[cl-debian] Bug#343695: gcl: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation
Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-12 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Here is an update of the debconf template for gcl. Regards, Daniel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Daniel Nylander wrote:
Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-12 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n
Here is an update of the debconf template for gcl.
Regards, Daniel
I just happened to see this. It's a truly horrible translation with /negative/ added value. It seems to be written with no understanding at all about CL in general or GCL in particular, nor the terms used. It's also ungrammatical and un-idiomatic Swedish all over. ',mr -- [Emacs] is written in Lisp, which is the only computer language that is beautiful. -- Neal Stephenson, _In the Beginning was the Command Line_
Martin Rydstr|m skrev:
I just happened to see this. It's a truly horrible translation with /negative/ added value. It seems to be written with no understanding at all about CL in general or GCL in particular, nor the terms used.
It's also ungrammatical and un-idiomatic Swedish all over.
So you might be able to correct the errors and release an update? Daniel
Martin Rydstr|m skrev:
I just happened to see this. It's a truly horrible translation with /negative/ added value. It seems to be written with no understanding at all about CL in general or GCL in particular, nor the terms used.
It's also ungrammatical and un-idiomatic Swedish all over.
So you might be able to correct the errors and release an update?
Rydis might not, but here's a version that (while not good, per se) at least is valid Swedish, somewhat closer to terminology used in Common Lisp circles and meets the minimum standard of not making me cringe. Be aware that I don't normally poke "PO files", so it might well be some format problems. //Ingvar
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:47:43 -0700 with message-id <E1Fv1jz-0006FY-0U@spohr.debian.org> and subject line Bug#343695: fixed in gcl 2.6.7-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
participants (4)
-
Daniel Nylander -
Ingvar -
Martin Rydstr|m -
owner＠bugs.debian.org