cl-debian

Download

cl-debian@lists.common-lisp.net

2962 discussions

[cl-debian] Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime
by Ross Boylan 27 Mar '09

27 Mar '09

Package: slime Version: 1:20070927-3 Severity: normal During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... emacs-install emacs22 .... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Error while loading 50slime The previous 2 lines recur further down the log. Then comes install/slime: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs22 Loading 00debian-vars... .... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el (source)... ... Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/hyperspec.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/tree-widget.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/bridge.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/inferior-slime.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-asdf.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-autodoc.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-banner.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-c-p-c.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-editing-commands.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fancy.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fancy-inspector.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fuzzy.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-highlight-edits.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-parse.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-presentations.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-presentation-streams.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-references.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-scratch.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-tramp.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-typeout-frame.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-xref-browser.elc .... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads... For emacs21 Setting up emacs21 (21.4a+1-5.1+lenny1) ... emacs-install emacs21 ... Loading 50slime (source)... Error while loading 50slime ... Loading 50slime (source)... Error while loading 50slime .... Loading 50slime (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads (source)... Loading 51debian-el (source)... ... Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/hyperspec.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.elc While compiling slime-repl-abort-read in file /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el: ** `(car (prog1 slime-read-string-threads (setq slime-read-string-threads (cdr slime-read-string-threads))))' called for effect ** `(car (prog1 slime-read-string-tags (setq slime-read-string-tags (cdr slime-read-string-tags))))' called for effect Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/tree-widget.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/bridge.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/inferior-slime.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-asdf.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-autodoc.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-banner.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-c-p-c.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-editing-commands.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fancy.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fancy-inspector.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-fuzzy.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-highlight-edits.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-parse.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-presentations.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-presentation-streams.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-references.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-scratch.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-tramp.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-typeout-frame.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/contrib/slime-xref-browser.elc Done .... Loading 50slime (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads... ... Loading 50slime (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads... I don't know what it all means; slime appears to have been working before this. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages slime depends on: ii cl-swank 1:20070927-3 Superior LISP Interaction Mode for ii emacsen-common 1.4.17 Common facilities for all emacsen Versions of packages slime recommends: ii emacs [info-browser] 22.1+1-2.1+lenny1 The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage) ii emacs21 [info-browser 21.4a+1-5.1+lenny1 The GNU Emacs editor ii emacs22 [info-browser 22.1+1-2.1+lenny1 The GNU Emacs editor ii info [info-browser] 4.11.dfsg.1-2 Standalone GNU Info documentation ii konqueror [info-brows 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-2 KDE's advanced file manager, web b -- no debconf information

3 3

[cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
by Daniel Schepler 26 Mar '09

26 Mar '09

Package: libsigsegv Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. touch aclocal.m4 && \ touch configure # autoconf's stuff for bug #466356 cp configure configure.ORG autoconf aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [config.status] Error 63 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler >From bou Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Lhvmv-00033B-87 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:14 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LhvZu-0005RY-Mf; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:48:46 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LhvZu-0005RJ-9s for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:48:46 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LhvTo-0001zz-2x; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> (slime for {517839}) In-Reply-To: <877i2u1ckp.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> References: <877i2u1ckp.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.12369048535013.transcript(a)bugs.debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > tags 517839 + upstream Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:14 -0000 Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > tags 517839 + upstream Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:03:11 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Lhvnp-00033O-Pe for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:11 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LhvdC-00060c-7Y; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:52:10 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LhvdB-00060Q-OP for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:52:09 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LhvTc-0001we-Bc; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.517839.B517839.12369048535031(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517839 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 517839-submit(a)bugs.debian.org id�17839.12369048535031 (code B ref 517839); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000 Received: (at 517839) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 00:40:53 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 53; hammy, 151; neutral, 243; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,IMPRONONCABLE_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <luca(a)pca.it>) id 1LhvQQ-0000Oj-Kg; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:38:58 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (139-205.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.0.205.139]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KGF001705SRXH00(a)victor.unige.ch>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C8C02C494; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: Christoph Egger <debian(a)christoph-egger.org> CC: 517839(a)bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel <slime-devel(a)common-lisp.net> References: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX> Message-ID: <877i2u1ckp.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it>, 517839(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:12 -0000 --=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Updating SLIME in testing fails on configuration. See the aptitude > output attached to this mail. Please always set LANG=C when you provide logs, since it is difficult to parse foreign languages ;-) I can reproduce the bug on a clean cowbuilder chroot: first, I created it for lenny, then installed slime together with xemacs21 and emacs22 (no errors). After that I modified apt's sources.list to point to testing: ===== root@gismo:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release.gpg [197B] Get:2 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release [71.6kB] Get:3 http://cdn.debian.net testing/main Packages [5533kB] Fetched 5604kB in 11s (497kB/s) Reading package lists... Done root@gismo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade [...] The following packages will be upgraded: aptitude base-files bash binutils cl-swank cowdancer cpio cpp cpp-4.3 debconf debconf-i18n debianutils fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.3 gcc gcc-4.3 gcc-4.3-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip libc6 libc6-dev libdb4.6 libept0 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgmp3c2 libgnutls26 libgomp1 libice6 libmpfr1ldbl libncurses5 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libsepol1 libsm6 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.3-dev libtasn1-3 libxapian15 libxau6 libxaw7 mawk mktemp ncurses-base ncurses-bin pbuilder readline-common realpath sed slime tzdata 56 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.5MB/38.7MB of archives. After this operation, 3084kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y [...] ===== > Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el... > While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el: > !! error (("Required feature arc-mode was not provided")) >>>Error occurred processing slime.el: > Required feature arc-mode was not provided This is the problem, specific to xemacs21 and not emacs22. The problem is in slime.el at line 69: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (require 'overlay)) (require 'easymenu) (eval-when (compile) (require 'arc-mode) (require 'apropos) (require 'outline) (require 'etags)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This has already been reported upstream, see the discussion at http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2008-October/015633.html Quoting Helmut Heller from the thread above: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote: > * Steven E. Harris [2008-10-27 00:21+0100] writes: > >>> Byte-compilation doesn't work in XEmacs, though. >> >> In general, or as a result of this change? Before my last post, I was >> able to byte-compile slime.el when I commented out the `require' form, >> but I concede that I didn't test the result. > > It doesn't work because arc-mode.el in XEmacs provides 'archive-mode > instead of 'arc-mode. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Since on Debian we byte-compile emacsen files at installation, I do not know how to proceed here. Is not this a bug in XEmacs? I would say so and thus reassign the bug to xemacs21. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5qxYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPSfAP7BlHtMm89+ObsfNQ8XWbbQvPM GcQITkl0/ph91CZEVk3bQ6KBBUqZHlOCnSe3XE+93Ik4BLcV749pIKQaBNYYJ5al XzluYLfKU4fGKtOHvKgzaXbPr6nxVHvgvIpoujEydai1hpQ+2R0ciQiTHIhAIEvZ 5zZe/+mVO0wuXnXQfu0=uktn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:12:54 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LhvxE-0003Ai-Lf for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LhvxE-0001oX-4P; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:52 +0000 Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1LhvxD-0001oL-Nh for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:51 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: debian-devel-changes(a)lists.debian.org X-Dak: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: slime MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <E1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3(a)ries.debian.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst, prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20090217-2 (source all) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU�9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:18:48 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Lhw2w-0003DM-Q2 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Lhw2w-0002k9-6d; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:46 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Lhw2v-0002jw-Nu for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:45 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LhvzO-0007jY-2J; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.518021.D518021.123690683726888.ackdone(a)bugs.debian.org> References: <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em(a)ries.debian.org> <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug(a)PPP0193985.mtu> X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518021 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:05 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1236906905-29624-0" Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em(a)ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518021: marked as done (aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em(a)ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org with problems ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2009 15:58:55 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 32; hammy, 149; neutral, 89; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.997-1--H*M:4011, 0.993-1--H*MI:4011 hammytokens:0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*UA:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:3.48 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests�YES_00,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,SPF_PASS,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: <dlia-spama(a)mail.ru> Received: from mx48.mail.ru ([94.100.176.62]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <dlia-spama(a)mail.ru>) id 1LeWc9-0005jN-Bj for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:33:01 +0000 Received: from [91.76.197.248] (portQ851 helo=PPP0193985.mtu) by mx48.mail.ru with asmtp id 1LeWc2-0000No-00; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:54 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mikhail Vasil'jev <dlia-spama(a)mail.ru> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Subject: aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze Message-ID: <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug(a)PPP0193985.mtu> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.48 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:29 +0300 X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Package: slime Version: 1:20090217-1 Severity: normal I upgraded Lenny to Squeeze today, and tried to purge slime. sudo aptitude purge slime Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: slime{p} 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 2269kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y Writing extended state information... Done (Reading database ... 123269 files and directories currently installed.) Removing slime ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/slime.prerm: line 24: unregister-common-lisp-source: command not found dpkg: error processing slime (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: slime E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages slime depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.17 Common facilities for all emacsen Versions of packages slime recommends: pn cl-swank <none> (no description available) ii emacs [info-browser] 22.2+2-5 The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage) ii emacs22 [info-browser] 22.2+2-5 The GNU Emacs editor ii info [info-browser] 4.11.dfsg.1-4 Standalone GNU Info documentation slime suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 518021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 73; hammy, 151; neutral, 84; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster@debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz, 0.000-+--v149 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_1, IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org> Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1LhvyH-0006z7-4O for 518021-close(a)bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: 518021-close(a)bugs.debian.org X-DAK: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: slime MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 Message-Id: <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em(a)ries.debian.org> Sender: Archive Administrator <dak(a)ries.debian.