLisp, Clozure Common Lisp, CMU Common Lisp, Embeddable Common Lisp, LispWorks, Macintosh Common Lisp, Steel Bank Common Lisp, and Scieneer Common Lisp.

+ I have added support for the complete generic function invocation protocol. This includes COMPUTE-APPLICABLE-METHODS, COMPUTE-APPLICABLE-METHODS-USING-CLASSES, COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION, and COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD, and MAKE-METHOD-LAMBDA (!). On top of that, Closer to MOP adds a missing piece in the protocol, namely COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD-FUNCTION, for turning an effective method form into an actual function. Note, however, that support for the generic invocation is not available in all supported Common Lisp implementations: CMU Common Lisp, Macintosh Common Lisp and Scieneer Common Lisp unfortunately don't provide the necessary extensibility to support the protocols at all, and ECL has the slight restriction that method lambda forms have the same lambda list as the generic function for which they are defined, and not the format as specified in AMOP.

+ In previous Closer to MOP versions, the standard metobject definition macros and functions (DEFCLASS, DEFGENERIC, DEFMETHOD, ENSURE-CLASS, ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION, etc.) sometimes forced the use of the replacement 'standard' metaobject classes of Closer to MOP (STANDARD-CLASS, STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION and STANDARD-METHOD). This is now completely removed: If you don't use a :METACLASS or :GENERIC-FUNCTION-CLASS option explicitly, these defining operators will use the internal metaclasses of the respective Common Lisp implementation, under the assumption that they are usually more efficient than the replacements in Closer to MOP. If for some reason, you want to ensure to use the replacements, you have to do so explicitly. (Note: The main purpose of the replacements is to provide a common compatible basis for your own metaobject subclasses, not to be used in their own right.)

+ When synchronization is necessary, the code for Allegro Common Lisp and LispWorks now uses constructs that are compatible with their respective future SMP support.

+ In ECL and LispWorks, it is necessary to 'de-optimize' slot accesses for the reader and writer methods specified in DEFCLASS forms in order to ensure that SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS and (SETF SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS) are correctly used. This now only happens if there are actually applicable definitions available for them. Otherwise, they use the native optimized slot access.

+ Extra special thanks to Duane Rettig, Steve Haflich, and Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll for fixing extra hard bugs in extra short amount of time.

Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
closer-announce mailing list
closer-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 17:20:08 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGgVT-0006mr-LS
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:20:08 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NGgVH-0006ma-Uh; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:19:56 -0500
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1NGgVE-0006mM-FA
   for closer-announce@common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:19:54 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAKMKGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWeIQzBA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 23:08:22 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56A8590060
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 23:08:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id fcbyyQaUrREV for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 23:08:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE15B59005D
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri,  4 Dec 2009 23:08:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:08:20 +0100
Message-Id: <E811D50D-E4E6-4CDF-BE03-02074CF9679C@p-cos.net>
To: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public
   release of 'filtered functions',
   an extension of generic functions that Charlotte
   Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos,
   and myself have developed some time ago and that
   we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a
   number
   of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered
   functions, 
   because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and
   requires
   a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification
   to
   quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in
   the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library,
   that I released today as well. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0006]
   -2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public
   release of 'filtered functions',
   an extension of generic functions that Charlotte
   Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos,
   and myself have developed some time ago and that
   we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a
   number
   of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered
   functions, 
   because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and
   requires
   a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification
   to
   quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in
   the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library,
   that I released today as well. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public
   release of 'filtered functions',
   an extension of generic functions that Charlotte
   Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos,
   and myself have developed some time ago and that
   we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a
   number
   of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered
   functions, 
   because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and
   requires
   a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification
   to
   quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in
   the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library,
   that I released today as well. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New project: filtered functions
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:20:08 -0000
Hi,

I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public release of 'filtered functions', an extension of generic functions that Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos, and myself have developed some time ago and that we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a number of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered functions, because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and requires a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification to quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library, that I released today as well.

You can find filtered functions at the Closer project website at http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ - below you will find a general overview of the concept.

Filtered functions are an extension of generic functions, extended with a filtering step where the arguments received by a generic function are mapped to other values based on user-defined mapping functions. Those filtered values are then used to perform the actual selection and execution of applicable methods. Nevertheless, the methods that are eventually executed see the original objects as received by the generic function, and not the filtered ones.

Here are some examples to illustrate the expressive power of filtered functions.

Factorial
====
In order to be able to use filtered functions, we need to have filter functions that map received arguments to values that we actually want to base our dispatch on. For the factorial function, we want to distinguish between negative and positive numbers, and the number zero. For that we can just use the Common Lisp function SIGNUM that returns +1 for positive numbers, -1 for negative numbers, and just 0 for the number 0. The filtered function FAC can thus be defined as follows.

(define-filtered-function fac (n)
  (:filters (:sign #'signum)))

DEFINE-FILTERED-FUNCTION is exactly like DEFGENERIC, except that it can also define one or more filters. Here, it defines a filter with the name :SIGN wich specifices that the function SIGNUM is to be used for filtering.

We can now define methods for FAC:

(defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql +1)))
  (* n (fac (- n 1))))

(defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql 0)))
  1)

(defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql -1)))
  (error "Fac not defined for negative numbers."))

Here, we use the qualifiers :FILTER :SIGN in the method definitions to indicate that we indeed want to use the :SIGN filter for method selection. We then use EQL specializers to ensure that the method definitions are applicable for the three different cases that SIGNUM yields. Remember that the method bodies always see the original arguments, not the filtered ones, and this is why the FAC methods can do the correct computations.

State pattern
======
Filtered functions can be used to dispatch methods based on the state of an argument passed to a filtered function, which enables expressing State-like idioms. Assume the following simple CLOS class is defined for implementing a stack.

(defconstant +stack-size+ 10)

(defclass stack ()
  ((contents :initform (make-array +stack-size+)
             :reader stack-contents))
   (index :initform 0
          :accessor stack-index)))

Instances of this class have three different states: Such a stack can either be empty, or full, or anywhere in between (in 'normal' state). We can express this as a function that recognizes the state of a stack.

(defun stack-state (stack)
  (cond ((<= (stack-index stack) 0) 'empty)
        ((>= (stack-index stack) +stack-size+) 'full)
        (t 'normal)))

It is now straightforward to use stack-state in a filter named :state for the typical stack operations.

(define-filtered-function stack-push (stack value)
  (:filters (:state #'stack-state)))

(define-filtered-function stack-pop (stack)
  (:filters (:state #'stack-state)))

(define-filtered-function stack-emptyp (stack)
  (:filters (:state #'stack-state)))

We can now group the behavior of a stack according to its different states. Note that for 'normal' state, we do not need to mention the use of any filter here, because the methods are not specialized on anything specific anyway. (Filtered functions always allow for 'regular' methods alongside the filtered methods.)

;;; Normal state

(defmethod stack-push (stack value)
  (setf (aref (stack-contents stack)
              (stack-index stack))
        value)
  (incf (stack-index stack)))

(defmethod stack-pop (stack)
   (decf (stack-index stack))
   (aref (stack-contents stack)
         (stack-index stack)))

(defmethod stack-emptyp (stack)
  nil)

;;; Empty state

(defmethod stack-pop :filter :state ((stack (eql 'empty)))
  (error "Stack is empty."))

(defmethod stack-emptyp :filter :state ((stack (eql 'empty)))
  t)

;;; Full state

(defmethod stack-push :filter :state ((stack (eql 'full)) value)
  (error "Stack is full."))

Note that we used a derived state function here, that determines the state of the stack based on some of its other properties. Since filter functions can be any functions, we could also use the reader of a slot as a filter function, and thus have the behavior of a filtered function depend on the explicit state of an object.

Filtered functions can do a lot more: As already mentioned, they can use more than one filter; filter functions can see all the arguments a generic function receives; and filters can be guarded, which means that methods that use a particular filter may be completely ignored if the arguments don't fulfil a certain predicate. You can read the paper "Filtered Dispatch" at http://p-cos.net/documents/filtered-dispatch.pdf that I co-authored with Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos and Theo D'Hondt for a more thorough introduction, background information and semantics, and which also includes an extensible metacircular Lisp interpreter as an example, based on implementing EVAL as a filtered function.

Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
closer-announce mailing list
closer-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Mon Dec 14 08:36:11 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NKB5u-0007bf-N6
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:11 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NKB5m-0007aR-Rl; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:03 -0500
Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1NKB5i-0007Ax-Ak
   for closer-announce@common-lisp.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:01 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFbCJUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWGoQrBA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2009 14:35:02 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819FC590060
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id guO2CxBXjmym for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from soft64.vub.ac.be (soft64.vub.ac.be [134.184.43.164])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE6E59005D
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100
Message-Id: <93F3A5D1-42B0-4A60-A13E-541908BEF79F@p-cos.net>
To: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium
   =============	<http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org>
   May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon,
   Portugal Important Dates
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29,
   2010* + Author Notification:
   March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 
   2010* [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium
   =============	<http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org>
   May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon,
   Portugal Important Dates
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29,
   2010* + Author Notification:
   March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 
   2010* [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium
   =============	<http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org>
   May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon,
   Portugal Important Dates
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29,
   2010* + Author Notification:
   March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7,
   2010* [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] [CfP] ELS 2010
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:36:11 -0000
3rd European Lisp Symposium
                     =============               <http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org>

May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal

Important Dates 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  + Submission Deadline: *January 29, 2010*
  + Author Notification: March 1, 2010
  + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010
  + Symposium: *May 6-7, 2010*

  We hope, as in previous years, to invite authors of accepted
  research contributions to submit an extended version of their papers
  to a special issue of the Journal of Universal Computer Science
  (J.UCS).

