[cl-debian] UCW status?
Hello: I am plaining to use UCW, and i saw some wnpp bugs from Luca related to this, so i dare to asking for UCW overall status??. Thanks in advance. P.D. I'm still a lispnewbie so i don't dare to offer my help but if you think i can help somehow pls tell me. -- Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon -- erick@fsl.org.mx PGP Key 1024D/9741C03A 2004-11-19 Key fingerprint = 1764 3C6F B433 B2DD 9029 98B1 8E6B 58D3 9741 C03A "Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best way to predict the future is to invent it." "No te preocupes acerca de lo que alguien mas vaya a hacer. La mejor manera de predecir el futuro es inventarlo." - Alan Kay
Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon <erick@fsl.org.mx> writes:
Hello:
I am plaining to use UCW, and i saw some wnpp bugs from Luca related to this, so i dare to asking for UCW overall status??.
what's wnpp? i use ucw daily for multiple real-world production applications. this has two consequences: 1) ucw is (and will remain for quite a while) activly used/maintained 2) my time is occasionaly limited to fixing those bugs that I need, other bugs may take longer for me to get around to (though i've been pretty good so far about applying patches sent ot the list). hth. -- -Marco Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget the perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. -Leonard Cohen
"Marco Baringer" <mb@bese.it> writes:
Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon <erick@fsl.org.mx> writes:
Hello:
I am plaining to use UCW, and i saw some wnpp bugs from Luca related to this, so i dare to asking for UCW overall status??.
i forget i was subscribed to cl-debian and misinterpreted this question, sorry for the noise. -- -Marco Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget the perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. -Leonard Cohen
Hello! I'm sorry for the delay in my answer... On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:59:34 +0100, Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon wrote:
I am plaining to use UCW, and i saw some wnpp bugs from Luca related to this, so i dare to asking for UCW overall status??.
Basically, university/lab work are preventing me to finish the UCW debianization, and with that I mean also all the needed dependencies. For the record, as Marco stated here [1], UCW depends on the following packages, marked with a double quote (") if already present in Debian or with a quote (') if in the CL-Debian repository only. - " asdf - " iterate - " cl-ppcre - " slime [AFAIK the correct dependency should be to cl-swank] - ' arnesi_dev - ' yaclml - parenscript I started to debianize parenscript, but I was stucked in the documentation, because I'd like to convert it to qbook (like the other packages Marco develops). OTOH, I should update arnesi_dev (which I call simply "arnesi", because I don't provide the stable version) and yaclml need to be updated to a more recent checkout. Then, different packages are needed accordingly to the backends you prefer. I think that in this case we should use the Recommends: field instead of strict dependencies, because we cannot check for all the possible combinations. - " rfc2388 [but as now, a modified source is needed [2] ] - " puri - " mod-lisp - " araneida - " portable aserve And what about the different Lisp implementations [3]? - " clisp - " openmcl - " cmucl - " sbcl - " allegro - lispworks This is the situation: most of the packages are already debianized, I (or someone other that want to finish) need to put the last efforts in it. Moreover, I'd like to have a test-script to be sure that a fresh install of UCW (something like `apt-get install ucw-test`, with ucw-test depending on ucw) brings up a basic working system. This test-script could be then used by others on different archs, as ATM I own only an i386 :-( BTW, IIRC quite all the dependencies are ASDF-installable [4]. HTH! Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2005-October/001181.html [2] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2005-December/001373.html [3] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2005-October/001184.html [4] http://www.cliki.net/asdf-install
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:39, Luca Capello wrote:
Basically, university/lab work are preventing me to finish the UCW debianization, and with that I mean also all the needed dependencies.
If you make the work done already available we'll try to find some time to finish it for you.
Moreover, I'd like to have a test-script to be sure that a fresh install of UCW (something like `apt-get install ucw-test`, with ucw-test depending on ucw) brings up a basic working system. This test-script could be then used by others on different archs, as ATM I own only an i386 :-(
I agree. Does someone with UCW experience have any ideas? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|
Hello! On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:37:15 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:39, Luca Capello wrote:
Basically, university/lab work are preventing me to finish the UCW debianization, and with that I mean also all the needed dependencies.
If you make the work done already available we'll try to find some time to finish it for you.
I found some time to continue... ;-) BTW, all of my work is usually available on the CL-Debian repository: http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/lcapello/ Now, the situation is the following. I compiled each package via ASDF with CMUCL, SBCL and CLisp (sid versions). - arnesi, ITP #337646 [1], updated as of today darcs - fiveam, ITP #337657 [2], updated as of today darcs, but it doesn't compile because of [3] - qbook, ITP #337666 [4], updated as of today darcs and modified the debian/control file to explain why tetex-bin is suggested - yaclml, ITP #337662 [5], updated as of today darcs - parenscript is quite ready, I need to figure out the best way to install the documents, so probably I'll file an upstream patch [6]. - UCW is on the way :-D Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please?