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Source: slime Source-Version: 1:20090217-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of slime, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 518021(a)bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> (supplier of updated slime package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster(a)debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU�9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1236906905-29624-0-- >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 10:59:26 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Li56r-0005QX-Oa for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:26 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Li56q-0001pU-Qc; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:24 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Li56q-0001pI-DA for gclcvs(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:24 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Li55B-0005aF-OM; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luk Claes <luk(a)debian.org> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Camm Maguire <camm(a)debian.org> Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.519534.B.123694170816101(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 519534 X-Debian-PR-Package: gclcvs X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: gclcvs Received: via spool by submit(a)bugs.debian.org id=B.123694170816101 (code B ref -1); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 10:55:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 124; neutral, 31; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--sk:buildd, 0.000-+--podebconf, 0.000-+--po-debconf, 0.000-+--builddepends X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER, HAS_PACKAGE,IMPRONONCABLE_1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.173]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <luk(a)debian.org>) id 1Li52h-00045R-PL for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:55:07 +0000 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAL7XuUlbsO7u/2dsb2JhbACBTs4gg34G Received: from 238.238-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO station.luk.local) ([91.176.238.238]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2009 11:55:00 +0100 Received: from luk by station.luk.local with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <luk(a)debian.org>) id 1Li53W-0000an-QS for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100 From: Luk Claes <luk(a)debian.org> To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20090313105558.GM1936(a)station.luk.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000 Delivered-To: gclcvs(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: gclcvs(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: gclcvs X-PTS-Package: gclcvs X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: gclcvs Version: 2.7.0-96 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Subject: Re: Log for failed build of gclcvs_2.7.0-96 on alpha Reply-To: [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_H >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:35 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULD-0002Lo-31 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:35 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmzFi-0000DV-0E for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:50 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmzFh-0000DG-Ds for libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:49 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmzD7-0004Ae-5K; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.518877.D518877.123811082315010.ackdone(a)bugs.debian.org> References: <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H(a)ries.debian.org> <200903081758.37343.schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518877 X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debian-PR-Source: libsigsegv Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1238110929-16024-0" Delivered-To: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with message-id <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H(a)ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be marked as done. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: marked as done (libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with message-id <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H(a)ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org with problems ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 111; neutral, 40; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu>) id 1LgTpH-0001vV-28 for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090309005833.SPIQ3931.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com(a)frobnitz.localnet> for <submit(a)bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:58:33 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:58:37 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903081758.37343.schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Package: libsigsegv Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. touch aclocal.m4 && \ touch configure # autoconf's stuff for bug #466356 cp configure configure.ORG autoconf aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [config.status] Error 63 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 518877-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 61; hammy, 151; neutral, 108; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster@debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz, 0.000-+--v149 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_2, MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org> Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1LmzBP-0003ta-6j for 518877-close(a)bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1Lmyow-0006eE-9H; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: 518877-close(a)bugs.debian.org X-DAK: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 Message-Id: <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H(a)ries.debian.org> Sender: Archive Administrator <dak(a)ries.debian.org> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Source: libsigsegv Source-Version: 2.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libsigsegv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 518877(a)bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> (supplier of updated libsigsegv package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster(a)debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green <plugwash(a)p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI=EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1238110929-16024-0-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:34 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULB-0002Lo-Ht for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:33 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmyWE-0000Zy-7r; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:50 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyWD-0000Za-A3; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:49 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyJz-0008ON-AH; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> (sbcl for {519920}, clswank for {519920,517167}) In-Reply-To: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> References: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810735229648.transcript(a)bugs.debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 -0000 Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > severity 519920 normal Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Severity set to `normal' from `normal' > merge 517167 519920 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Merged 517167 519920. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:37 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Gj for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmyrF-00058r-7C for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:33 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyrE-00058Z-NJ for libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:32 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Lmyk0-0005sM-Ac; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> (libsigsegv for {518877}) In-Reply-To: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> References: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810894220094.transcript(a)bugs.debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > tags 518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > tags 518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULD-0002Lo-Tw for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmzCQ-0008Fs-QJ for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000 Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1LmzCQ-0008Fh-7S for libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <envelope(a)ftp-master.debian.org>) id 1Lmyow-0006eC-8N; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: debian-devel-changes(a)lists.debian.org X-Dak: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <E1Lmyow-0006eC-8N(a)ries.debian.org> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green <plugwash(a)p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted libsigsegv 2.5-3 (source amd64) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green <plugwash(a)p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI=EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc >From bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULC-0002Lo-7R for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:34 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1Ln01k-0000DX-4M; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:34:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Ln01j-0000DN-KJ for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:34:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Ln00M-0007nj-AC; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.456004.B456004.123811387429173(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 456004 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: help X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 456004-submit(a)bugs.debian.org id�56004.123811387429173 (code B ref 456004); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 456004) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2009 00:31:14 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 59; hammy, 149; neutral, 81; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.987-1--HTo:D*stanfordalumni.org, 0.952-+--evaluated hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <luca(a)pca.it>) id 1Lmzyb-0007Zz-Lp for 456004(a)bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:31:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH5002592RUBP00(a)victor.unige.ch> for 456004(a)bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 371AA2C0C9; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan(a)stanfordalumni.org> CC: 456004(a)bugs.debian.org References: <20071212212706.26920.85946.reportbug(a)corn.betterworld.us> <47698D40.8050001(a)mailworks.org> <1227990689.8876.17.camel(a)cotton.betterworld.us> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1227990689.8876.17.camel(a)cotton.betterworld.us> Message-ID: <8763hv4xix.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >> >> I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime does work for me in the end. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it>, 456004(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 --=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >> >> I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime does work for me in the end. The problem is the following lines: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (load (concat "/usr/share/" (if (boundp 'flavor) (symbol-name flavor) "emacs") "/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The full output helps understanding the problem ===== Setting up emacs22 (22.2+2-5) ... emacs-install emacs22 emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs22 emacsen-common: byte-compiling for emacs22 Loading /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el (source)... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Error while loading 50slime ===== /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is not present yet, thus the code I reported previously fails. ===== Wrote /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/debian-startup.elc install/slime: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs22 Loading 00debian-vars... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el (source)... ===== At this point, /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is present because we have already installed slime. Note that /u/s/emacs/site-list/slime/slime-autoloads.el is *always* present, which means one possible solution would be to always load that instead. This does not change anything WRT the current situation, because /u/s/emacs22/site-listp/slime-autoloads.el is exactly the same the slime package install. However, while this would solve the problem, it is not the correct solution, since what we want is to use the compiled elisp files, thus we should replace the above with a simpler (require 'slime-autoloads). The latter should be evaluated *only* if byte-compiled files have been generated, or, witch is the same, if the slime package has been completely installed through emacsen. Suggestions are welcome :-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMHkYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPKZwP/Q2Z0WKC/PqH1uugH5eDkIsS6 SLabH7O2CdJgrLKMfRph+67ckLVPckje4+Bs3Z8cHp/pWUBEGWvhLxdyr/Hl3Xs5 dGrciuln+/grsLnXHsQdb79WvWOgJif4je0RmCt7HYW+NMN2rZ79/RBufyuncDVx BEoHm+0zm4MQeyDOe0s=WFdK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:38 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Tf for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmymK-0003M8-3c for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmymJ-0003Lx-F4 for libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1Lmyjy-0005ry-FK; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.518877.B518877.123810894220104(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 518877 X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch Received: via spool by 518877-submit(a)bugs.debian.org id�18877.123810894220104 (code B ref 518877); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 518877) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 121; neutral, 30; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER, IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <luca(a)pca.it>) id 1Lmyh4-0005CJ-72; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH40024NYYVBP00(a)victor.unige.ch>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4552C0C9; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: peter green <plugwash(a)p10link.net> CC: 518877(a)bugs.debian.org, Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <49C4654A.1050305(a)p10link.net> References: <49C4654A.1050305(a)p10link.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it>, 518877(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 --=-=- tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. Thank you, applied: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsigsegv.git;a=commitdiff;hccc3a… Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCwIACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMLKwQArtXAeI26G/WtnUNWz3/VKFkR AQpV63r/uDEKtjyZ0gszKWSYlHBjv0Ajgq/Sm5JCCi9ie7H23HckRuqEAgvzkQmK iS+l9v92FfhOPuI3XUSVXluigs8dcauiLRoVhoUnhzQ0duDEJPR9n7Ykao3AcQlt g79eYrH58ReWJMnGZ0Q=tywT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:39 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULG-0002Lo-VA for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:39 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmyES-00059u-1Z; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:39:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyER-00059k-L8 for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:39:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyBB-0005NP-Am; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org From: owner(a)bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> (slime for {517167}, clswank for {517167}) In-Reply-To: <87tz5f7w22.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> References: <87tz5f7w22.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810688215715.transcript(a)bugs.debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found 517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found 517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:40 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LnULH-0002Lo-Ck for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LmyFY-0005Jb-NC; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:36 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyFX-0005J9-RT for slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:36 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LmyB8-0005MI-MN; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.517167.B517167.123810688215735(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517167 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 517167-submit(a)bugs.debian.org id�17167.123810688215735 (code B ref 517167); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 517167) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 22:34:42 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 76; hammy, 151; neutral, 248; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <luca(a)pca.it>) id 1Lmy9p-0003vz-NL; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:34:41 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH400249XDMBP00(a)victor.unige.ch>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B8202C0C9; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> To: "A.W." <gzeusmants(a)gmail.com> CC: 517167(a)bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel <slime-devel(a)common-lisp.net> References: <613b861a0902252149s61a17530p932d3621ad97dc29(a)mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87tz5f7w22.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Delivered-To: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it>, 517167(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:41 -0000 --=-=-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: slime The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-swank one, reassigned. > Version: 1:20090217 This is not a proper Debian version, which is always in the form $UPSTREAM_VERSION-$DEBIAN_REVISION For the next time, can you please submit bugs using the reportbug tool, as explained in the following link? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting This also helps the environment in which you have experienced the bug, e.g. versions of other dependendent packages and so on. > Starting a new swank server with the following code > > (require 'asdf) This is not needed since ASDF is loaded by default on Debian Common Lisp implementations. > (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank) This works as expected. > ;Specifically, this line\/ What does this mean? > (swank:start-server :dont-close t) > > results in the following error: > > debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread #<THREAD > "initial thread" RUNNING {AA6A649}>: > odd number of &KEY arguments Are you sure that `start-server' is intended to be used from a CL implementation? The source code seems to disagree with this use: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun start-server (port-file &key (style *communication-style*) (dont-close *dont-close*) (coding-system *coding-system*)) "Start the server and write the listen port number to PORT-FILE. This is the entry point for Emacs." (setup-server 0 (lambda (port) (announce-server-port port-file port)) style dont-close (find-external-format-or-lose coding-system))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Leaving the rest of your mail for the slime-devel@ mailing list. > Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. > > restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): > 0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. > > (SWANK:START-SERVER :DONT-CLOSE)[:EXTERNAL] > > > A longer backtrace when trying to load the same code from stumpwm via > stumpwm-mode, though I think all relevant information is the same: > > > odd number of &KEY arguments0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE > (LAMBDA #) {B95CCAD}>)[:EXTERNAL] > 1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {B95CC59}>) > 2: (BACKTRACE-STRING) > 3: (ERR "~A")[:EXTERNAL] > 4: (EVAL-LINE "(swank:start-server :dont-close t)") > 5: (CALL-INTERACTIVELY > "eval" > #S(ARGUMENT-LINE > :STRING "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" > :START 39)) > 6: (EVAL-COMMAND "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" NIL) > 7: (HANDLE-STUMPWM-COMMANDS #<XLIB:WINDOW :0 67>) > 8: (HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL] > 9: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK)) > 10: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]509)) > 11: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK > #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {B77FDCB5}> > #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX > :NAME "CLX Event Lock" > :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING {B696571}> > :STATE 1)) > 12: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation > R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL] > 13: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP) > 14: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0") > 15: (STUMPWM ":0") > 16: ((LAMBDA ())) > 17: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP)) > > > I don't have any suggestions at the moment, though perhaps the > upstream slime will have a fix soon. It's possible that this is an > sbcl bug, but what research I'm able to do points me to slime/swank. > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux Sid, updated. --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMAvYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMqIwP9FqyzS7nCxNE4drYp9Dq/tJZ4 pY2Sf+k46uVdSz8tBqwaB4WWYsQ7H3SNvWMxToBS9B3QVua1sOvfRr3tQ20ym4sP p9xfVEx2n80I33g7KvZmMFap9IxhZeE1mmm4C64XIDcwOgOYB6ryjqYirY7mUa/8 GnaXUmcaiZShs/T0bxs=NMSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 16:45:49 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoOMe-0003vg-6A for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:45:49 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoNyh-0002JV-5G for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:21:03 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LoNyg-0002Iu-FY for clisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:21:02 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LoNvn-0006y9-O8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.521906.B.123844401222508(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521906 X-Debian-PR-Package: clisp X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: clisp Received: via spool by submit(a)bugs.debian.org id=B.123844401222508 (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 68; hammy, 141; neutral, 36; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu>) id 1LoNrP-0005oj-TF for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090330201318.HIGC23691.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com(a)frobnitz.localnet> for <submit(a)bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:26 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:13:39 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200903301313.40166.schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000 Delivered-To: clisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: clisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: clisp X-PTS-Package: clisp X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ; ; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ; ; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ; ; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ; ; packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199, 932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC -I.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list': bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db' make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521906: clisp: FTBFS: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu>, 521906(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:45:49 -0000 Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ;; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ;; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ;; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ;; packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199,932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC -I.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list': bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db' make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:14:01 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoOnw-0004ls-TB for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:14:01 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: luca(a)pca.it X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <87iqltagyk.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02(a)master.debian.org> <87vdpqivhn.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87vdpqivhn.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe cl-lw-compat cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:14:01 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe cl-lw-compat cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-syslog cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-typesetting cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-ubf cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-uffi cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-unit cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-units cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-utilities cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-who cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-xmls cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > thanks Stopping processing here. >From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:35:14 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoP8U-0005cn-7h for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:35:14 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoP8T-0005Kw-Fa for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:13 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LoP8S-0005KH-R0 for gcl(a)packages.qa.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:12 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs(a)rietz.debian.org>) id 1LoP6P-0003R9-4F; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:15 +0000 X-Loop: owner(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist(a)lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Camm Maguire <camm(a)enhanced.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.521929.B.12384484769463(a)bugs.debian.org> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521929 X-Debian-PR-Package: gcl X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: gcl Received: via spool by submit(a)bugs.debian.org id=B.12384484769463 (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 21:27:56 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 34; hammy, 127; neutral, 33; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu>) id 1LoP0x-0002LG-DI for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:32 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090330212718.VCIW27506.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com(a)frobnitz.localnet> for <submit(a)bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:21 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:27:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200903301427.36990.schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:05 +0000 Delivered-To: gcl(a)packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: gcl(a)packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: gcl X-PTS-Package: gcl X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl, -Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp ./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_section_contents': /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: undefined reference to `inflateInit_' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: undefined reference to `inflate' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: undefined reference to `inflateReset' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: undefined reference to `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler [...] Content analysis details: (-3.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521929: gcl: FTBFS: current binutils static libs need -lz X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Daniel Schepler <schepler(a)math.berkeley.edu>, 521929(a)bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:14 -0000 Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl,-Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp ./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_section_contents': /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: undefined reference to `inflateInit_' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: undefined reference to `inflate' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: undefined reference to `inflateReset' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: undefined reference to `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:37:07 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPAI-0005df-Ts for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:37:07 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPAI-0005iK-5V; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.303.1238447496.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87myb2hevd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87myb2hevd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPAI-0005iK-5V(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-lw-compat X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:07 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:36 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:00:27 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPWs-0006uT-T1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:27 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.302.1238447494.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87skkufz81.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87skkufz81.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-uffi(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-uffi X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:27 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-uffi(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:00 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPXP-00071k-R3; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:00 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPXP-0003eK-7r; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.301.1238447494.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87ocvifz72.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87ocvifz72.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPXP-0003eK-7r(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-syslog(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-syslog X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:00 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-syslog(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:28 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPXs-00072D-D4; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:28 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPXr-0003o1-GV; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.305.1238447499.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87iqlqfz6a.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87iqlqfz6a.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPXr-0003o1-GV(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-ubf(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-ubf X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:28 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-ubf(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:55 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPYI-00072f-RJ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:55 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.304.1238447499.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87eiwefz5m.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87eiwefz5m.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-typesetting(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-typesetting X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:55 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-typesetting(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:02:42 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZ4-00073T-6H; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:02:42 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZ3-00046K-GU; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.306.1238447574.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <878wmmfz48.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <878wmmfz48.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPZ3-00046K-GU(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-who(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-who X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:42 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-who(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:12:54 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:07 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZS-00073r-Ou; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:07 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.307.1238447641.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <874oxafz3l.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <874oxafz3l.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 071afd2345e5a788643408a4073bc122 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-xmls(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-xmls X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:07 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 071afd2345e5a788643408a4073bc122 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-xmls(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:01 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:31 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZr-00074H-1v; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:31 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPZq-0004Oa-DX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.308.1238447645.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87zlf2ekif.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87zlf2ekif.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPZq-0004Oa-DX(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:30 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 68893b5728b3b8e6ba17b87d086ad69d cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-unit(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-unit X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:31 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 68893b5728b3b8e6ba17b87d086ad69d cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-unit(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:05 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:57 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPaH-00074o-22; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:57 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPaG-0004Ty-D8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.311.1238447689.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87vdpqekhp.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87vdpqekhp.