Scope 
~~~~~~
  The purpose of the European Lisp Symposium is to provide a forum
  for the discussion and dissemination of all aspects of design,
  implementation and application of any of the Lisp dialects.  We
  encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate.

  The European Lisp Symposium 2010 invites high quality papers about
  novel research results, insights and lessons learned from practical
  applications, and educational perspectives, all involving Lisp
  dialects, including Common Lisp, Scheme, Emacs Lisp, AutoLisp,
  ISLISP, Dylan, Clojure, and so on.

  Topics include, but are not limited to:
  + Language design and implementation
  + Language integration, interoperation and deployment
  + Development methodologies, support and environments
  + Reflection, protocols and meta-level architectures
  + Lisp in Education
  + Parallel, distributed and scientific computing
  + Large and ultra-large-scale systems
  + Hardware, virtual machine and embedded applications
  + Domain-oriented programming
  + Lisp pearls
  + Experience reports and case studies

  We invite submissions (through EasyChair) in two categories:
  original contributions and tutorials.

  * Original contributions should neither have been published
    previously nor be under review in any other refereed events or
    publication.  Research papers should describe work that advances
    the current state of the art, or presents old results from a new
    perspective.  Experience papers should be of broad interest and
    should describe insights gained from substantive practical
    applications.  The programme committee will evaluate each
    contributed paper based on its relevance, significance, clarity,
    and originality.

  * Tutorial submissions should be extended abstracts of up to four
    pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest
    for at least 90 minutes and up to 180 minutes.  The programme
    committee will evaluate tutorial proposals based on the likely
    interest in the topic matter, the clarity of the presentation in
    the extended abstract, and the scope for interactive
    participation.

  The tutorials will run during the symposium on May 6, 2010.

Programme Chair 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Christophe Rhodes, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK

Local Chair 
~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Antonio Leitao, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal

Programme Committee 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  + Marco Antoniotti, Universita Milano Bicocca, Italy
  + Giuseppe Attardi, Universita di Pisa, Italy 
  + Pascal Costanza, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
  + Irene Anne Durand, Universite Bordeaux I, France
  + Marc Feeley, Universite de Montreal, Canada
  + Ron Garret, Amalgamated Widgets Unlimited, USA
  + Gregor Kiczales, University of British Columbia, Canada
  + Nick Levine, Ravenbrook Ltd, UK
  + Scott McKay, ITA Software, Inc., USA
  + Peter Norvig, Google Inc., USA
  + Kent Pitman, PTC, USA
  + Christian Queinnec, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, France
  + Robert Strandh, Universite Bordeaux I, France
  + Didier Verna, EPITA Research and Development Laboratory, France
  + Barry Wilkes, Citi, UK
  + Taiichi Yuasa, Kyoto University, Japan

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
closer-announce mailing list
closer-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Mon Dec 21 20:41:35 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NMtkk-0000aZ-NY
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:34 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NMtkb-0000aL-UE
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:26 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1NMtkY-0000aE-R4
   for rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:24 -0500
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so3910325bwz.2
   for <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.160.131 with SMTP id n3mr611512bkx.122.1261444470358; Mon, 
   21 Dec 2009 17:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:14:30 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5e9be561ba26b752
Message-ID: <b56421a00912211714p753da36ds1cbe6e5193194bd4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses
   Load as
   a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports
   do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help,
   but essentially this "fix" is against
   your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found,
   right?
   Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences
   with
   RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm
   certainly
   not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses
   Load as
   a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports
   do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help,
   but essentially this "fix" is against
   your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found,
   right?
   Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences
   with
   RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm
   certainly
   not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>,
   General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses
   Load as
   a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports
   do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help,
   but essentially this "fix" is against
   your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found,
   right?
   Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences
   with
   RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm
   certainly
   not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.1 (Was: Could
   not load file	or	assembly error)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:41:35 -0000
I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses Load as a fallback
(I had the same idea initially) and also exports do-rdnzl-collection.
Raymond, thanks again for your help, but essentially this "fix" is
against your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't
found, right?  Do you have a better idea?  (And good to hear about
your experiences with RDNZL.  I don't know of many users who deploy
RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm certainly not one of them - but I'm always
happy to hear about it.)

Seth, thanks for the report.

Cheers,
Edi.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
I just checked, and it does not appear that I used gacutil to register
rdnzl.dll.
I tried running the messagebox example, using rdnzl 0.12.2 and 0.13.
0.12.2 works, 0.13 does not. If I modify import.lisp so that
load-assembly uses the old code (with LoadWithPartialName), the
example works. Likewise if I change the code to try
LoadWithPartialName first, with Load (as used in 0.13) as a fallback.
The fallback probably won't help in the loading, but may be useful for
error trapping/reporting.
Sorry about this - I will remember to test the demo programs as well
as my own code the next time...
If you end up doing a new version instead of a rollback, it would be
good to have do-rdnzl-collection exported - it is implemented and
documented, but not exported (exactly as it was in the patch i sent,
so this, too, is my fault; again, sorry.)
On a more positive note: I'm using rdnzl for feeding documents into a
search engine, and rdnzl works just great for me - good performance,
and no sign of any memory leaks - and also reasonably easy to get
working. Thanks again for allowing me to do (almost) Microsoft-free
programming under Windows :-)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Could be due to the patch, but I think you may have to explicitly
register rdnzl.ddl (using gacutil)? I seem to remember that I had to
do that on Win7. I'll take a look on my Win7 installation.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote:
...
Hi Raymond,
I think this is due to your recent patch. �Isn't this supposed to work anymore?
Thanks,
Edi.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Seth Burleigh <seth@tewebs.com> wrote:
...
Im attempting to get this to work on windows 7. I have .net 3.5 installed
but when I try this.
(defpackage :rdnzl-test (:use :cl :rdnzl))
(in-package :rdnzl-test)
(enable-rdnzl-syntax)
(import-types "System.Windows.Forms"
������������� "MessageBox" "MessageBoxButtons" "DialogResult")
I get the error
.NET error (System.IO.FileNotFoundException): Could not load file or
assembly 'System.Windows.Forms' or one of its dependencies. The system
cannot find the file specified.
Im pretty new to all of this, though im guessing this has something to do
with setting environmental vars or something. But since you know the library
I figure you�ll probably know the solution.
Looking forward to getting this to work! Thanks!
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-devel mailing list
rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-announce mailing list
rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
...
(or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
(or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
(or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Dec 22 15:21:47 2009
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NNBEp-0003fd-4M
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:47 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NNBEj-0003fM-CA
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:41 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1NNBEg-0003fA-Vg; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:39 -0500
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so4433660bwz.2
   for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:21:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.32.204 with SMTP id e12mr6189337bkd.51.1261513292253; Tue, 
   22 Dec 2009 12:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:21:32 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5a27e73393b02961
Message-ID: <b56421a00912221221n5fe8fc75r93ddda306f3ba67b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo,
   I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo,
   I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>,
   General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM,
   Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo,
   I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.2 (Was: New
   release 0.13.1)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:21:47 -0000
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Sooo, I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like
(or [LoadWithPartialName ...]
� �(let (..)
� � � [Load ...])
Yes, that's of course better.  I should have thought of that myself...

I made a new release with this change.

Thanks and Happy Holidays,
Edi.

_______________________________________________
rdnzl-announce mailing list
rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Jan 08 07:22:29 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NTDrJ-00081Y-Dp
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:29 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NTDr3-0007xn-8I
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:13 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1NTDqt-0007vp-0R
   for tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:03 -0500
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so12241246bwz.2
   for <tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:21:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.15.146 with SMTP id k18mr6471039bka.197.1262951683249; 
   Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:54:43 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 24c6b268f2a3ff51
Message-ID: <b56421a01001080354m4f6ddaf9yd055e922fbf0822c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV
   <tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net>, 
   tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  As pre-announced in December,
   Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out.
   Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches,
   suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year, Edi. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  As pre-announced in December,
   Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out.
   Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches,
   suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year,
   Edi. tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  As pre-announced in December,
   Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out.
   Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches,
   suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year,
   Edi. tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] New Hunchentoot release
   1.1.0
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:22:29 -0000
As pre-announced in December, Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out.  Lots of
changes, see documentation.  Thanks to all who sent patches,
suggestions, or bug reports.

Happy New Year,
Edi.

_______________________________________________
tbnl-announce site list
tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed Jan 20 08:37:33 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NXakX-00021T-JE
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:33 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NXakR-000219-9o; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:27 -0500
Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1NXakO-000213-Nq
   for closer-announce@common-lisp.net; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:25 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFmKVkuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADXe4Q2BA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2010 14:37:18 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC3590060
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id wYAVHD7HO-8D for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from soft64.vub.ac.be (soft64.vub.ac.be [134.184.43.164])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D86459005D
   for <closer-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100
Message-Id: <D5C0F55B-CA99-4725-A4FC-FF5D22AEB210@p-cos.net>
To: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Spam-Score: -103.2 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61,
   which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries
   will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well,
   provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.2 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
   [score: 0.2558]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: closer-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61,
   which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries
   will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well,
   provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61,
   which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries
   will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well,
   provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] Closer to MOP and ContextL:
   Support for	LispWorks	6.0.
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:37:34 -0000
Hello,

I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61, which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well, provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis.

Enjoy,
Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
closer-announce mailing list
closer-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
...
Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) >
   renames
   missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them
   I
   musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad
   Gateway response, which seems odd,
   but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem
   to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18,
   2010 at 5:52 AM, 
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my
   checkout
   was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check
   if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes,
   we can make this an official
   release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, 
   yes,
...
...
...
...
...
seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these
...
...
...
...
...
> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes,
...
...
...
A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/util.lisp
A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc
A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository
A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/dav.png
A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) >
   renames
   missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them
   I
   musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad
   Gateway response, which seems odd,
   but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem
   to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18,
   2010 at 5:52 AM, 
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my
   checkout
   was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check
   if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes,
   we can make this an official
   release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, 
   yes,
...
...
...
...
...
seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these
...
...
...
...
...
> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes,
...
...
...
A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/util.lisp
A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc
A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository
A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/dav.png
A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) >
   renames
   missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them
   I
   musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad
   Gateway response, which seems odd,
   but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem
   to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18,
   2010 at 5:52 AM, 
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my
   checkout
   was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check
   if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes,
   we can make this an official
   release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And,
   yes,
...
...
...
...
...
seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these
...
...
...
...
...
> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes,
...
...
...
A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/util.lisp
A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc
A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository
A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A
   cl-webdav/doc/dav.png
A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A
   cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Feb 21 08:09:51 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NjBZG-0000Dw-G8
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:09:50 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NjBWN-0008K8-0s
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:06:51 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1NjBTn-0007At-5W; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:04:15 -0500
Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so1066965bwz.2
   for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:04:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.4.209 with SMTP id 17mr1225211bks.175.1266757444119; Sun, 
   21 Feb 2010 05:04:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda@mail.gmail.com>
References: <75b4567b0911151829u4fd9358bufff4bd7c482cd849@mail.gmail.com>
   <b56421a00911152306u36ab78b6kfef09f449269016f@mail.gmail.com>
   <1266437462.7337.3.camel@mhflaptop01>
   <b56421a01002180235xeab0a0tc82d0555a9da928f@mail.gmail.com>
   <1266489921.7418.8.camel@mhflaptop01>
   <b56421a01002180252r393c4b49g7a234a8347883f98@mail.gmail.com>
   <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:04:03 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9166f2dc73f289a3
Message-ID: <b56421a01002210504n2e93d675p41f485fbeeb5e512@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: Matthew Curry <mjcurry@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks,
   I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0)
   of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On
   Sat, 
   Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry@gmail.com> wrote: > Edi,
   the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf
   Mattes <rm@seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100,
   Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM,
   Ralf Mattes <rm@seid-online.de>
   wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to
   handlers.lisp
   from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to
   resources.lisp
   the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>>
   http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial
   so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh
   svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co
   svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks,
   I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0)
   of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On
   Sat, 
   Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry@gmail.com> wrote: > Edi,
   the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf
   Mattes <rm@seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100,
   Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM,
   Ralf Mattes <rm@seid-online.de>
   wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to
   handlers.lisp
   from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to
   resources.lisp
   the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>>
   http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial
   so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh
   svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co
   svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV
   <tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net>, tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Thanks,
   I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0)
   of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On
   Sat, 
   Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry@gmail.com> wrote: > Edi,
   the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf
   Mattes <rm@seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100,
   Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM,
   Ralf Mattes <rm@seid-online.de>
   wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to
   handlers.lisp
   from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to
   resources.lisp
   the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>>
   http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial
   so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh
   svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co
   svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] [hunchentoot-devel]
   PATCH: Some	minor	fixes for cl-webdav under hunchentoot 1.0
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:09:51 -0000
Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of
cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Edi,
Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*)
renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). �One
of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway.
copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all
other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. �patch attached.
-Matt
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote:
...
I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. �I just
tried to clean up the mess. �Please check if it works now. �If you're
OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. �(Now that
I know that there /is/ one user... :)
And, yes, the URL should be right.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes <rm@seid-online.de> wrote:
...
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote:
...
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes <rm@seid-online.de> wrote:
...
What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from
that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp
seem to be there. How can that happen?
Aren't these the ones you were looking for?
http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
Hallo Edi,
yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed
the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this:
ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav
A � �cl-webdav/resources.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/properties.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/util.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/packages.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt
A � �cl-webdav/doc
A � �cl-webdav/doc/index.html
A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS
A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository
A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root
A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries
A � �cl-webdav/doc/dav.png
A � �cl-webdav/handlers.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/xml.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/specials.lisp
A � �cl-webdav/cl-webdav.asd
A � �cl-webdav/file-resources.lisp
Checked out revision 4511.
ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ grep content-type cl-webdav/handlers.lisp
� � �(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" � � � � � � � � � � �<---- What happend to the patch?
� � �(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8"
� � �(setf (content-type) (resource-content-type resource))
�(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8"
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �(content-type) nil)
Something seems utterly strange here. BTW, that svn url is the one used
in bknr's "ediware" svn repository - is this out of date?
Cheers RalfD
_______________________________________________
tbnl-devel site list
tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
_______________________________________________
tbnl-announce site list
tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sat Feb 27 14:09:17 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NlS2O-0003CX-NA
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:16 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1NlS2J-0003CH-44; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:11 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f214.google.com ([209.85.220.214])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <vsedach@gmail.com>) id 1NlS2G-0003Bx-Um
   for parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net;
   Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:09 -0500
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1200586fxm.2
   for <parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:09:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.167.66 with SMTP id f2mr200217hbe.16.1267296319068; Sat, 
   27 Feb 2010 10:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:45:19 -0500
Message-ID: <c07e645b1002271045q3a1e1d9dr3563aa085a6a861e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com>
To: parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the
   long-awaited implicit
   return functionality, multiple value return,
   a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format,
   and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now
   been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version
   2.1). Enjoy! [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the
   long-awaited implicit
   return functionality, multiple value return,
   a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format,
   and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now
   been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version
   2.1). Enjoy! [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the
   long-awaited implicit
   return functionality, multiple value return,
   a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format,
   and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now
   been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version
   2.1). Enjoy! [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript version
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:09:17 -0000
Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit
return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and
updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming
scheme has now been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new
release is version 2.1). Enjoy!

Vladimir

_______________________________________________
parenscript-announce mailing list
parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue May 18 07:21:42 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OEKrm-0007Kb-9L
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:42 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OEKrg-0007KM-Vb
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:37 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1OEKrf-0007KB-4x
   for rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:35 -0400
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so943030fxm.10
   for <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 18 May 2010 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.23.15 with SMTP id p15mr14983bkb.115.1274180373011; Tue, 
   18 May 2010 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:59:32 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tOacl51J9bwzhfYf65CEkinVNvM
Message-ID: <AANLkTimiSAc5umnT2P9vEEyMg9xnTKrEgJ6eEDSYcJkl@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Ugh,
   I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and
   released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Ugh,
   I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and
   released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Ugh,
   I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and
   released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.3 (Was: Patch:
   bug fix	for	do-rdnzl-collection)
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:21:42 -0000
Ugh, I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and released 0.13.3.

Sorry for the long delay.

Edi.

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote:
...
Hi Raymond,
Thanks for the patch. �I'll be out of town for about a week and will
take care of this when I'm back. �Please remind me if I don't... :)
Edi.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> wrote:
...
The attached patch fixes a bug in do-rdnzl-collection. Without this
patch, do-rdnzl-collection would stop processing after a collection
member that evaluated to nil.
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-devel mailing list
rdnzl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel
_______________________________________________
rdnzl-announce mailing list
rdnzl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed May 19 11:40:14 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OElNV-00063Q-M9
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:13 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OElNP-000630-OC; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:08 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1OElNL-0005vD-8S; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:03 -0400
Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2110616ewy.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.50.13 with SMTP id c13mr6833493muk.63.1274282213345; Wed, 
   19 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:16:53 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SWwPPEtMLXHEyP4y5AqxfRWkL60
Message-ID: <AANLkTilOgQ6EoRm3nwzx0bqrNSrk7UbcgstkqrhYS8qN@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog
   below, 
   thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0
   2010-05-19
   Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https
   through
   a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a
   request
   through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method
   to
   render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on
   Lotus webservers) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog
   below, 
   thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0
   2010-05-19
   Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https
   through
   a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a
   request
   through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method
   to
   render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on
   Lotus webservers) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog
   below, 
   thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0
   2010-05-19
   Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https
   through
   a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a
   request
   through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method
   to
   render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on
   Lotus webservers) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New version 1.2.0
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:40:14 -0000
Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual.  ChangeLog below, thanks to
anyone who sent patches or bug reports.

Edi.

Version 1.2.0
2010-05-19
Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis)
Enabled https through a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert)
Bugfix for redirect of a request through a proxy (Bill St. Clair)
Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE
Safer method to render URIs
Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on Lotus webservers)

_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed May 19 11:49:52 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OElWp-0007Va-W7
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:52 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OElWj-0007UR-Ij; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:45 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1OElWg-0007Tt-51; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:43 -0400
Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2116117ewy.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.174.30 with SMTP id w30mr6824708mue.57.1274282703839; Wed, 
   19 May 2010 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:25:03 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9qN7EZrPBTxiCDHiVlFrRZoJClg
Message-ID: <AANLkTikSPoGyHBLQ9HbkEE0eD1bmOpfsa14RA5a3uY34@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  And, again on weitz.de,
   there's also a new release of Chunga.
   Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  And, again on weitz.de,
   there's also a new release of Chunga.
   Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly)
   drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  And, again on weitz.de,
   there's also a new release of Chunga.
   Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly)
   drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New Chunga version 1.1.1
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:49:52 -0000
And, again on weitz.de, there's also a new release of Chunga.

Version 1.1.1
2010-05-19
Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly)

_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed May 19 15:42:08 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OEp9c-0007LA-8R
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:42:08 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OEp9P-0007Ks-V9; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:41:56 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1OEp9M-0007KY-Tl; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:41:53 -0400
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so2738071fxm.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.80.16 with SMTP id d16mr828465mub.53.1274298105653; Wed, 
   19 May 2010 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 21:41:45 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: JKay_czLiHZaGLmhudeS-xcbxEc
Message-ID: <AANLkTimGMjDJSgIHx16socar5pd_BJWIuCnDTk-5Ttdx@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Yeah, sorry,
   I should have been more careful. At least this
   was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the
   warm
   and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :)
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Yeah, sorry,
   I should have been more careful. At least this
   was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the
   warm
   and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :)
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Yeah, sorry,
   I should have been more careful. At least this
   was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the
   warm
