[cl-debian] Bug#470381: cl-asdf: installation fails

Package: cl-asdf Version: 1.111-1 Severity: serious Hi, In a clean unstable i386 chroot: Setting up cl-asdf (1.111-1) ... Reinstalling for sbcl Recompiling Common Lisp Controller for sbcl /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh loading and dumping clc. ; in: LAMBDA NIL ; (SB-KERNEL:FLOAT-WAIT) ; ; note: deleting unreachable code ; ; compilation unit finished ; printed 1 note ; in: LAMBDA NIL ; (SB-KERNEL:FLOAT-WAIT) ; ; note: deleting unreachable code ; ; compilation unit finished ; printed 1 note STYLE-WARNING: redefining INIT-COMMON-LISP-CONTROLLER-V5 in DEFUN STYLE-WARNING: redefining COMPILE-COMMON-LISP-CONTROLLER-V5 in DEFUN STYLE-WARNING: redefining INIT-COMMON-LISP-CONTROLLER-V4 in DEFUN STYLE-WARNING: redefining INIT-COMMON-LISP-CONTROLLER in DEFUN ; loading system definition from /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-grovel/sb-grovel.asd into ; #<PACKAGE "ASDF1"> ; registering #<SYSTEM SB-GROVEL {A815F61}> as SB-GROVEL fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 4197(tid 3085297328): GC invariant lost, file "gencgc.c", line 4641 Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment. ldb> -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Hi Lucas! On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:18:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
In a clean unstable i386 chroot:
Setting up cl-asdf (1.111-1) ... Reinstalling for sbcl Recompiling Common Lisp Controller for sbcl /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh loading and dumping clc. [...] ; loading system definition from /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-grovel/sb-grovel.asd into ; #<PACKAGE "ASDF1"> ; registering #<SYSTEM SB-GROVEL {A815F61}> as SB-GROVEL fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 4197(tid 3085297328): GC invariant lost, file "gencgc.c", line 4641
Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment. ldb>
I cannot reproduce it on two clean unstable i386 chroots, both generated by cowbuilder, the first on my sid amd64 and the second on an etch i386. FWIW, I also tried SBCL_1:1.0.14.0-1, which should be the SBCL version present in sid on March 10th, so when the bug occurred: again, the bug is not reproducible. Lucas, since you're the only one who experienced this bug, it's OK for you if I set 'Severity: important' (IMHO this isn't RC) and 'Tags: unreproducible'? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
participants (2)
-
Luca Capello
-
Lucas Nussbaum