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPaG-0004Ty-D8(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:56 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ee1e940a0f5cc5dbe470e93944e0bf2c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-units(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-units X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:57 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ee1e940a0f5cc5dbe470e93944e0bf2c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-units(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:49 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:04:19 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPac-00075K-9c; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:04:18 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPab-0004YI-N4; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.312.1238447689.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87r60eekh4.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87r60eekh4.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPab-0004YI-N4(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:17 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 4e9e1a6e97ff157a9fe9181f24f9c198 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-utilities(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-utilities X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:19 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 4e9e1a6e97ff157a9fe9181f24f9c198 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-utilities(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:14:49 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:08:19 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPeU-00078D-M4 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:08:19 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoPeT-0005n2-VE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: luca(a)pca.it X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <87iqltagyk.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02(a)master.debian.org> <87hc1aekai.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87hc1aekai.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoPeT-0005n2-VE(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:17 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe clisp cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:20 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe clisp cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cltl cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cmucl cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe common-lisp-controller cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe dh-lisp cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe ecl cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe fiveam cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe gcl cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe gclcvs cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe hyperspec cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe ironclad cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > thanks Stopping processing here. >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:36:54 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ6A-00080j-60; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:36:54 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ69-0006A3-Ce; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.331.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87k566bptw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87k566bptw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQ69-0006A3-Ce(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 779e840b8acfa9d1db5a66033d92b947 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cltl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cltl X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:54 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 779e840b8acfa9d1db5a66033d92b947 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cltl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:37:30 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ6j-00081B-WA; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:37:30 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ6j-0006IB-Ac; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.324.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87fxgubpsw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87fxgubpsw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQ6j-0006IB-Ac(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:29 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 85e6092a39b4ee9869d07d3e008767f5 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cmucl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cmucl X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:30 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 85e6092a39b4ee9869d07d3e008767f5 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cmucl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:40:21 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ9U-0008Om-CT; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:40:20 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ9T-000776-Or; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:19 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.323.1238450900.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87bpribpo6.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87bpribpo6.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQ9T-000776-Or(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:19 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 78f73be3d2896de2d004a987ba23f70c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gcl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gcl X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:21 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 78f73be3d2896de2d004a987ba23f70c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gcl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:40:45 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ9t-0000B7-0U; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:40:45 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQ9s-0007Ba-8h; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.332.1238450902.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <877i26bpnh.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <877i26bpnh.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQ9s-0007Ba-8h(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:44 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM d5c83c45f74f9da430e43e205e5aa2e2 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from fiveam(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to fiveam X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:45 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM d5c83c45f74f9da430e43e205e5aa2e2 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from fiveam(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:22 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:07 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQAF-0000BZ-CE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:07 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQAE-0007Gi-SZ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.325.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <873acubpmv.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <873acubpmv.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQAE-0007Gi-SZ(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:06 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 9ca047957c10e3ce460da425101124ea cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from dh-lisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to dh-lisp X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:07 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 9ca047957c10e3ce460da425101124ea cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from dh-lisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:30 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQAb-0000C3-L1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:29 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQAb-0007Mp-4E; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.327.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87y6umab1s.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87y6umab1s.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQAb-0007Mp-4E(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:29 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM b7d1a3b77e54772c4c9719a02319bce9 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ecl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ecl X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:30 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM b7d1a3b77e54772c4c9719a02319bce9 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ecl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:41:54 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQB0-0000CZ-2o; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:41:54 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQAz-0007SY-BR; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.333.1238450903.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87tz5aab14.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87tz5aab14.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQAz-0007SY-BR(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:53 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 91c52cbe296893fd779dac77b6fc31e4 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from common-lisp-controller(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to common-lisp-controller X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:54 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 91c52cbe296893fd779dac77b6fc31e4 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from common-lisp-controller(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:23 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:42:17 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQBM-0000Cw-R6; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:17 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQBM-0007aj-8K; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.330.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87prfyab0h.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87prfyab0h.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQBM-0007aj-8K(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fc9a9617f67cb2c3713af078541e9643 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gclcvs(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gclcvs X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:17 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fc9a9617f67cb2c3713af078541e9643 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from gclcvs(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:42:38 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQBi-0000DO-8t; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:38 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQBh-0007g8-N1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.329.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87ljqmaazw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87ljqmaazw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQBh-0007g8-N1(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 64e71e78a8731d6034fd83d6912deb3b cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ironclad(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ironclad X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:38 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 64e71e78a8731d6034fd83d6912deb3b cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from ironclad(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:43:00 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQC3-0000Do-GZ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:59 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQC2-0007mp-P8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.328.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87hc1aaazb.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87hc1aaazb.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQC2-0007mp-P8(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:58 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 84df9fe237364395d77fad155dda7df8 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from hyperspec(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to hyperspec X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:00 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 84df9fe237364395d77fad155dda7df8 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from hyperspec(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:43:19 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQCM-0000E8-QB; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:43:19 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQCM-0007zI-Ax; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.326.1238450901.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87d4byaayr.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87d4byaayr.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQCM-0007zI-Ax(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:18 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 83afe6115d98307892e3e3fc82cf01aa cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from clisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to clisp X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:19 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 83afe6115d98307892e3e3fc82cf01aa cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from clisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:08:21 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:46:54 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQFn-0000Gb-Ng for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:46:54 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQFn-0000I8-0D; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: luca(a)pca.it X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <87iqltagyk.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02(a)master.debian.org> <87vdpq8w8h.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87vdpq8w8h.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQFn-0000I8-0D(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:51 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe libsigsegv cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:56 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe libsigsegv cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe memoization cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe onlisp cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe parenscript cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe qbook cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe quick-arrays cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe rfc2388 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe s-xml cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe series cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe slime cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe stumpwm cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe tbnl cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe trivial-sockets cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe url-rewrite cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe xml-to-sexp cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net. > thanks Stopping processing here. >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:31:36 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQx5-0001uD-Hi; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:31:35 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQx4-0002Dt-Fy; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.339.1238453214.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87k5666110.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87k5666110.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQx4-0002Dt-Fy(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:34 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM a0d8afc9c8160f5e320316aebf9359f5 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from trivial-sockets(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to trivial-sockets X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:36 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM a0d8afc9c8160f5e320316aebf9359f5 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from trivial-sockets(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:54 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:32:17 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQxk-0001v1-Oq; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:32:17 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQxk-0002LP-5Q; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.342.1238453215.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87fxgu60zx.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87fxgu60zx.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQxk-0002LP-5Q(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:16 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 6dad84e37164ccf1322f300ec6cf9281 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to libsigsegv X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:17 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 6dad84e37164ccf1322f300ec6cf9281 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from libsigsegv(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:32:37 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQy5-0001vs-CN; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:32:37 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQy4-0002PU-Ef; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.340.1238453215.