Moreover, I'd like to have a test-script to be sure that a fresh install of UCW (something like `apt-get install ucw-test`, with ucw-test depending on ucw) brings up a basic working system. This test-script could be then used by others on different archs, as ATM I own only an i386 :-(
I agree. Does someone with UCW experience have any ideas?
FYI, some software developed by Marco has an ASDF system defined as "test", so this is a starting point. What I was referring to as "a basic working system" is an HTTP working system ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337646 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337657 [3] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2006-January/001475.html [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337666 [5] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337662 [6] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2006-January/001469.html
Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:31:52 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
I found some time to continue... ;-) [...] Now, the situation is the following. I compiled each package via ASDF with CMUCL, SBCL and CLisp (sid versions). [...] - fiveam, ITP #337657 [2], updated as of today darcs, but it doesn't compile because of [3]
Marco just corrected the bug, so I updated the CL-Debian package as well. BTW, now fiveam includes make-qbook.lisp to generate the documentation in HTML via qbook. As the documentation is generated in the same folder as make-qbook.lisp (so, ./docs), I didn't include it, leaving this act to the end user. This because the end user should anyway learn how to use qbook for the other BESE software (arnesi, yaclml and UCW come with documentation via qbook). I can include that file, too, if this would be the best thing to do.
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please?
You should check fiveam, too :-D Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Hello, On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please?
You should check fiveam, too :-D
I've checked them out. I only have one (rather stupid) comment: my darcs-build.sh script looks for 'true' version numbers, without epoch's. As this is the 'version' of upstream. You have tagged with an epoch, so I had to retag without one. As they build and installed without problems and even linda and lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|
Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please?
You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=349607
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 14:29:52 +0000
From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 06:29:52 2005 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYP3H-0008Vd-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:29:52 -0800 Received: (qmail 20825 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 15:29:46 +0100 Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100) by acquagioca.it with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 15:29:46 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F3C9CC5C; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:29:13 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ITP: cl-arnesi -- small Common Lisp utilities X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:29:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87zmojjk9q.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : cl-arnesi Version : 1:20051105-1 Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it> * URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/arnesi.html * License : BSD Description : small Common Lisp utilities arnesi is a Common Lisp utility suite. It contains various "bits 'n pieces" of code. . Features: * Flow control macros - while, whichever, if-bind, etc. * A simple logging facility - kind-of/sort-of/maybe like log4j. * HTTP/HTML utilities - URL and HTML escaping * Pattern matching - fare-matcher style pattern matcher and "regular" list matcher * Accumulation - collecting and reducing macros * Cps transformer - an ad-hoc, bug ridden implementation of half of call/cc. * Decimal arithmetic - convert floats to exact rationals and vice versa with a given precision; standard rounding functions. * MOP compatibility package - The MOPP package provides the MOP's symbols on various implementations. Currently OpenMCL, CMUCL, SBCL, Lispworks and CLISP are supported. . The recommended packages add extra features: documentation via cl-qbook, test suite with cl-fiveam and add-ons for cl-ppcre. . This is the development version. ===== This is the first of a series of ITPs for Common Lisp software that is necessary as dependency for UCW [1]. As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package to the CL-Debian repository [2]. The package is linda and lintian free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [3]. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw/ [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi [3] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbLOoVAp7Xm10JmkRArZjAJ9ozHTCBA4dVtA7CBvUoev8VVqhtACfdeJ6 ZRhswz4sIzmDhbCWqx9yCq8= =MT0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337646-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:45 +0000
From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:45 2006 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4DSq-0002lX-Q4 for 337646-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:45 -0800 Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209) by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status? References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please? =20 You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20 lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul 4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w= =Ilot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 16:11:49 +0000
From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 08:11:49 2005 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYQdw-0005w4-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:11:49 -0800 Received: (qmail 24555 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 17:11:45 +0100 Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100) by ilcascinale.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 17:11:45 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F12EBCC5F; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:11:14 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ITP: cl-fiveam -- simple regression testing framework X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87ll03hy73.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : cl-fiveam Version : 1:20051105-1 Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it> * URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/FiveAM.html * License : BSD Description : simple regression testing framework FiveAM is a simple (as far as writing and running tests goes) regression testing framework. It has been designed with Common Lisp's interactive development model in mind. . Features: * Test and test suite hierarchies allow test to be organized into hierarchies to ease running * Functions for re-running recently run tests. * Inter-test dependencies. . The documentation is provided via the cl-qbook package. ===== Continuation of the series of CL software started with bug #337646. As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package to the CL-Debian repository [1]. The package is linda and lintian free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [2]. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbNmiVAp7Xm10JmkRAij/AJ43Jiq8SL/BESDJ4D1A3ytWP8cutwCfXygZ wGi2QwD/Ojb2AU4zBxCkraY= =n1fv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337657-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:42 +0000
