Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802@debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 18:47:46 +0000

From bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk Sun Sep 21 13:47:36 2003 Return-path: <bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk> Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A19FA-0004zX-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:47:36 -0500 Received: from cenderis.demon.co.uk ([62.49.17.254] helo=localhost) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A19F9-0004nF-0W for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:35 +0100 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E05A17C719; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:34 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bruce Stephens <bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: clue fails to build on installation with cmucl X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20030921184734.E05A17C719@localhost> Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: clue Version: 20011231 Severity: normal I just installed cmucl and cmucl-source, and it appeared that cmucl-clx built correctly (I got no errors from that, anyway). And yet when I install clue, I get three emails from clc-build-daemon saying that clue, clio-examples and pictures failed to build: Hello This is the clc-build-daemon reporting a build failure. While recompiling package clue for compiler cmucl I got the error code 1 If you want to retry the compilation and possibly report this as a bug then please read /usr/share/doc/common-lisp-controller/REPORTING-BUGS The command to retry the recompilation is: clc-send-command --verbose remove clue cmucl ; echo returns: $? clc-send-command --verbose recompile clue cmucl ; echo returns: $? After this message I will append the last few lines of output. Thanks for your attention /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/cmucl.sh rebuilding... rebuilding clue ; Loading #p"/usr/share/common-lisp/systems/clue.system". ; Compilation unit aborted. ; Compilation unit aborted. Built Error: File-error in function COMMON-LISP::INTERNAL-LOAD: "modules:cmucl-clx-library" does not exist. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cenderis.demon.co.uk 2.4.22ms1 #1 Sat Aug 30 22:00:43 BST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages clue depends on: ii cmucl-source 18e-7 The CMUCL lisp sources ii common-lisp-controller 3.76 This is a Common Lisp source and c -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 212018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000

From pvaneynd@debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd@debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802@debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done@bugs.debian.org, 212018-done@bugs.debian.org, 278137-done@bugs.debian.org, 282716-done@bugs.debian.org, 319427-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 212018-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|