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87bpri60z9.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87bpri60z9.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQy4-0002PU-Ef(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:36 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8149aa0cf00464c630f2ac08a31ec457 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from memoization(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to memoization X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:38 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8149aa0cf00464c630f2ac08a31ec457 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from memoization(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:03 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQyV-0001wU-6C; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:03 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQyU-0002Vx-B3; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.341.1238453215.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <877i2660yj.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <877i2660yj.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQyU-0002Vx-B3(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:02 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 3cbefbc4629628054d57d66b85b25d72 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from quick-arrays(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to quick-arrays X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:04 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 3cbefbc4629628054d57d66b85b25d72 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from quick-arrays(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:55 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:24 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQyp-0001x5-Mk; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:23 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQyo-0002ha-S8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.343.1238453217.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <873acu60xz.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <873acu60xz.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQyo-0002ha-S8(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:22 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 088a7b0fec277e1fd86aa25984fd97bc cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from url-rewrite(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to url-rewrite X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:24 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 088a7b0fec277e1fd86aa25984fd97bc cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from url-rewrite(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:33:44 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQz9-0001xT-LX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:33:43 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQz8-0002mb-VF; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.345.1238453217.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87y6um4mcy.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87y6um4mcy.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQz8-0002mb-VF(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:42 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM afb5037e80ad82ea49b965967358aa23 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from xml-to-sexp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to xml-to-sexp X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:44 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM afb5037e80ad82ea49b965967358aa23 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from xml-to-sexp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:34:05 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQzU-0001xo-UE; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:34:05 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQzU-0002rb-95; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.352.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87tz5a4mcd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87tz5a4mcd.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQzU-0002rb-95(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:04 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 1cef9d2631aa3aa021832cdf3ec1c7c4 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from s-xml(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to s-xml X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:05 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 1cef9d2631aa3aa021832cdf3ec1c7c4 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from s-xml(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:34:24 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQzn-0001yJ-VI; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:34:24 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoQzn-0002va-Bc; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.347.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87prfy4mbu.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87prfy4mbu.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoQzn-0002va-Bc(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:23 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 53d0cac64412cc900dac1c5d0efa5373 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to slime X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:24 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 53d0cac64412cc900dac1c5d0efa5373 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from slime(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:35:33 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR0v-00021N-ED; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:35:33 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR0r-0003Cm-Ro; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.344.1238453217.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87d4by4ma1.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87d4by4ma1.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoR0r-0003Cm-Ro(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:29 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 67defe54e5548c86293ccffa4868ba97 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from parenscript(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to parenscript X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:33 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 67defe54e5548c86293ccffa4868ba97 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from parenscript(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:35:55 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR1G-00021g-GB; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:35:54 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR1D-0003Go-R2; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.348.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <878wmm4m9i.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <878wmm4m9i.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoR1D-0003Go-R2(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:51 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 589ad073ba96a3e3586f2841f7dcab8b cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from tbnl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to tbnl X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:55 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 589ad073ba96a3e3586f2841f7dcab8b cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from tbnl(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:36:40 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR1z-00022Z-MC; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:40 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR1y-0003VI-Tu; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.353.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87y6um37nn.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87y6um37nn.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoR1y-0003VI-Tu(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:38 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 0e16ced572a1200ac4f6d56a803c645c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from series(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to series X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:40 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 0e16ced572a1200ac4f6d56a803c645c cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from series(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:37:08 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR2Q-00022x-FX; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:37:08 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoR2P-0003am-6q; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.349.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87tz5a37mx.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87tz5a37mx.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoR2P-0003am-6q(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM b88b49ede2391b500c56974b5ffd9f5d cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from onlisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to onlisp X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:09 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM b88b49ede2391b500c56974b5ffd9f5d cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from onlisp(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:52:32 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRHL-0002jx-R1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:52:32 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRHL-0008Ah-38; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.351.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87wsa61scq.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87wsa61scq.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoRHL-0008Ah-38(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:31 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM cf8da2a18066aca6a7511392fa1ac604 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from stumpwm(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to stumpwm X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:32 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM cf8da2a18066aca6a7511392fa1ac604 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from stumpwm(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:53:04 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRHr-0002kO-Nr; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:04 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRHr-0008Kp-60; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.350.1238453218.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87skku1sbw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87skku1sbw.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoRHr-0008Kp-60(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:03 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM d1004b64e66f6823a01e5aaa930d7a97 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from rfc2388(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to rfc2388 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:04 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM d1004b64e66f6823a01e5aaa930d7a97 cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from rfc2388(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:58 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 19:53:28 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRIG-0002ko-Ho; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:28 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounces(a)packages.qa.debian.org>) id 1LoRIE-00006f-Pj; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner(a)packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner(a)common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts(a)qa.debian.org References: <mailman.346.1238453217.1833.cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net> <87ocvi1sb7.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87ocvi1sb7.fsf(a)gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Message-Id: <E1LoRIE-00006f-Pj(a)master.debian.org> Sender: Debian QA <qa(a)master.debian.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:26 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 5f4a0ae6e1be87c0f7759b3c98f49ebd cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from qbook(a)packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to qbook X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:29 -0000 Processing commands for pts(a)qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 5f4a0ae6e1be87c0f7759b3c98f49ebd cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from qbook(a)packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:46:57 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri May 15 22:05:14 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1M59Gz-0000h2-UR for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:14 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cl-cairo2-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1M59Gq-0000gi-RT; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:05 -0400 Received: from postoffice03.princeton.edu ([128.112.131.174] helo=Princeton.EDU) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tpapp(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu>) id 1M59Gp-0000gY-8g; Fri, 15 May 2009 22:05:03 -0400 Received: from smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.148]) by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4G1pTwH001978; Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pu100877.student.princeton.edu (pu100877.student.Princeton.EDU [140.180.166.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n4G1pTSG016069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher�S-CBC3-SHA bits8 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tpapp by pu100877.student.princeton.edu with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tpapp(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu>) id 1M593f-0001VO-Ee; Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:51:27 -0400 From: Tamas K Papp <tpapp(a)Princeton.EDU> To: cl-cairo2-devel(a)common-lisp.net, cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net, Kei Suzuki <ksdevx(a)gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090516015127.GA5341(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everyone, I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write [...] Content analysis details: (-3.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2190] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everyone, I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everyone, I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-cairo2-announce] syntax change in cl-cairo2 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:05:14 -0000 Hi everyone, I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now. The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write (move-to context 0 -2) instead of (move-to 0 -2 context) or (setf *context*) (move-to 0 -2) I know this is an important change in syntax, and may break a lot of code. I apologize for the inconvenience, but this has been a major wart on the initial design and I have always wanted to fix it. Best, Tamas _______________________________________________ cl-cairo2-announce mailing list cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-cairo2-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun May 24 12:11:13 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1M8GI4-0005JX-9Z for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:12 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cl-cairo2-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1M8GHv-0005J9-6y; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:03 -0400 Received: from postoffice03.princeton.edu ([128.112.131.174] helo=Princeton.EDU) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tpapp(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu>) id 1M8GHr-0005Ir-Ak; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:11:00 -0400 Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.65]) by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4OGAwt0015986; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pu100877.student.princeton.edu (pu100877.student.Princeton.EDU [140.180.166.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n4OGAvZQ015307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher�S-CBC3-SHA bits8 verify=NOT); Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tpapp by pu100877.student.princeton.edu with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tpapp(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu>) id 1M8GHp-00010n-BN; Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:10:57 -0400 From: Tamas K Papp <tpapp(a)Princeton.EDU> To: cl-cairo2-devel(a)common-lisp.net, cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net, Kei Suzuki <ksdevx(a)gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090524161057.GA3825(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu> References: <20090516015127.GA5341(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090516015127.GA5341(a)pu100877.student.princeton.