From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:42 2006 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4DSo-0002lW-95 for 337657-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209) by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status? References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please? =20 You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20 lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul 4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w= =Ilot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 16:47:39 +0000
From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 08:47:39 2005 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYRCc-0000X3-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:47:38 -0800 Received: (qmail 25817 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 17:47:35 +0100 Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100) by iclivraga.it with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 17:47:34 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CAC67CC5F; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:47:04 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ITP: cl-yaclml -- Yet Another Common Lisp Markup Language X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:47:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87ek5vhwjd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : cl-yaclml Version : 1:20051105-1 Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it> * URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/yaclml.html * License : BSD Description : Yet Another Common Lisp Markup Language YACLML is a collection of macros and utilities for generating XML/HTML like markup from lisp code. . Features: * Constant folds as much as possible. * Macros for generating HTML from within lisp code. * Templating system for generating HTML from designer templates. . The recommended packages add documentation via cl-qbook or a test suite with cl-fiveam. ===== Continuation of the series of CL software started with bug #337646. As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package to the CL-Debian repository [1]. The package is linda and lintian free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [2]. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbOIIVAp7Xm10JmkRAgYIAKCO2b5R3OJ0UND0GCNZbdowmj0cGACeLGXX ho8rD3rTItM00e5AIBVtFL8= =WFWc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337662-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:43 +0000
From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:42 2006 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4DSo-0002lY-8v for 337662-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209) by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status? References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please? =20 You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20 lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul 4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w= =Ilot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:28:23 +0000
From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 09:28:23 2005 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYRq2-0004vj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:28:23 -0800 Received: (qmail 27317 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 18:28:19 +0100 Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100) by sanluigicalcio.it with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 18:28:19 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37207CC5F; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:27:49 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ITP: cl-qbook -- create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:27:46 +0100 Message-ID: <8764r7hunh.fsf@gismo.pca.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : cl-qbook Version : 1:20051105-1 Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it> * URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/qbook.html * License : BSD Description : create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code qbook is a Common Lisp tool to create HTML/LaTeX versions of source code. . Features: * Very simple (easy to learn and use). * It can produce HTML or LaTeX. ===== Continuation of the series of CL software started with bug #337646. As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package to the CL-Debian repository [1]. The package is linda and lintian free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [2]. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbOuVVAp7Xm10JmkRAlMdAJkBC9bJ+q7OmD8rO0gt6YI48RfTHwCggAGq YHSV8QViVkov3gywczo1cSE= =He9P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337666-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:42 +0000
From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:42 2006 Return-path: <luca@pca.it> Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4DSo-0002lZ-5U for 337666-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209) by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100 Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status? References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for inclusion in Debian, please? =20 You should check fiveam, too :-D
[...]
As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20 lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing them. Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is ready :-) 3AThx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul 4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w= =Ilot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Hello again: On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:39 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
Hello!
I'm sorry for the delay in my answer...
It's fine :)
I started to debianize parenscript, but I was stucked in the documentation, because I'd like to convert it to qbook (like the other packages Marco develops). OTOH, I should update arnesi_dev (which I call simply "arnesi", because I don't provide the stable version) and yaclml need to be updated to a more recent checkout.
So you plan to use ucw_dev for the Debian package?
This is the situation: most of the packages are already debianized, I (or someone other that want to finish) need to put the last efforts in it.
I plan to play with the files inthe darcs repository to get the .deb's, maybe i learn some and then could help.
Moreover, I'd like to have a test-script to be sure that a fresh install of UCW (something like `apt-get install ucw-test`, with ucw-test depending on ucw) brings up a basic working system. This test-script could be then used by others on different archs, as ATM I own only an i386 :-(
This sounds good, if you elaborate a bit more i offer to work on this :)
BTW, IIRC quite all the dependencies are ASDF-installable [4].
Yeah i know, so i go to try parenscript whit asdf until exists the deb package. Do you recommend use ASDF whit cliki, url or file?
HTH!
Thank you very much! Greetings. -- Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon -- erick@fsl.org.mx PGP Key 1024D/9741C03A 2004-11-19 Key fingerprint = 1764 3C6F B433 B2DD 9029 98B1 8E6B 58D3 9741 C03A
participants (6)
-
Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon -
Luca Capello -
Marco Baringer -
owner＠bugs.debian.org -
Peter Van Eynde -
Peter Van Eynde