[cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20060925-1 (source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:50:00 +0200 Source: slime Binary: cl-swank slime Architecture: source all Version: 1:20060925-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Changes: slime (1:20060925-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version, with support for sbcl 0.9.17.0 Files: 76237bc0f316e696371a8c4fd7571ab3 630 non-free/devel optional slime_20060925-1.dsc 9e5740f704470e478e6824c657fafa51 458894 non-free/devel optional slime_20060925.orig.tar.gz 1ce928cd3994adf6296e2a116c288cff 10245 non-free/devel optional slime_20060925-1.diff.gz c6c23872e409f86a6e3fff145f870658 591226 non-free/devel optional slime_20060925-1_all.deb be2561aab55bb998e25102afcf717a89 306502 non-free/devel optional cl-swank_20060925-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFGhGS11ldN0tyliURAkP7AKCc+glnxuM3MTo8LVA6jheTyMIbAwCguAHb Tr71fTQubT1k0slc1w8cN74= =tTv9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-swank_20060925-1_all.deb to pool/non-free/s/slime/cl-swank_20060925-1_all.deb slime_20060925-1.diff.gz to pool/non-free/s/slime/slime_20060925-1.diff.gz slime_20060925-1.dsc to pool/non-free/s/slime/slime_20060925-1.dsc slime_20060925-1_all.deb to pool/non-free/s/slime/slime_20060925-1_all.deb slime_20060925.orig.tar.gz to pool/non-free/s/slime/slime_20060925.orig.tar.gz
Scribit Peter Van Eynde dies 28/09/2006 hora 08:02:
slime (1:20060925-1) unstable; urgency=low
SLIME is still in non-free, what is the status of the licensing? Is there work going on to clean it and make it DFSG compliant? Would help be needed for this to make progress? Curiously, Nowhere man -- nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
On Friday 29 September 2006 03:56, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Scribit Peter Van Eynde dies 28/09/2006 hora 08:02:
slime (1:20060925-1) unstable; urgency=low
SLIME is still in non-free, what is the status of the licensing? Is there work going on to clean it and make it DFSG compliant?
There are still a few files non-free. As listed in debian/copyright we have: | WITHOUT a license: | swank-ecl.lisp | ChangeLog (as this is a generated file it can be considered | derivative of the others I assume) | | doc/Makefile | HACKING | NEWS | PROBLEMS | README
Would help be needed for this to make progress?
As I already contacted the slime people about this on numerous occasions I suppose they do not consider this to be a problem. Maybe another (moderate, polite) voice would consider them to be in error. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|
Hello! On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:03:08 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Friday 29 September 2006 03:56, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Scribit Peter Van Eynde dies 28/09/2006 hora 08:02:
slime (1:20060925-1) unstable; urgency=low
SLIME is still in non-free, what is the status of the licensing? Is there work going on to clean it and make it DFSG compliant?
There are still a few files non-free. As listed in debian/copyright we have: [...] As I already contacted the slime people about this on numerous occasions I suppose they do not consider this to be a problem. Maybe another (moderate, polite) voice would consider them to be in error.
Thanks to Marco Baringer's work at [1] (and the thread at [2]), I think that slime could move to main! Thank you again, Marco! Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2006-October/005267.html [2] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2006-October/005263.html
participants (3)
-
Luca Capello -
Peter Van Eynde -
Pierre THIERRY