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi cl-cairo2 users, Comments after this change have persuaded me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2, please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi cl-cairo2 users, Comments after this change have persuaded me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2, please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi cl-cairo2 users, Comments after this change have persuaded me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2, please let me know what you think by commenting here: [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.131.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-cairo2-announce] syntax change in cl-cairo2 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:11:13 -0000 Hi cl-cairo2 users, Comments after this change have persuaded me to change the interface to something similar to the old one (but with a keyword argument). If you are still using cl-cairo2, please let me know what you think by commenting here: http://tkpapp.blogspot.com/2009/05/cl-cairo2-interface-poll.html Thanks, Tamas On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:51:27PM -0400, Tamas K Papp wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I pushed a new version of cl-cairo2 to the GIT repository > http://github.com/tpapp/cl-cairo2/tree/master where it is kept now. > > The most important change is that I disposed of the *context* global > variable, and moved context to the first argument, so now you write > > (move-to context 0 -2) > > instead of > > (move-to 0 -2 context) > > or > > (setf *context*) > (move-to 0 -2) > > I know this is an important change in syntax, and may break a lot of > code. I apologize for the inconvenience, but this has been a major > wart on the initial design and I have always wanted to fix it. > > Best, > > Tamas _______________________________________________ cl-cairo2-announce mailing list cl-cairo2-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-cairo2-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Mon Sep 21 06:11:12 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1MpfrU-0000OY-1n for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:12 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1MpfrL-0000O8-CL; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <vsedach(a)gmail.com>) id 1MpfrH-0000Nx-Np for parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:11:00 -0400 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2269400ewy.10 for <parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:10:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.3.14 with SMTP id 14mr2654980ebc.61.1253523601832; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:00:01 -0600 Message-ID: <c07e645b0909210200g5dbcb18at4398a2003d1ce6ea(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach(a)gmail.com> To: parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net, parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, A new version of Parenscript has been released. This release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND Common Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell), much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes, real and efficient lexical scoping for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been removed is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be special cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has been done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers designed for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on the dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot access. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, A new version of Parenscript has been released. This release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND Common Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell), much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes, real and efficient lexical scoping for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been removed is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be special cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has been done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers designed for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on the dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot access. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, A new version of Parenscript has been released. This release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND Common Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell), much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes, real and efficient lexical scoping for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been removed is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be special cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has been done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers designed for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on the dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot access. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript release. X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:11:12 -0000 Hello, A new version of Parenscript has been released. This release comes with partial support for LOOP and DESTRUCTURING-BIND Common Lisp facilities (thanks to the efforts of Daniel Gackle and Scott Bell), much faster compilation speed, many bugfixes, real and efficient lexical scoping for all special forms that introduce bindings, as well as the ability to direct compiler output directly to a stream. One thing that has been removed is support for the dot symbol notation (ie - 'object.property' would be special cased into (slot-value object 'property) by the compiler) - this has been done to allow Parenscript code to be a useful target for code walkers designed for regular Lisp code. The consequence is that any code that relies on the dot notation will need to be changed to use non-opaque object slot access. Thank you, Vladimir _______________________________________________ parenscript-announce mailing list parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed Oct 28 04:06:49 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1N33YP-0007At-4H for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:49 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cl-ppcre-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1N33Y0-0007Af-Ri; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:25 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1N33Xy-00079Y-E1 for cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:06:22 -0400 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so755804bwz.2 for <cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:04:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.48.210 with SMTP id s18mr8112477bkf.162.1256715739118; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:42:18 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: deb3d2156301164d Message-ID: <b56421a00910280042g491ea68bu78ae95f7294bf891(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list about cl-ppcre and cl-unicode <cl-ppcre-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download from the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to LispWorks users. Edi. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download from the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to LispWorks users. Edi. cl-ppcre-announce mailing list cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download from the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to LispWorks users. Edi. cl-ppcre-announce mailing list cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-ppcre-announce] New release 2.0.3 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:06:49 -0000 There's a new release 2.0.3 out which you can download from the usual place. The change from 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 is only relevant to LispWorks users. Edi. _______________________________________________ cl-ppcre-announce mailing list cl-ppcre-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Thu Nov 12 17:01:17 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1N8hjA-0005oU-DK for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:16 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1N8hj1-0005o2-4K for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:07 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1N8hiy-0005nI-Du for rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:04 -0500 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so2875826fxm.2 for <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:00:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.135 with SMTP id p7mr892579bkp.69.1258059430924; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:57:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:57:10 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 148f2ccab30b6fbc Message-ID: <b56421a00911121257v1a76b3c3j396ae7a8d349be07(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Raymond, I've just made a new release. I made a few cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've had a little startup trouble with RDNZL, but this is mainly due to my > lack of familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName will most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended, at some later point, to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes the trivial change to load-assembly, as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container. do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what do-rdnzl-arrays does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond, >> >> I have to admit that I rarely, if ever, used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state, but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it, I >> didn't keep track with .NET development and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches, >> but I won't be able to test or evaluate them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >> http://weitz.de/patches.html >> >> Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback mechanism that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C# interface) with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL can be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial to do), so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for interfacing with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this, probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Raymond, I've just made a new release. I made a few cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've had a little startup trouble with RDNZL, but this is mainly due to my > lack of familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName will most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended, at some later point, to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes the trivial change to load-assembly, as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container. do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what do-rdnzl-arrays does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond, >> >> I have to admit that I rarely, if ever, used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state, but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it, I >> didn't keep track with .NET development and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches, >> but I won't be able to test or evaluate them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >> http://weitz.de/patches.html >> >> Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback mechanism that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C# interface) with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL can be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial to do), so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for interfacing with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this, probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net, General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Raymond, I've just made a new release. I made a few cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've had a little startup trouble with RDNZL, but this is mainly due to my > lack of familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName will most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended, at some later point, to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes the trivial change to load-assembly, as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container. do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what do-rdnzl-arrays does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond, >> >> I have to admit that I rarely, if ever, used RDNZL myself. I started >> writing it for fun and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. At that time I was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state, but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it, I >> didn't keep track with .NET development and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches, >> but I won't be able to test or evaluate them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >> http://weitz.de/patches.html >> >> Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback mechanism that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C# interface) with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL can be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial to do), so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for interfacing with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this, probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.0 (Was: [rdnzl-devel] LoadWithPartialName vs Load) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:01:17 -0000 Thanks Raymond, I've just made a new release. I made a few cosmetic changes, so please check if I didn't break anything. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've had a little startup trouble with RDNZL, but �this is mainly due to my > lack of familiarity with .NET. The use of Load instead of > LoadWithPartialName will most likely not be noticed by most people, but will > provide (IMO) more helpful behaviour in case of errors. It can also be > extended, at some later point, to use fully-qualified assembly names. > > The enclosed patch includes the trivial change to load-assembly, as well as > a new macro called do-rdnzl-container. do-rdnzl-container does for general > enumerable collections what do-rdnzl-arrays does for arrays. > > Thank you for making rdnzl available! > > > > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:16 , Edi Weitz wrote: > >> Hi Raymond, >> >> I have to admit that I rarely, if ever, used RDNZL myself. �I started >> writing it for fun and only finished it because I gave a talk about >> it. �At that time I was ambitious enough to bring it into a usable >> state, but as I didn't have any serious projects relying on it, I >> didn't keep track with .NET development and I'm sure it's out of tune >> now. >> >> If you have changes to make RDNZL better, I'm happy to accept patches, >> but I won't be able to test or evaluate them due to lack of time. >> I'll simply pack them into a new release if they follow the usual >> patch guidelines: >> >> �http://weitz.de/patches.html >> >> Thanks, >> Edi. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I'm trying to use rdnzl to interface with certain .NET libraries. >>> These libraries have a callback mechanism that requires me to subclass >>> a C# class (or implement a C# interface) with two specific methods. I >>> haven't seen any mention that RDNZL can be used to subclass C# classes >>> (which I guess would be non-trivial to do), so I'm guessing that I >>> need to write a C# wrapper class for interfacing with Lisp. >>> >>> I'm having certain problems with this, probably caused by some .NET >>> details that I haven't (yet) understood. As part of unravelling this, >>> I've discovered that import-assembly calls load-assembly and that a >>> failure in load-assembly will cause a null assembly to be returned, >>> from which import-assembly will import exactly zero items. In other >>> words, any errors from load-assembly will not be signalled until >>> later. >>> >>> The MS documentation states that LoadWithPartialName (as used by >>> load-assembly) is an obsolete call, and that that >>> System.Reflection.Assembly.Load() should be used instead. Load() can >>> even be used with partial names, like this: >>> >>> (defun load-assembly-2 (name) >>> �(let ((fullname (new "System.Reflection.AssemblyName"))) >>> � (setf [%Name fullname] name) >>> � [System.Reflection.Assembly.Load fullname])) >>> >>> I've just tried this, and load-assembly-2 gives an exception which is >>> transferred perfectly through RDNZL in cases where load-assembly >>> returns null. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Raymond Wiker >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rdnzl-devel mailing list >>> rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net >>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rdnzl-devel mailing list >> rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel > > > _______________________________________________ rdnzl-announce mailing list rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Mon Nov 23 15:30:22 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NCfYE-0005qt-0Z for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:22 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cl-gd-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NCfXw-0005pd-0d; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:04 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f214.google.com ([209.85.218.214]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NCfXu-0005dB-1x; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:02 -0500 Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so5590693bwz.11 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:29:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.35.12 with SMTP id n12mr5165329bkd.147.1259006715823; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:05:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:05:15 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: beb2c78b86d5232d Message-ID: <b56421a00911231205u4c23011eo4accb9115b446d08(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham(a)comcast.