   and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :)
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New version 1.2.1
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:42:08 -0000
Yeah, sorry, I should have been more careful.  At least this was
reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the
warm and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch
mistakes... :)

Thanks.  Bugfix release online.

Edi.

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Zach Beane <xach@xach.com> wrote:
...
Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> writes:
...
Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. �ChangeLog below, thanks to
anyone who sent patches or bug reports.
This version does not compile for me; make-ssl-stream in util.lisp has
an extra paren at the end of line 334.
Zach
_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sat Jul 10 06:30:08 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OXXJv-0001Nd-RX
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:30:08 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OXXJb-0001NR-WF; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:29:48 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1OXXJP-0001N9-1n; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:29:37 -0400
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1568299bwz.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.179.19 with SMTP id bo19mr8127373bkb.209.1278756371319; 
   Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.100.212 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:06:11 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: n8x_dY7aRZMgIHH5vU9z7N-y_BU
Message-ID: <AANLkTinds5BBg0pxUhKuoUnGD9F8IuiD6JAA5jJXtA2-@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>, 
   General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This
   is a
   bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This
   is a
   bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt
   drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This
   is a
   bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt
   drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
   http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce
   [...] Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New Drakma release 1.2.2
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:30:08 -0000
There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de.  This is a bugfix release.

ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt

_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
...
I want to re-raise
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Thu Aug 05 16:02:33 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Oh6e7-0000iV-RN
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:32 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Oh6dz-0000iA-R4; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:24 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>)
   id 1Oh6dv-0000hW-Ix; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:20 -0400
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so4586512fxm.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.126.223 with SMTP id d31mr7418165bks.146.1281036768699; 
   Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.81.133 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:32:48 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qKrZqSYWsFZCqDbU58dKqWS_cp0
Message-ID: <AANLkTikoiY3dT825ib=YqquUQwBS8gZoETzXyGHEcPRq@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and
   I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29,
   2010 at 11:22 AM, 
   Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,
   the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older
   version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with >
   *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*.
...
But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the
...
UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still
   remains
   in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > >
   CL-USER>
   (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* >
   CL-USER>
   (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name >
   "lang"
   :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie
   :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*)
#<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think,
...
SET-DIFFERENCE in
mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is >
   highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is,
   that SET-DIFFERENCE and
   that this is
   a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example,
   this case will constantly return the first set (see > below),
   so either the
   code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > >
   CL-USER>
   (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" >
   :value
   "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie
   :name
   "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list
   (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
...
...
Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list
drakma-devel@common-lisp.net > [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
I want to re-raise
(make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain
   "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should
   also be fixed, especially,
   since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with
   GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards,
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and
   I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29,
   2010 at 11:22 AM, 
   Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,
   the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older
   version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with >
   *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*.
...
But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the
...
UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still
   remains
   in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > >
   CL-USER>
   (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* >
   CL-USER>
   (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name >
   "lang"
   :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie
   :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*)
#<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think,
...
SET-DIFFERENCE in
mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is >
   highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is,
   that SET-DIFFERENCE and
   that this is
   a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example,
   this case will constantly return the first set (see > below),
   so either the
   code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > >
   CL-USER>
   (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" >
   :value
   "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie
   :name
   "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list
   (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
...
...
Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list
drakma-devel@common-lisp.net > [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
...
I want to re-raise
(make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain
   "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should
   also be fixed, especially,
   since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with
   GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards,
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: drakma-announce <drakma-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and
   I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29,
   2010 at 11:22 AM, 
   Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,
   the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older
   version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with >
   *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*.
...
But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the
...
UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still
   remains
   in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > >
   CL-USER>
   (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* >
   CL-USER>
   (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name >
   "lang"
   :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie
   :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*)
#<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think,
...
SET-DIFFERENCE in
mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is >
   highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is,
   that SET-DIFFERENCE and
   that this is
   a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example,
   this case will constantly return the first set (see > below),
   so either the
   code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > >
   CL-USER>
   (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" >
   :value
   "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie
   :name
   "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list
   (make-instance
   'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
...
...
Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list
drakma-devel@common-lisp.net > [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
(make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain
   "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/;
   domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should
   also be fixed, especially,
   since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with
   GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards,
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New release 1.2.3 [Was:
   duplicate cookies	problem	with proposed patch]
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Reply-To: edi@agharta.de
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:02:33 -0000
Thanks for the patch.  I'm back from vacation now and I've just
released 1.2.3 which fixes this.

Edi.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Hi,
I want to re-raise the topic of duplicate cookies.� I've had this issue with
the older version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with
*remove-duplicate-cookies-p*.
But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the
mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is
highlighted in the attached diff.� The problem is, that SET-DIFFERENCE and
UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES.
It still remains in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this:
CL-USER> (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar))
*COOKIES*
CL-USER> (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name
"lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
������������������������������������� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name
"lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))
������������������������������� *cookies*)
#<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}>
I think, that this is a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example,
SET-DIFFERENCE in this case will constantly return the first set (see
below), so either the code should be simplified or the test argument should
be added.
CL-USER> (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang"
:value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
����������������������������� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang"
:value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))
����������������������� (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang"
:value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")
����������������������������� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang"
:value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")))
(#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>
�#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>)
So, I believe, that this part should also be fixed, especially, since
UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with GET-COOKIES.
Best regards,
Vsevolod
_______________________________________________
drakma-devel mailing list
drakma-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel
_______________________________________________
drakma-announce mailing list
drakma-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
...
doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of
   Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of
   Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
...
doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of
   Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Aug 24 03:48:48 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OnoFU-0007Y3-Dd
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:48 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1OnoFJ-0007Wj-2G
   for announcements@common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:37 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <nhabedi@gmail.com>) id 1OnoFA-0007Wd-0u
   for tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:28 -0400
Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so5137556iwn.10
   for <tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.192.80 with SMTP id dp16mr8082164ibb.39.1282634766364;
   Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.177.18 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:26:06 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YbfnFR59tap4uHfmpugXEwOyGWA
Message-ID: <AANLkTi�MRrVG9NnZ+thmmhLEU3-yZi5Z4Pp7R22Zp5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
To: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV
   <tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM,
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
   wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to
   actually
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM,
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
   wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to
   actually
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM,
   Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de>
   wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to
   actually
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] New release
   1.1.1	[Was:	usocket:timeout-errors and *catch-errors-p*]
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:48:49 -0000
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote:
...
I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to actually
doing it. �Maybe I should just do it now...
Version 1.1.1 of Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/.

Edi.

_______________________________________________
tbnl-announce site list
tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Oct 17 15:44:11 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1P7Z9O-00047q-U5
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:44:11 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1P7Z9B-00047S-IB; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:57 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <vsedach@gmail.com>)
   id 1P7Z99-00047I-Ei; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:56 -0400
Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so151150bwz.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.69.200 with SMTP id a8mr3626053bkj.36.1287344633195; Sun,
   17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.10.144 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:53 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinDEuVmBVSh7WHNLRS_g6FgimQp4d7NjFgOXsi4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@gmail.com>
To: parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel@common-lisp.net>,
   parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release,
   2.2.
   It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated.
   Implicit
   return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported
   unfixed
   bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make
   expressionization
   work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the
   way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release,
   2.2.
   It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated.
   Implicit
   return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported
   unfixed
   bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make
   expressionization
   work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the
   way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release,
   2.2.
   It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated.
   Implicit
   return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported
   unfixed
   bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make
   expressionization
   work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the
   way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript release:
   2.2
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:44:11 -0000
Hello,

I've decided to make a new Parenscript release, 2.2. It includes
mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated. Implicit return
should hopefully work better since last release.

All reported unfixed bugs will go into the next release. Thinking
about how to make expressionization work properly, and the latest bug
reported by Scott, I realized that the way special forms work will
need to change somewhat.

Starting with 2.2, there will no longer be packaged releases for
ASDF-Install (it's not any extra work making them, I just want to
encourage people to use Quicklisp).

Vladimir

_______________________________________________
parenscript-announce mailing list
parenscript-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sat Feb 05 18:16:29 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1PlrMi-0003HY-Bp
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:29 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1PlrMW-0003H9-OY; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:16 -0500
Received: from smtp07.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.129]
   helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>) id 1PlrMU-0003Gy-AO
   for clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:14 -0500
Received: from elcleaves ([90.18.79.218]) by mwinf5d14 with ME
   id 4NZn1g00H4icZ5W03NZoV1; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:33:49 +0100
From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>
To: clfswm-devel@common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
