[cl-debian] New package versions as of 20060930
Hello Peter! Could you please upload the following new package versions? They are intended to be part of etch. - version 1:20060918-2: arnesi fiveam parenscript qbook yaclml - version 1:20060930-1: stumpwm - version 1:20060513-3: s-xml - version 1.1-5: rfc2388 - version 0.3-4: trivial-sockets Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Hello! On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:31:47 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Could you please upload the following new package versions? They are intended to be part of etch. [...] - version 1:20060930-1: stumpwm
Actually, it's version 1:20060930-2, I forgot to `darcs remove` and to update debian/patches/00list. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Hi Luca, On Sunday 01 October 2006 03:54, Luca Capello wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:31:47 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Could you please upload the following new package versions? They are intended to be part of etch. [...] - version 1:20060930-1: stumpwm
Actually, it's version 1:20060930-2, I forgot to `darcs remove` and to update debian/patches/00list.
Some of the packages are non -1 versions but have no z files in the archive. I've used -si to force source inclusion, is this ok? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|
Hi Peter! On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:37:09 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 01 October 2006 03:54, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:31:47 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Could you please upload the following new package versions? They are intended to be part of etch. [...] - version 1:20060930-1: stumpwm
Actually, it's version 1:20060930-2, I forgot to `darcs remove` and to update debian/patches/00list.
Some of the packages are non -1 versions but have no z files in the archive. I've used -si to force source inclusion, is this ok?
Ops, sorry, I forgot that versions -1 are on [1], because I prepare them for my NM process. Peter, if you haven't uploaded them yet, I can provide the orig.tar.gz of all of my packages. Just wait tomorrow evening :-D Moreover, I'd like to fix bug #390629 [2], which I'll do tonight or tomorrow at maximum. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://dak.ganneff.de [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390629
Hi Peter! On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:39:51 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:37:09 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
Some of the packages are non -1 versions but have no z files in the archive. I've used -si to force source inclusion, is this ok?
Ops, sorry, I forgot that versions -1 are on [1], because I prepare them for my NM process.
Peter, if you haven't uploaded them yet, I can provide the orig.tar.gz of all of my packages. Just wait tomorrow evening :-D
Here I am! The packages you should upload: - version 1:20061003-1: arnesi fiveam parenscript qbook yaclml - version 1.1-5: rfc2388 (.orig.tar.gz on the archive [1]) - version 1:20060930-2: stumpwm (-1 was never released before, so it's OK to use -si) - version 1:20060513-3: s-xml (.orig.tar.gz on the archive [2]) - version 0.3-4: trivial-sockets (.orig.tar.gz on the archive [3]) About rfc2109 [4], I'm discussing with the upstream author about a patch which lets any user to easily strip the RFC parts from the source code. So, my personal opinion is to wait until this caveat will be resolved, thus keeping rfc2109 outside etch. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/r/rfc2388/rfc2388_1.1.orig.tar.gz [2] http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/s/s-xml/s-xml_20060513.orig.tar.gz [3] http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/t/trivial-sockets/trivial-sockets_0.3.orig.t... [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359348
participants (2)
-
Luca Capello -
Peter Van Eynde