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham(a)comcast.net>: > In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request, I slapped my forehead for > not seeing the debug statements, removed them, and here's the remade patch. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cl-gd-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham(a)comcast.net>: > In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request, I slapped my forehead for > not seeing the debug statements, removed them, and here's the remade patch. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: cl-gd-announce(a)common-lisp.net, General interest list about cl-gd <cl-gd-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham(a)comcast.net>: > In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request, I slapped my forehead for > not seeing the debug statements, removed them, and here's the remade patch. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cl-gd-announce] New release 0.5.7 (Was: cl-gd patch) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:30:23 -0000 2009/11/15 Jeff Cunningham <j.k.cunningham(a)comcast.net>: > In any event, now that I've seen Hans' request, I slapped my forehead for > not seeing the debug statements, removed them, and here's the remade patch. I've now uploaded release 0.5.7 which contains your patch. Thanks, Edi. _______________________________________________ cl-gd-announce mailing list cl-gd-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-gd-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Dec 01 18:13:01 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NFbu0-0000h9-Kk for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:13:01 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NFbtv-0000gw-OV; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:12:56 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NFbtt-0000gp-Bg for drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:12:53 -0500 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so4088938bwz.2 for <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:12:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.215 with SMTP id d23mr6744197bka.18.1259707419498; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:43:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:43:39 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 359cab6a3ed9b7e5 Message-ID: <b56421a00912011443m43dc4e8fgca209457557b384(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ...can be found at the usual location. If you update one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New releases (1.1.0) of Drakma and Chunga... X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:01 -0000 ...can be found at the usual location. If you update one of the libraries, please update both. What's new? http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt http://weitz.de/chunga/CHANGELOG.txt Thanks, Edi. _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 16:23:08 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGfcJ-00022e-E9 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:23:07 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGfcA-00022M-TP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:59 -0500 Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1NGfc7-00022F-1P for closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:22:56 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGoDGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWf4QzBA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 22:19:09 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74A590060 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:19:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LutP-HbU-9qX for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:19:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF3F59005D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:19:07 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:19:06 +0100 Message-Id: <464635B2-1004-4C91-A0C7-4133C4DE8B36(a)p-cos.net> To: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand, these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL, by way of using a separate system definition. (In that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used, so this should run in any ANSI-compliant Common Lisp implementation.) [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand, these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL, by way of using a separate system definition. (In that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used, so this should run in any ANSI-compliant Common Lisp implementation.) [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand, these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL, by way of using a separate system definition. (In that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used, so this should run in any ANSI-compliant Common Lisp implementation.) [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New version of ContextL (v0.6) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:23:08 -0000 Hi, I have just released a new version of ContextL. Here are the new features: + ContextL now supports delimited first-class dynamic environments and DYNAMIC-WIND. Due to popular demand, these feature can be used independently of the rest of ContextL, by way of using a separate system definition. (In that case, no features of CLOS MOP are used, so this should run in any ANSI-compliant Common Lisp implementation.) + Added support for Embeddable Common Lisp and resurrected support for Macintosh Common Lisp. Unfortunately, the CLOS MOP of Scieneer Common Lisp is too weak, so I cannot support ContextL there (yet). + Dependencies on portable-threads and trivial-garbage are removed - these libraries are no longer necessary for ContextL to work. + Improved use of synchronization features in multi-threaded Common Lisp implementations. + Lots of special thanks to the following people who provided useful patches and comments: Willem Broekema, Theam Yong Chew, Alexander Gravilov, Attila Lendvai, and Tobias Rittweiler. Extra special thanks to Duane Rettig (of Franz Inc.) and Martin Simmons (of LispWorks Ld.) for helping with Allegro-specific and LispWorks-specific issues. Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ closer-announce mailing list closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 16:24:12 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGfdL-00024E-IA for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:12 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGfdC-00023r-QQ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:03 -0500 Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1NGfdA-00023l-2m for closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:00 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGoDGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWf4ImBYIIBA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 22:12:33 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E685C590060 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:12:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSbbXRX2Wvm6 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:12:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF81459005D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:12:31 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:12:30 +0100 Message-Id: <FDDA4E82-A040-42AE-BC50-B1C47F26BCD4(a)p-cos.net> To: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This is a major new release, with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This is a major new release, with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -106.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This is a major new release, with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). [...] Content analysis details: (-106.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New release of Closer to MOP (v0.6) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:24:12 -0000 Hi, I have just released a new version of Closer to MOP. This is a major new release, with a couple of substantial improvements: + Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP (from ECL 9.12.2 on). + Macintosh Common Lisp has been reactivated as an open source project, and the support for MCL in Closer to MOP has been resurrected. + Scieneer Common Lisp is now supported to some degree as well. + In total, Closer to MOP now supports 9 different Common Lisp implementations: Allegro Common Lisp, CLisp, Clozure Common Lisp, CMU Common Lisp, Embeddable Common Lisp, LispWorks, Macintosh Common Lisp, Steel Bank Common Lisp, and Scieneer Common Lisp. + I have added support for the complete generic function invocation protocol. This includes COMPUTE-APPLICABLE-METHODS, COMPUTE-APPLICABLE-METHODS-USING-CLASSES, COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION, and COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD, and MAKE-METHOD-LAMBDA (!). On top of that, Closer to MOP adds a missing piece in the protocol, namely COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD-FUNCTION, for turning an effective method form into an actual function. Note, however, that support for the generic invocation is not available in all supported Common Lisp implementations: CMU Common Lisp, Macintosh Common Lisp and Scieneer Common Lisp unfortunately don't provide the necessary extensibility to support the protocols at all, and ECL has the slight restriction that method lambda forms have the same lambda list as the generic function for which they are defined, and not the format as specified in AMOP. + In previous Closer to MOP versions, the standard metobject definition macros and functions (DEFCLASS, DEFGENERIC, DEFMETHOD, ENSURE-CLASS, ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION, etc.) sometimes forced the use of the replacement 'standard' metaobject classes of Closer to MOP (STANDARD-CLASS, STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION and STANDARD-METHOD). This is now completely removed: If you don't use a :METACLASS or :GENERIC-FUNCTION-CLASS option explicitly, these defining operators will use the internal metaclasses of the respective Common Lisp implementation, under the assumption that they are usually more efficient than the replacements in Closer to MOP. If for some reason, you want to ensure to use the replacements, you have to do so explicitly. (Note: The main purpose of the replacements is to provide a common compatible basis for your own metaobject subclasses, not to be used in their own right.) + When synchronization is necessary, the code for Allegro Common Lisp and LispWorks now uses constructs that are compatible with their respective future SMP support. + In ECL and LispWorks, it is necessary to 'de-optimize' slot accesses for the reader and writer methods specified in DEFCLASS forms in order to ensure that SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS and (SETF SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS) are correctly used. This now only happens if there are actually applicable definitions available for them. Otherwise, they use the native optimized slot access. + Extra special thanks to Duane Rettig, Steve Haflich, and Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll for fixing extra hard bugs in extra short amount of time. Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ closer-announce mailing list closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Dec 04 17:20:08 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGgVT-0006mr-LS for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:20:08 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NGgVH-0006ma-Uh; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:19:56 -0500 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1NGgVE-0006mM-FA for closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:19:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAKMKGUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWeIQzBA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 23:08:22 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56A8590060 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:08:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcbyyQaUrREV for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:08:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [91.180.168.217]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE15B59005D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:08:20 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:08:20 +0100 Message-Id: <E811D50D-E4E6-4CDF-BE03-02074CF9679C(a)p-cos.net> To: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public release of 'filtered functions', an extension of generic functions that Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos, and myself have developed some time ago and that we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a number of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered functions, because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and requires a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification to quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library, that I released today as well. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0006] -2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public release of 'filtered functions', an extension of generic functions that Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos, and myself have developed some time ago and that we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a number of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered functions, because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and requires a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification to quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library, that I released today as well. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public release of 'filtered functions', an extension of generic functions that Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos, and myself have developed some time ago and that we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a number of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered functions, because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and requires a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification to quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library, that I released today as well. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] New project: filtered functions X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:20:08 -0000 Hi, I am very excited that I can finally annouce a public release of 'filtered functions', an extension of generic functions that Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos, and myself have developed some time ago and that we are very excited about because it seems to be quite powerful in a number of very different scenarios. It took a while to release filtered functions, because it is a quite non-trivial extension of generic functions and requires a CLOS MOP implementation that is compliant with the AMOP specification to quite a deep level. Therefore, this required some serious preparation in the form of a much improved Closer to MOP library, that I released today as well. You can find filtered functions at the Closer project website at http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ - below you will find a general overview of the concept. Filtered functions are an extension of generic functions, extended with a filtering step where the arguments received by a generic function are mapped to other values based on user-defined mapping functions. Those filtered values are then used to perform the actual selection and execution of applicable methods. Nevertheless, the methods that are eventually executed see the original objects as received by the generic function, and not the filtered ones. Here are some examples to illustrate the expressive power of filtered functions. Factorial ==== In order to be able to use filtered functions, we need to have filter functions that map received arguments to values that we actually want to base our dispatch on. For the factorial function, we want to distinguish between negative and positive numbers, and the number zero. For that we can just use the Common Lisp function SIGNUM that returns +1 for positive numbers, -1 for negative numbers, and just 0 for the number 0. The filtered function FAC can thus be defined as follows. (define-filtered-function fac (n) (:filters (:sign #'signum))) DEFINE-FILTERED-FUNCTION is exactly like DEFGENERIC, except that it can also define one or more filters. Here, it defines a filter with the name :SIGN wich specifices that the function SIGNUM is to be used for filtering. We can now define methods for FAC: (defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql +1))) (* n (fac (- n 1)))) (defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql 0))) 1) (defmethod fac :filter :sign ((n (eql -1))) (error "Fac not defined for negative numbers.")) Here, we use the qualifiers :FILTER :SIGN in the method definitions to indicate that we indeed want to use the :SIGN filter for method selection. We then use EQL specializers to ensure that the method definitions are applicable for the three different cases that SIGNUM yields. Remember that the method bodies always see the original arguments, not the filtered ones, and