Organization: None
Mail-Copies-To: never
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:45:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87bp2qxfqi.fsf@common-lisp.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everybody,
   I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release:
   http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.2 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everybody,
   I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release:
   http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.2 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi everybody,
   I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release:
   http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-3.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1102 released.
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:16:29 -0000
Hi everybody,

I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release:

  http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz

Since the last release, changes are mainly bugs fixes and internals
improvements. 

There is also some new code in contrib:
  - keyb_fr.lisp      to enable french keyboard layout
  - mpd.lisp          to handle the mpd (Music Player Daemon)
  - xmms.lisp         to handle xmms
  - reboot-halt.lisp  a menu to reboot/halt the machine
  - osd.lisp          the system I use to make On Screen Display in
                      videos 
  - server/           a client/server system to manage clfswm remotely
                      or with scripts. 

And now, CLFSWM can run another window manager while running (this can
be useful sometimes with some applications (for example java app))

The full ChangeLog is here:

  http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ChangeLog

As always, the main site is here:
  http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/

And the clfswm trac is available here:
  http://trac.common-lisp.net/clfswm/

Have fun,

Philippe

_______________________________________________
clfswm-announce mailing list
clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Feb 15 15:28:19 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1PpRVQ-0001XB-3n
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:28:19 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1PpRV1-0001Ww-JZ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:27:51 -0500
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1PpRUv-0001Wl-G2
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:27:49 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgGAMpiWk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACXPo4bc7xchV4EjysM
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2011 20:44:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B22590554
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id 63PpanKQqqzq for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (205.27-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.27.205])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E1B5590542
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:32 +0100
Message-Id: <43DD627C-399B-4BF2-BCA2-8C6ED1729CA3@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3"
   has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR
   document 7. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on March 29, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of
   this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3"
   has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR
   document 7. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on March 29, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of
   this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3"
   has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR
   document 7. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on March 29, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of
   this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 7 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:28:20 -0000
The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 7. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 29, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document.

Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Software Languages Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Mar 29 18:36:36 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q4hWe-0007uC-C9
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:36 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q4hWN-0007tu-2P; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:22 -0400
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1Q4hWK-0007to-Qo
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:17 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUNANBckk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYUIYXhmp3vF2FagSQSgw
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2011 00:36:14 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03275905B0
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id 6tr8SBIz6gW9 for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (180.155-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.155.180])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 525C8590542
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:09 +0200
Message-Id: <5AA04AEE-2F77-47DB-83BF-CFCBE180A845@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -103.8 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.8 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
   [score: 0.0186]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section
   22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 7 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:36:37 -0000
The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Apr 01 13:14:30 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q5hvW-00040B-MU
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:30 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q5hvN-0003zp-9Z; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:17 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1Q5hvK-0003zc-GY; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:15 -0400
Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so658474pzk.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.172.20 with SMTP id u20mr3315217wfe.14.1301678047966;
   Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.149.61] (m228-146p.163.com [220.232.228.146])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2sm3151840wfd.8.2011.04.01.10.14.04
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 01:14:02 +0800
Message-Id: <5776C442-9D7A-4043-91A0-3899AFD48FB4@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -103.1 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, 
   I'm pleased
   to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the
   availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP,
   and we have implemented too versions:
   the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful
   for
   those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink
   and most Linux distributions) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -103.1 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, 
   I'm pleased
   to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the
   availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP,
   and we have implemented too versions:
   the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful
   for
   those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink
   and most Linux distributions) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.1 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -103.2 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann,
   I'm pleased
   to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the
   availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP,
   and we have implemented too versions:
   the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful
   for
   those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink
   and most Linux distributions) [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.2 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.1
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:14:31 -0000
Hello everyone,

With permission from Erik Huelsmann, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.1

The major point in this release is the availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP, and we have implemented too versions: the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion.  The FFI version will be useful for those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink and most Linux distributions)

There're also some important fixes since the 0.5.0 release, especially for SBCL.

Major changes since 0.5.0:

 * New feature: [CLISP] UDP (Datagram) support based on FFI (Win/Mac/Linux), no RAWSOCK needed.
 * Enhancement: SOCKET-SERVER return a second value (socket) when calling in new-thread mode.
 * Enhancement: [CLISP] Full support of DNS helper functions (GET-HOST-BY-NAME, ...) added.
 * Enhancement: [CLISP] Better network error type detection based on OS error code.
 * Enhancement: [LispWorks] Better network error type detection based on OS error code.
 * Bugfix: Fixed wrong macro expansions of {IP|PORT}-{FROM|TO}-OCTET-BUFFER functions (since 0.4.0)
 * Bugfix: SOCKET-CONNECT didn't set CONNECTED-P for datagram usockets on most backends.
 * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixes for "SBCL/Win32: finalizer problem, etc", by Anton Kovalenko <anton@sw4me.com>
 * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixed SOCKET-SERVER (UDP) on SBCL due to a issue in SOCKET-CONNECT when HOST is NIL.
 * Bugfix: [SBCL] SOCKET-CONNECT's TIMEOUT argument now works as a "connection timeout", thanks to Nikodemus Siivola.
 * Bugfix: [CMUCL] Fixed SOCKET-SEND on unconnected usockets under Unicode version of CMUCL.
 * Bugfix: [CLISP] Fixed and confirmed UDP (Datagram) support (RAWSOCK version).

We special thanks to:

	Anton Kovalenko <anton@sw4me.com>

for his professional fix on the issue "SBCL/Win32: finalizer problem, etc" [1].

If you want to download this release, please check out

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/

The API documentation page on the website is actually quite new:

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml

As usual, I hope more and more people use USOCKET as part of their Lisp applications, and any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. If you use USOCKET, please let us know what for.

And, if there's any historical issue which haven't been solved, please feel free to remind me.

And below is a roadmap for future USOCKET releases (ignore the order):

 * Add UDP (Datagram) support for Digitool MCL;
 * The DFFI version of ECL backend without calling C compilers;
 * New backend: Symbolics Lisp Machine (because ASDF support it now);
 * New backend: XCL (is it ready?!);
 * New backend: IOlib;
 * New API: SOCKET-OPTION for setting/getting various socket options.

Let me know if you have other ideas...

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.usocket.devel/316

_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Apr 03 15:19:47 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q6Spv-0000TP-01
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:47 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Q6SpW-0000T2-NG; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:22 -0400
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1Q6SpP-0000Sv-Cw
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:19 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HACK8mE2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYYIx+d8AYhWsEkHIM
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2011 21:19:14 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E215905B0
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Apr 2011 21:19:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id mLvwKkZGueX9 for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Apr 2011 21:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (71.99-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.99.71])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89B60590542
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Apr 2011 21:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:11 +0200
Message-Id: <152A1549-9064-41E4-89BC-C4A9FC2F3084@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp"
   has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR
   document 8. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on May 15, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp"
   has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR
   document 8. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on May 15, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp"
   has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR
   document 8. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage
   and will be finalized on May 15, 2011,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 8 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:19:47 -0000
The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 8. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on May 15, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue May 10 13:56:34 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QJrAf-0003vy-KP
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:33 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QJrAT-0003vY-9R; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:21 -0400
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1QJrAN-0003vK-Oz
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:17 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoAIAP91yU2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYG41wd6dzn2GGDwSUCQ6KOQ
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 10 May 2011 19:56:14 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BA359056E
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id KQUp0jU4B494 for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (240.53-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.53.240])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EDC590542
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:12 +0200
Message-Id: <69F1E683-30CE-4223-A1C9-C0AAFF2E4DEE@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -103.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted
   by
   Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the
   CDR
   process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
   [score: 0.4428]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted
   by
   Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the
   CDR
   process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted
   by
   Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the
   CDR
   process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:56:34 -0000
The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed May 11 09:26:51 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QK9RA-00075F-Lt
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:26:51 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QK9QH-00074Y-Ue; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:25:59 -0400
Received: from mail-pv0-f179.google.com ([74.125.83.179])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1QK9QC-00074O-Hv; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:25:52 -0400
Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so248299pvf.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.60.135 with SMTP id h7mr4540705pbr.457.1305120341714;
   Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.149.61] ([42.99.128.2])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a20sm5520244pbu.59.2011.05.11.06.25.38
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:25:35 +0800
Message-Id: <34C9222A-DBC2-43BD-B73F-30B0A2C4587E@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -103.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, 
   a new
   version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this
   release, 
   the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL,
   CLISP; 
   there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard,
   with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -103.4 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, 
   a new
   version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this
   release, 
   the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL,
   CLISP; 
   there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard,
   with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.4 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -103.5 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2,
   a new
   version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this
   release, 
   the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL,
   CLISP; 
   there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard,
   with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-103.5 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.2
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:26:51 -0000
Hello everyone,

I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, a new version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp.

In this release, the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL, CLISP; there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard, with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now.

Major changes since 0.5.1:

* General: [SBCL] SOCKET-CONNECT's TIMEOUT argument was limited on non-Windows platforms.
* Bugfix: [CLISP] WAIT-FOR-INPUT now functions right (with/without READY-ONLY), this made Hunchentoot working on CLISP. (Thanks to Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru>)
* Bugfix: [ABCL] Fix SOCKET-ACCEPT to follow the documented API so that when called without an :ELEMENT-TYPE argument. (Thanks to Mark Evenson, the ABCL developer)
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed SOCKET-ACCEPT (Windows only) on WAIT-FOR-INPUTed sockets.
* Bugfix: [SBCL, ECL] Fixed wrongly STATE set/unset for WAIT-FOR-INPUT on Windows (report by Elliott Slaughter)
* Enhancement: Additional NAME keyword argument for SOCKET-SERVER for setting the server thread name.
* Enhancement: [ABCL] GET-ADDRESS now works with underlying IP6 addresses.
* Enhancement: [CLISP] missing GET-LOCAL-* methods for STREAM-SERVER-USOCKET was now added.

We give special thanks to:

	Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter@gmail.com>

for his two bug reports on WAIT-FOR-INPUT (SBCL/Windows) with unit test code, and these code are now part of USOCKET-TEST.

If you want to download this release, please checkout

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/

The API documentation page is here:

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml

As usual, I hope more and more people use USOCKET as part of their Lisp applications, and any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. If you use USOCKET, please let us know what for.

And, if there's any historical issue which haven't been solved, please feel free to remind me.

And below is a roadmap for future USOCKET releases (ignore the order):

* Add UDP (Datagram) support for Digitool MCL;
* The DFFI version of ECL backend without calling C compilers;
* New backends: Symbolics Lisp Machine, XCL and IOlib;
* New API: SOCKET-OPTION for setting/getting various socket options (already exist in trunk (0.6))

Let me know if you have other ideas.

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)

_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed May 11 13:10:55 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QKCw2-0007rV-KA
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:55 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QKCvs-0007r6-Mz; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:45 -0400
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1QKCvm-0007qt-PO
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:42 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGq5yk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACmDHeIcL96hhAElAkOijw
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 11 May 2011 19:10:37 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7DB59056E;
   Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id cSiUU64IB0MI; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (86.90-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.90.86])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E429590542;
   Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=2GdVADkk1ENayta8CFDv0geNHGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:30 +0200
Message-Id: <EF8E218B-13A8-4442-8C3A-AC6B4C2A76A5@p-cos.net>
References: <69F1E683-30CE-4223-A1C9-C0AAFF2E4DEE@p-cos.net>
   <BANLkTi=2GdVADkk1ENayta8CFDv0geNHGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Drew Crampsie <drewc@tech.coop>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error,
   it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error,
   it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Cc: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error,
   it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-104.6 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
   [score: 0.0000]
   -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce]   CDR 9 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, 
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:10:55 -0000
Hi Drew,

Thanks for catching this error, it was indeed a copy/paste issue.

Best,
Pascal

On 10 May 2011, at 22:15, Drew Crampsie wrote:
...
Hey Pascal,
I noticed the <title/> on the page still refers to CDR 8, probably a
cut/paste mishap.
Cheers,
drewc
On 10 May 2011 10:56, Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net> wrote:
...
The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document.
--
Pascal Costanza
_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce
_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun May 15 13:26:16 2011
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QLhtH-0001ey-WD
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:16 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1QLht4-0001ei-F1; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:02 -0700
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1QLhsy-0001eY-74
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:00 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQHAJMp0E2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYD44Fd6hynhWGGQSUMg6KSA
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A34B59056E
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id yPC4EKSNMkAA for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (154.93-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.93.154])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 693E3590542
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:52 +0200
Message-Id: <8C36770C-9333-4693-97C7-28ABD1D28DA9@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for
   Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 8 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:26:16 -0000
The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Jun 26 07:09:00 2011
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Qaq1D-0001MM-Q7
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:59 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Qaq10-0001M1-O3; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:47 -0700
Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1Qaq0x-0001Lt-69
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:45 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiwKAHc0B06GuCsB/2dsb2JhbABTmFuGZYgHd4h2oVCeJ4YwBJZjDosv
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1])
   by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE75905C3
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be
Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id 29NA0MaRlyIl for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (129.99-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
   [87.64.99.129])
   by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6F55905BF
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:39 +0200
Message-Id: <7AEDFE72-AAFC-40B1-9616-B66FFAAD5859@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been
   finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and cannot be
   changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been
   finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and cannot be
   changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net",
   has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been
   finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and cannot be
   changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:09:00 -0000
The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Aug 12 23:16:33 2011
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Qs7WL-0001R8-Pb
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:33 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Qs7W6-0001Qm-07; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:21 -0700
Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1Qs7W2-0001Qd-ML; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:16 -0700
Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so3254873iyf.30
   for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
   h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id
   :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
   bh�I8F9xkCprA+Bdc92xrsD3OMoAZZc8LtlsBsIqMqI8=;
   b=no+DHUDA5tB4iVK5xU1clRW41HQkkq1lxokdcPLqi6QIHUdLS2RK/5B7yCD4BOq7e1
   +WdUu9uidZlyiC1+y6k9RVKV5OuR5FRTXQNd7YxmOdKZQY5+I+NkvUhKaxktu1BA0D4B
   YvYcgAngLncSeG0qR82fNcu0lSn8sAM8YwCfgReceived: by 10.42.97.8 with SMTP id l8mr1776914icn.3.1313216167848;
   Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.86])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ib5sm2730720icc.0.2011.08.12.23.16.04
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:15:54 +0800
Message-Id: <D58D498A-B521-46BD-BBE6-A8A8577A62BC@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET,
   version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET,
   version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET,
   version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.3
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:16:34 -0000
Hello people,

This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3

Changes:

* Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed SOCKET-LISTEN on vector addresses like #(0 0 0 0)
* Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed WAIT-FOR-INPUT on passive sockets (stream-server-usocket)
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed using UDP in delivered applications (thanks to Camille Troillard and Martin Simmons, this is from the legacy LispWorks-UDP project).
* Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixed for "SBCL data flush problem", reported by Robert Brown and confirmed by Nikodemus Siivola.

Special thanks to:

	Robert Brown <robert.brown@gmail.com>

for his reporting and patching on "SBCL data flush problem".

If you want to download this release, please checkout

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/

or just wait for new Quicklisp releases.

The API documentation page is still here:

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml

Any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.

P.S. Now I have a full-time Lisp job in China:)

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)

_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sat Oct 01 08:04:52 2011
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1RA17U-0003Aj-O9
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:52 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1RA17B-0003AL-Pg; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:33 -0700
Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1RA179-0003A1-NY; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:32 -0700
Received: by ywn1 with SMTP id 1so2324246ywn.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
   h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id
   :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
   bh=NY5s9KUW7GG0aeooYy1nO+pEeRW0eY/K4M+SlQ/UVDQ=;
   b=q9PGNbGkEWTsefk1fgo00zWMo8eY1Jn0CU2OVIisVXtfdD3tSzSpeH99PyjQGZXFt7
   TKgVocNZRD+FMgWved55ZjmntBoRheES7oVQqcqVkzdg1IL5znUqYgrLpuBrRjV+Z58N
   +SuCcI+nDOLPB7/qdtdhwxujjX15uxWh01CqgReceived: by 10.68.19.100 with SMTP id d4mr66851426pbe.34.1317481465855;
   Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.28])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lh6sm30811299pbb.12.2011.10.01.08.04.07
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:04:00 +0800
Message-Id: <A7A8DFBC-69CC-4BC1-9AA3-D73BC45F5005@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release
   for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release
   for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi,
   Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release
   for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.4
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:04:53 -0000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...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Mon Feb 27 07:23:36 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1S22QK-0003P0-3j
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:36 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1S22Pw-0003O2-Eu; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:12 -0800
Received: from mail-pw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1S22Ps-0003N9-Aa; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:10 -0800
Received: by pbcxa12 with SMTP id xa12so3240502pbc.10
   for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
   h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id
   :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
   bh=guUwyVsUIQIlN8EAw6J0uyxUfXbREnhKthLixgQjEaw=;
   b=GM8sCa/FeE/4KJE4uWZa3sjUJpUkxKWCIboYbcajPDo7sMlMq5/HaLeDSo095NmCmK
   G060gKitnBGD6cpOJuS2bzrKKW9CdLTgnOV14aPP6zgoMWBxlZNecPyOs5TvvyAeuUuM
   DdxVi+EP23jiIR1IO6ShTB9d21eHOS21JBekEReceived: by 10.68.219.130 with SMTP id po2mr35301315pbc.140.1330356182565;
   Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.253.130] ([115.199.241.178])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
   li19sm12955087pbb.17.2012.02.27.07.22.58
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:00 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:22:53 +0800
Message-Id: <3C19759E-75CC-4DE8-B5D7-465DB4E00383@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, 
   but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
   0.0 DECEASED_NO_ML         Dead not via mailing list
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, 
   but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hello,
   I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, 
   but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.5
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:23:36 -0000
Hello,

I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5

Changes in this release:

* Enhancement: SOCKET-CONNECT argument :nodelay can now set to :if-supported (patch from Anton Vodonosov).
* Enhancement: [server] adding *remote-host* *remote-port* to socket-server stream handler functions (suggested by Matthew Curry)
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed UDP support for LispWorks 6.1 (patch from Camille Troillard by Martin Simmons).
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] Stop using hcl:add-special-free-action for reclaiming unused UDP socket fds to improve multi-threading stablity (suggested by Camille Troillard).
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed SOCKET-CONNECT on Windows, now LOCAL-PORT never have *auto-port* (0) as default value.

Special thanks to LispWorks official,

   Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com>

whom provided the patch for LispWorks 6.1 compatibility. (And with LispWorks 6.1 released with IPv6 support, now I'm seriously considering USOCKET should also start to support IPv6 in next major release)

If you want to download this release, please check

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/

or just wait for next Quicklisp releases.

The API documentation page was slightly updated for the new (:NODELAY :IF-SUPPORTED) support in SOCKET-CONNECT:

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml

As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.

(Due to my recent heavy and hard work on my local Lisp job -- porting a very big commercial Lisp application from single-threaded to multi-threaded model, I'm very sorry that I don't know enough time to release USOCKET 0.6.0 before the end of February, so I decide to release 0.5.5, the last 0.5.x series release. Once I've got my job stabilized again on mid next month, I'll start pushing more work on USOCKET, I promise)

Best Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)
Gensym Release Owner

_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue May 22 13:42:22 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SWvuO-0002ap-Nk
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:42:22 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SWvtl-0002YY-Gu; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:45 -0700
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1SWvtb-0002Y7-SJ
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:37 -0700
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.196])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B59F38EFD
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139
Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139])
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382E17208C
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
   by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id wtXkzuQyGyiu for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.194.92
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-92-194-108-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.108.194.92]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B8BA172092
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:46 +0200
Message-Id: <D32CD4D1-9811-40CB-BA88-4F4F26D31F57@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has
   been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document
   10. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on July 3, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has
   been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document
   10. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on July 3, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has
   been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document
   10. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on July 3, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:42:23 -0000
The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Jun 03 06:51:31 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SbBDP-0001nJ-47
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:51:31 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SbBCt-0001mn-Gy; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:59 -0700
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1SbBCU-0001ln-F6
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:57 -0700
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.196])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C2A87164
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Jun 2012 15:34:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138
Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138])
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01617207E
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Jun 2012 15:34:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
   by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id XuxD0lZnSFae for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.187.187
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-187-187-108-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.108.187.187]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 889CD172077
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200
Message-Id: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been
   accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012,
   unless withdrawn
   by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been
   accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012,
   unless withdrawn
   by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been
   accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in
   its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012,
   unless withdrawn
   by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for
   the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:51:31 -0000
The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Jun 10 06:32:05 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SdiFQ-0003VD-Jj
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:32:04 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SdiFB-0003UZ-4Y; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:49 -0700
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>)
   id 1SdiF6-0003U5-KO; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:45 -0700
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.195])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33B4037A;
   Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138
Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138])
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EEBA8093;
   Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195])
   by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id g3oR0O7zyrzU; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.247.67
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-67-247-108-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.108.247.67]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3AB9A8079;
   Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
In-Reply-To: <21391.1339130972@gemini.franz.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200
Message-Id: <7F5DDE5C-948F-4605-8638-59C2F13451F7@p-cos.net>
References: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1@p-cos.net>
   <21391.1339130972@gemini.franz.com>
To: smh@franz.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Steve,
   Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The
   rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the
   opening
   page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that
   page. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2)
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1)
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Steve,
   Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The
   rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the
   opening
   page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that
   page. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2)
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1)
Cc: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net, CDR Discussions <cdr-discuss@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi Steve,
   Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The
   rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the
   opening
   page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that
   page. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2)
   0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1         BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1)
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:32:05 -0000
Hi Steve,

Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR.

The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page.

But let me stress a few points directly related to your questions:

- It is certainly possible to discuss a CDR after it has been finalized.

- More specifically, it's also certainly possible to refine a CDR after it has been finalized. However, the particular CDR (with a specific CDR number) cannot be changed anymore. If you want to refine a finalized CDR, you have to submit a new one, which will then receive a new CDR number. New CDRs can claim to updates to existing CDRs. (For example, it is already the case that CDR 4 is a refinement of CDR 0, and the whole CDR process is currently based on CDR 4 rather than CDR 0.)

- Whether a particular CDR is eventually accepted by the community or not is in the hands of the community, not in the hands of the CDR editors. CDR is only a repository for documents, not a body that can enforce or endorse standards. This was an intentional design decision, to avoid the need for CDR editors to judge the contents of CDR documents (which they don't), and to avoid legal implications.

- There are three mailing lists associated with CDR: cdr-announce is for announcements, cdr-devel is for discussions about the CDR repository and process itself, and cdr-discuss is for discussions about specific CDRs. If you would like to continue a discussion about CDR itself, please do so on cdr-devel. Didier (the author of CDR 11) seems to be willing to discuss CDR 11 on cdr-discuss, so if you are interested in that, please discuss it there. (Authors are encouraged, but not required to discuss documents. Again, CDR is intentionally a light-weight process: Any requirements imposed on authors would need to be checked, and CDR is designed to require as few checks as possible. That's why documents don't even need to be discussed, because it would be hard to judge what would qualify as a "sufficient" amount of discussion. We believe that members of the community are mature enough to decide for themselves what constitutes a "good" CDR or not.)

Again, thanks a lot for your interest. I hope this clarifies your questions. Please feel free to comment or discuss this further, if you think there is room for improvement.

Best,
Pascal

P.S.: I personally believe that Duane Rettig's proposal for environment access would be an excellent candidate for a CDR. Franz Inc. probably has more extensions that would be good contributions. Please let us know if we can help with submitting CDR documents, in case you are interested.

On 8 Jun 2012, at 06:49, Steve Haflich wrote:
...
Pascal et al.
I'm confused, or perhaps only ignorant, about the process underlying the
CDR repository.  Once a CDR becomes final after a very short time, there
seems to be no forum or machinery to discuss or refine it.  While I find
myself sympathetic to at least some of the stated problems, none of the
stated solutions are fully acceptable -- there are glitches in the
specifications, or important situations missed, or incompatibilities
between proposed changes and the official sanctity of the CL package.
Is there some forum for further discussion of "final" CDRs?  Otherwise
the CDRs seem a rather profitless exercise.
_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce
--
Pascal Costanza
The views expressed in this email are my own, and not those of my employer.

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Jul 08 07:51:21 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SnspV-0004Pu-FN
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:21 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SnspF-0004PL-OZ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:05 -0700
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1SnspD-0004PE-SJ
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:04 -0700
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.196])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1DF3B16A
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139
Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139])
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C30E172099
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
   by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id MgQm3oLVX+c8 for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.210.186
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-186-210-108-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.108.210.186]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3454172074
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200
Message-Id: <9046BB4E-4AEB-4731-86AA-344CFD3BC75A@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its
   final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its
   final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and
   ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its
   final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:51:21 -0000
The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Jul 15 10:20:02 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SqSUD-000268-SC
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:20:02 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1SqSTy-00024z-P9; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:47 -0700
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1SqSTt-00024h-Pj
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:45 -0700
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.195])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492DA3FFA8
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.141
Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141])
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1776A80C2
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195])
   by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id bLqh5GnJG5Nq for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.129.95
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-95-129-108-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.108.129.95]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A33EA80BB
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:46 +0200
Message-Id: <A218D51A-5457-48F6-9062-E308B0A78C04@p-cos.net>
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this
   document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this
   document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior
   in
   terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this
   document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:20:02 -0000
The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Fri Sep 21 15:20:15 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TFBa3-0003h2-2X
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:15 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TFBZz-0003gl-37; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:11 -0700
Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126]
   helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBZw-0003gS-UB
   for clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:09 -0700
Received: from minideb ([92.155.70.94]) by mwinf5d07 with ME
   id 1xpr1k004222d6c03xpr1r; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:52 +0200
From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>
To: clfswm-devel@common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
Organization: None
Mail-Copies-To: never
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200
Message-ID: <878vc359mq.fsf@common-lisp.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all, As said in the previous weeks,
   there is a new CLFSWM
   release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106,
   changes are
   as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all, As said in the previous weeks,
   there is a new CLFSWM
   release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106,
   changes are
   as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all, As said in the previous weeks,
   there is a new CLFSWM
   release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106,
   changes are
   as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1209 is out
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:20:15 -0000
Hi all,

As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged
R-1209.
Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow:

  - Transparency support with xcompmgr

  - Multi heads support out of the box (no more need for individual
    hack). There is some new key bindings to circulate through root (ie:
    screen). 

  - New Expos� Mode which support infinite children (previously 26) and
    multiple roots.

  - Better X Errors handling.

Also, there is some new modules in the contrib directory:

  - contrib/toolbar.lisp to display toolbars everywhere. They can be
    clickable, hidden on click or with pointer motion.

  - contrib/wallpaper.lisp to display different wallpaper on different
    screen. 

More information can be found at http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/

As always, thanks a lot for any patch, feedback or request!

Best regards and have fun,

Philippe

_______________________________________________
clfswm-announce mailing list
clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Nov 20 12:24:10 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TauMb-0005uN-V5
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:24:10 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TauML-0005rn-Qb; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:53 -0800
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1TauMK-0005rS-4n
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:52 -0800
X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted
X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.196])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D73897C
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:50 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.131
Received: from mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.131])
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834DB17209C
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter11-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
   by mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id LlweFnuq08C2 for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 94.108.66.118
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-118-66-108-94.static.as47377.net
   [94.108.66.118]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A908172096
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Message-Id: <8727B47E-EBF1-46DB-9BAA-1E3284EB2D85@p-cos.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100
To: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" has
   been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document
   12. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on January 1, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" has
   been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document
   12. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on January 1, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" has
   been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document
   12. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and
   will be finalized on January 1, 2012,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand.
   See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this
   document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:24:10 -0000
The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sat Dec 08 00:56:11 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1ThGCh-0004Yp-DZ
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:11 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1ThGCc-0004YT-9F; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:06 -0800
Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126]
   helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCa-0004YI-7K
   for clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:05 -0800
Received: from minideb ([83.204.98.245]) by mwinf5d60 with ME
   id YwRk1k0085HfhKF03wRkhG; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:45 +0100
From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard@common-lisp.net>
To: clfswm-devel@common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
Organization: None
Mail-Copies-To: never
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87sj7huf07.fsf@common-lisp.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all,
   I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version.
   There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs
   has been fixed. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all,
   I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version.
   There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs
   has been fixed. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Hi all,
   I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version.
   There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs
   has been fixed. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1212 released
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:56:11 -0000
Hi all,

I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version.

There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs
has been fixed.

Here is a small resume of the git log information:

  * load.lisp do no run CLFSWM by default. It build an executable lisp
    image and can download CLX and ASDF if needed (this will help (I
    hope) lisp newbies).

  * The ./configure as been replaced by a simple Makefile which ease the
    load of load.lisp (it search for available lisp implementations).

  * New .desktop files to ease the login manager integration.

  * Some bug fixes on multi heads monitors to add or remove monitors on
    the fly. Non xinerama configuration are correctly handled.

  * Add support for numeric keypad with numlock on.

  * Key bindings for main and second mode are shown in menu entry.

  * I've added an blank-window-mode in contrib/. This way, we can hide
    part of the screen with blank window. I'm pretty sure nobody except
    me will use it but it's very useful in school class to hide some
    part of the screen on interactive presentation with a video
    projector.

I think this version is pretty clean. So I'll made more announcement
about it ((fr.)comp.land.lisp and french slashdot equivalent). I don't
know where I can make english announcement/presentation (slashdot
doesn't seem the place). So if you like it, feel free to share your
feeling about CLFSWM. This way, maybe it will show up again on Wikipedia :-) 

As always any feedback is very welcome.

Have fun,

Philippe

_______________________________________________
clfswm-announce mailing list
clfswm-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 07:59:45 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TntOS-0001Uv-NN
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:44 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1TntOM-0001Ua-1O; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:38 -0800
Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1TntOG-0001Tz-LQ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:36 -0800
Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so3945236dak.0
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113; 
   h=x-received:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to
   :mime-version:x-mailer;
   bh=HctMN/o85y2WcGNMxTdG5/pIg9bAjHZu5WrVciaF/wE=;
   b=L69i/VH7Bn2x5tRrP6jUDEUAAvMHdmstpQDX+dm+zP/amJuL/IgHw43nmNstYmTmdk
   Mxc3QPCIKmPkONApRtzRQdLgM2AwlTBGDlBowGHG0/epsKizFAQccERG0Unw21ot6nnT
   i75Eqp9sbp1C4hQZYF09/0s9m/DNIVliJACGOlU15LugbZ1gQSjqagyfhQ2zrmjruQLe
   fC73Vtm8zgQC55oQ1V0ALmz4+8kBimjFPzJK4jQHfAwQPvXSEN87rKCdTnD8y+bVR4Fe
   OrogVJfJyFnJ5dZ9UDfemd35o/vpyZ9eRqM6Nrz8NsNu/7wLlpF3D6UW2M279xSlo0zy
   21gA=
X-Received: by 10.68.235.40 with SMTP id uj8mr85573285pbc.98.1356537566534;
   Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.253.103] ([125.120.14.193])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm16706582paz.36.2012.12.26.07.59.22
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:25 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:59:17 +0800
Message-Id: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Dear Lispers,
   We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.
   Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======98727182="
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Dear Lispers,
   We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.
   Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview:  Dear Lispers,
   We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.
   Changes in this release: [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
   (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
   -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
   0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
   0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:59:45 -0000
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 19:22:49 2012
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1To43V-0003Lr-0f
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:49 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1To43I-0003LQ-Ox; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:40 -0800
Received: from mail-da0-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>)
   id 1To43D-0003L8-Uh; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:35 -0800
Received: by mail-da0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h15so4129591dan.23
   for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113; 
   h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
   :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
   bh=+Gs0pHm70t8G1pcjQMHicEtLlndJjawPpdDI/L777mk=;
   b=sYxHG5HtNkGk56ExQ83iv0Gxq4TrroVGnXXriWlYJAIajG/W9OQ6gmLaF6sxx+ox9h
   adMcqAJOtr59Ho80o11OIeSkK8ef0EkZN18t3tRznqKqAHWDQUjZ6fBK1HEd4Qacr624
   zb9NT+AV+aK0xWmGh/UOZxa+fhhTLQh0P+FziRVGB8dWeELjJBbSeq7xDSYsj2JHgxeq
   Gx1LF3dAe1otneNDSv4lELdc6ShmTEgmIk/tWfZwmn5ZxwTR9IzGvHXWYRmS5p9NU8kw
   YkrzeSyX+Kj42WdkIWHTzIIrxt4+EXhZTIoHyN8dRwvSj63hn/12LyvlOUYfiVQXEVC7
   0ODQ=
X-Received: by 10.68.223.135 with SMTP id qu7mr12148744pbc.134.1356578545732; 
   Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.82] ([220.191.186.26])
   by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id is3sm16958083pbc.6.2012.12.26.19.22.24
   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
   Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:22:21 +0800
Message-Id: <A7913E4C-98AE-48C7-88E3-F325AEE58A35@gmail.com>
References: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F@gmail.com>
To: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
--=======98727182=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-273235943

--Apple-Mail-1-273235943
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Dear Lispers,

We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.

Changes in this release:

* New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options.
* New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer.
* New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now)
* Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo)
* Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants.
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov)
* Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments.

For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options:

* RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO)
* REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server
* BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client

For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later.

(Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon)

As usual, if you want to download this release, please check

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/

or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates.

The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...):

	http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml

As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.

P. S. Something currently still in progress:

* New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide
* New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport.
* New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets.

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)
USOCKET Team

--Apple-Mail-1-273235943
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=us-ascii

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear Lispers,<div><br></div><div>We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.</div><div><br></div><div>Changes in this release:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options.</div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer.</div><div>* New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants.</div><div>* Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov)</div><div>* Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments.</div></div><div><br></div><div>For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options:</div><div><br></div><div>* RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO)</div><div>* REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server</div><div>* BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client</div><div><br></div><div>For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later.</div><div><br></div><div>(Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon)</div><div><br></div><div>As usual, if you want to download this release, please check<br><br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; ">	</span><a href="http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/">http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/</a><br><br>or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates.<br><br>The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...):<br><br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; ">	</span><a href="http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml">http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml</a><br><br>As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>P. S. Something currently still in progress:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide</div><div>* New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport.</div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Chun Tian (binghe)</div><div>USOCKET Team</div><div><br></div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail-1-273235943--

--=======98727182=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

--=======98727182=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
--=======98727182=--

 the administrator of that system for details.

 Content preview:  Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast,
    I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's
    0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] 

 Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-BeenThere: usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.

 Content preview:  Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast,
    I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's
    0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] 

 Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel@common-lisp.net>
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.

 Content preview:  Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast,
    I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's
    0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] 

 Content analysis details:   (-100.7 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
	<mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
	<mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 03:22:49 -0000

Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time.

Il giorno 26/dic/2012, alle ore 23:59, Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp@gmail.com> ha scritto:
...
Dear Lispers,
We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.
Changes in this release:
* New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options.
* New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer.
* New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now)
* Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo)
* Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants.
* Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov)
* Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments.
For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options:
* RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO)
* REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server
* BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client
For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later.
(Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon)
As usual, if you want to download this release, please check
http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/
or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates.
The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...):
http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml
As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.
P. S. Something currently still in progress:
* New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide
* New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport.
* New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets.
Regards,
Chun Tian (binghe)
USOCKET Team
_______________________________________________
usocket-announce mailing list
usocket-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Tue Jan 01 11:52:22 2013
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Tq7ss-0002ZR-N3
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:22 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1Tq7sj-0002Yx-46; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:13 -0800
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1Tq7sd-0002Yh-EM
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:11 -0800
X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted
X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.196])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6939C6E
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue,  1 Jan 2013 20:52:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.134
Received: from mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.134])
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2E5172067
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue,  1 Jan 2013 20:52:05 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter4-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196])
   by mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id aVWO8pnuy04E for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue,  1 Jan 2013 20:51:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 94.109.37.119
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-119-37-109-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.109.37.119]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8AB8172080
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Tue,  1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Message-Id: <C6054511-EB2E-4F3F-979E-56FA8F44874A@p-cos.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100
To: "cdr-announce@common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process,
   we now only list the
   title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the
   records. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process,
   we now only list the
   title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the
   records. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common
   Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process,
   we now only list the
   title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the
   records. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 withdrawn
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:52:23 -0000
The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Feb 17 07:28:17 2013
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1U76A5-0000dr-Cw
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:17 -0800
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1U769u-0000d0-5f; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:06 -0800
Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1U769r-0000cn-MC
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:04 -0800
X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted
X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.195])
   by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4182442EB6
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.145])
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C6A80C0
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter17-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195])
   by mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id FrfxM1l7fZTW for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 94.109.39.50
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-50-39-109-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.109.39.50]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8B20A80B4
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Message-Id: <5467782F-5A53-4858-8720-0A2CFE26B741@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100
To: "cdr-announce@common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been submitted
   by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According
   to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on March 31, 2013,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been submitted
   by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According
   to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on March 31, 2013,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been submitted
   by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According
   to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized
   on March 31, 2013,
   unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See
   http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/
   for the details of this document. [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-102.3 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
   medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org]
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 accepted
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:28:17 -0000
The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document.

--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
...
From announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net Sun Mar 31 10:04:25 2013
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1UMLg9-0004V2-EF
   for cl-debian@common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:25 -0700
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net)
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces@common-lisp.net>)
   id 1UMLfw-0004UG-OV; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:12 -0700
Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86])
   by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
   (envelope-from <pc@p-cos.net>) id 1UMLfr-0004Tu-AR
   for cdr-announce@common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:11 -0700
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net
   [217.70.183.197])
   by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1771F47B41C
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141])
   by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360B941C06B
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197])
   by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180])
   (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id 2Ya+c89bOltn for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.109.19.151
Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-151-19-109-94.dyn.as47377.net
   [94.109.19.151]) (Authenticated sender: pascal@p-cos.net)
   by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A20FB41C060
   for <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>;
   Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net>
Message-Id: <5229F700-C4E1-4AEC-8777-F596174AE77F@p-cos.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200
To: "cdr-announce@common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce@common-lisp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and
   cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for
   the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and
   cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for
   the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
X-BeenThere: announcements@common-lisp.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: announcements-bounces@common-lisp.net
X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
   running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has
   identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
   label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
   the administrator of that system for details.
   Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has
   been finalized. According to the CDR process,
   this document is now in its final stage and
   cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for
   the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] 
   Content analysis details:   (-100.0 points, 5.0 required)
   pts rule name              description
   ---- ----------------------
   --------------------------------------------------
   -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 finalized
X-BeenThere: cl-debian@common-lisp.net
List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian>
List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>,
   <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:04:26 -0000
The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document.
--
Pascal Costanza

_______________________________________________
cdr-announce mailing list
cdr-announce@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce

_______________________________________________
announcements site list
announcements@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements

[cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch

Daniel Schepler

owner＠bugs.debian.org

tags

participants (2)