this is why the FAC methods can do the correct computations. State pattern ====== Filtered functions can be used to dispatch methods based on the state of an argument passed to a filtered function, which enables expressing State-like idioms. Assume the following simple CLOS class is defined for implementing a stack. (defconstant +stack-size+ 10) (defclass stack () ((contents :initform (make-array +stack-size+) :reader stack-contents)) (index :initform 0 :accessor stack-index))) Instances of this class have three different states: Such a stack can either be empty, or full, or anywhere in between (in 'normal' state). We can express this as a function that recognizes the state of a stack. (defun stack-state (stack) (cond ((<= (stack-index stack) 0) 'empty) ((>= (stack-index stack) +stack-size+) 'full) (t 'normal))) It is now straightforward to use stack-state in a filter named :state for the typical stack operations. (define-filtered-function stack-push (stack value) (:filters (:state #'stack-state))) (define-filtered-function stack-pop (stack) (:filters (:state #'stack-state))) (define-filtered-function stack-emptyp (stack) (:filters (:state #'stack-state))) We can now group the behavior of a stack according to its different states. Note that for 'normal' state, we do not need to mention the use of any filter here, because the methods are not specialized on anything specific anyway. (Filtered functions always allow for 'regular' methods alongside the filtered methods.) ;;; Normal state (defmethod stack-push (stack value) (setf (aref (stack-contents stack) (stack-index stack)) value) (incf (stack-index stack))) (defmethod stack-pop (stack) (decf (stack-index stack)) (aref (stack-contents stack) (stack-index stack))) (defmethod stack-emptyp (stack) nil) ;;; Empty state (defmethod stack-pop :filter :state ((stack (eql 'empty))) (error "Stack is empty.")) (defmethod stack-emptyp :filter :state ((stack (eql 'empty))) t) ;;; Full state (defmethod stack-push :filter :state ((stack (eql 'full)) value) (error "Stack is full.")) Note that we used a derived state function here, that determines the state of the stack based on some of its other properties. Since filter functions can be any functions, we could also use the reader of a slot as a filter function, and thus have the behavior of a filtered function depend on the explicit state of an object. Filtered functions can do a lot more: As already mentioned, they can use more than one filter; filter functions can see all the arguments a generic function receives; and filters can be guarded, which means that methods that use a particular filter may be completely ignored if the arguments don't fulfil a certain predicate. You can read the paper "Filtered Dispatch" at http://p-cos.net/documents/filtered-dispatch.pdf that I co-authored with Charlotte Herzeel, Jorge Vallejos and Theo D'Hondt for a more thorough introduction, background information and semantics, and which also includes an extensible metacircular Lisp interpreter as an example, based on implementing EVAL as a filtered function. Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ closer-announce mailing list closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Mon Dec 14 08:36:11 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NKB5u-0007bf-N6 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:11 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NKB5m-0007aR-Rl; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:03 -0500 Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1NKB5i-0007Ax-Ak for closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:01 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFbCJUuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADWGoQrBA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2009 14:35:02 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819FC590060 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guO2CxBXjmym for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from soft64.vub.ac.be (soft64.vub.ac.be [134.184.43.164]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE6E59005D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:35:01 +0100 Message-Id: <93F3A5D1-42B0-4A60-A13E-541908BEF79F(a)p-cos.net> To: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium ============= <http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org> May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal Important Dates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29, 2010* + Author Notification: March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 2010* [...] Content analysis details: (-104.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium ============= <http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org> May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal Important Dates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29, 2010* + Author Notification: March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 2010* [...] Content analysis details: (-104.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 3rd European Lisp Symposium ============= <http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org> May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal Important Dates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29, 2010* + Author Notification: March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 2010* [...] Content analysis details: (-104.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] [CfP] ELS 2010 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:36:11 -0000 3rd European Lisp Symposium ============= <http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org> May 6-7, 2010, Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal Important Dates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Submission Deadline: *January 29, 2010* + Author Notification: March 1, 2010 + Final Paper Due: March 26, 2010 + Symposium: *May 6-7, 2010* We hope, as in previous years, to invite authors of accepted research contributions to submit an extended version of their papers to a special issue of the Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS). Scope ~~~~~~ The purpose of the European Lisp Symposium is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of all aspects of design, implementation and application of any of the Lisp dialects. We encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate. The European Lisp Symposium 2010 invites high quality papers about novel research results, insights and lessons learned from practical applications, and educational perspectives, all involving Lisp dialects, including Common Lisp, Scheme, Emacs Lisp, AutoLisp, ISLISP, Dylan, Clojure, and so on. Topics include, but are not limited to: + Language design and implementation + Language integration, interoperation and deployment + Development methodologies, support and environments + Reflection, protocols and meta-level architectures + Lisp in Education + Parallel, distributed and scientific computing + Large and ultra-large-scale systems + Hardware, virtual machine and embedded applications + Domain-oriented programming + Lisp pearls + Experience reports and case studies We invite submissions (through EasyChair) in two categories: original contributions and tutorials. * Original contributions should neither have been published previously nor be under review in any other refereed events or publication. Research papers should describe work that advances the current state of the art, or presents old results from a new perspective. Experience papers should be of broad interest and should describe insights gained from substantive practical applications. The programme committee will evaluate each contributed paper based on its relevance, significance, clarity, and originality. * Tutorial submissions should be extended abstracts of up to four pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest for at least 90 minutes and up to 180 minutes. The programme committee will evaluate tutorial proposals based on the likely interest in the topic matter, the clarity of the presentation in the extended abstract, and the scope for interactive participation. The tutorials will run during the symposium on May 6, 2010. Programme Chair ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Christophe Rhodes, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Local Chair ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Antonio Leitao, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal Programme Committee ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + Marco Antoniotti, Universita Milano Bicocca, Italy + Giuseppe Attardi, Universita di Pisa, Italy + Pascal Costanza, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium + Irene Anne Durand, Universite Bordeaux I, France + Marc Feeley, Universite de Montreal, Canada + Ron Garret, Amalgamated Widgets Unlimited, USA + Gregor Kiczales, University of British Columbia, Canada + Nick Levine, Ravenbrook Ltd, UK + Scott McKay, ITA Software, Inc., USA + Peter Norvig, Google Inc., USA + Kent Pitman, PTC, USA + Christian Queinnec, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, France + Robert Strandh, Universite Bordeaux I, France + Didier Verna, EPITA Research and Development Laboratory, France + Barry Wilkes, Citi, UK + Taiichi Yuasa, Kyoto University, Japan -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ closer-announce mailing list closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Mon Dec 21 20:41:35 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NMtkk-0000aZ-NY for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:34 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NMtkb-0000aL-UE for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:26 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NMtkY-0000aE-R4 for rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:41:24 -0500 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so3910325bwz.2 for <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.160.131 with SMTP id n3mr611512bkx.122.1261444470358; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:14:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:14:30 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5e9be561ba26b752 Message-ID: <b56421a00912211714p753da36ds1cbe6e5193194bd4(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses Load as a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help, but essentially this "fix" is against your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found, right? Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences with RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm certainly not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses Load as a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help, but essentially this "fix" is against your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found, right? Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences with RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm certainly not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>, General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses Load as a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help, but essentially this "fix" is against your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found, right? Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences with RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm certainly not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.1 (Was: Could not load file or assembly error) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:41:35 -0000 I have now released a new version 0.13.1 which uses Load as a fallback (I had the same idea initially) and also exports do-rdnzl-collection. Raymond, thanks again for your help, but essentially this "fix" is against your original idea to catch errors early if an assembly isn't found, right? Do you have a better idea? (And good to hear about your experiences with RDNZL. I don't know of many users who deploy RDNZL "in earnest" - I'm certainly not one of them - but I'm always happy to hear about it.) Seth, thanks for the report. Cheers, Edi. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I just checked, and it does not appear that I used gacutil to register > rdnzl.dll. > > I tried running the messagebox example, using rdnzl 0.12.2 and 0.13. > 0.12.2 works, 0.13 does not. If I modify import.lisp so that > load-assembly uses the old code (with LoadWithPartialName), the > example works. Likewise if I change the code to try > LoadWithPartialName first, with Load (as used in 0.13) as a fallback. > The fallback probably won't help in the loading, but may be useful for > error trapping/reporting. > > Sorry about this - I will remember to test the demo programs as well > as my own code the next time... > > If you end up doing a new version instead of a rollback, it would be > good to have do-rdnzl-collection exported - it is implemented and > documented, but not exported (exactly as it was in the patch i sent, > so this, too, is my fault; again, sorry.) > > On a more positive note: I'm using rdnzl for feeding documents into a > search engine, and rdnzl works just great for me - good performance, > and no sign of any memory leaks - and also reasonably easy to get > working. Thanks again for allowing me to do (almost) Microsoft-free > programming under Windows :-) > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Could be due to the patch, but I think you may have to explicitly >> register rdnzl.ddl (using gacutil)? I seem to remember that I had to >> do that on Win7. I'll take a look on my Win7 installation. >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: >>> Hi Raymond, >>> >>> I think this is due to your recent patch. �Isn't this supposed to work anymore? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Edi. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Seth Burleigh <seth(a)tewebs.com> wrote: >>>> Im attempting to get this to work on windows 7. I have .net 3.5 installed >>>> but when I try this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> (defpackage :rdnzl-test (:use :cl :rdnzl)) >>>> >>>> (in-package :rdnzl-test) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> (enable-rdnzl-syntax) >>>> >>>> (import-types "System.Windows.Forms" >>>> >>>> �� "MessageBox" "MessageBoxButtons" "DialogResult") >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I get the error >>>> >>>> .NET error (System.IO.FileNotFoundException): Could not load file or >>>> assembly 'System.Windows.Forms' or one of its dependencies. The system >>>> cannot find the file specified. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Im pretty new to all of this, though im guessing this has something to do >>>> >>>> with setting environmental vars or something. But since you know the library >>>> >>>> I figure you�ll probably know the solution. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Looking forward to getting this to work! Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rdnzl-devel mailing list >>>> rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net >>>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ rdnzl-announce mailing list rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Dec 22 15:21:47 2009 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NNBEp-0003fd-4M for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:47 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NNBEj-0003fM-CA for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:41 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NNBEg-0003fA-Vg; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:21:39 -0500 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so4433660bwz.2 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:21:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.32.204 with SMTP id e12mr6189337bkd.51.1261513292253; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:21:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:21:32 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5a27e73393b02961 Message-ID: <b56421a00912221221n5fe8fc75r93ddda306f3ba67b(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo, I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like > > (or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo, I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like > > (or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>, General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo, I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like > > (or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > (let (..) > [Load ...]) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.2 (Was: New release 0.13.1) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:21:47 -0000 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sooo, I think that maybe import-assembly should do something like > > (or [LoadWithPartialName ...] > � �(let (..) > � � � [Load ...]) Yes, that's of course better. I should have thought of that myself... I made a new release with this change. Thanks and Happy Holidays, Edi. _______________________________________________ rdnzl-announce mailing list rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Jan 08 07:22:29 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NTDrJ-00081Y-Dp for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:29 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NTDr3-0007xn-8I for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:13 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NTDqt-0007vp-0R for tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:22:03 -0500 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so12241246bwz.2 for <tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:21:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.15.146 with SMTP id k18mr6471039bka.197.1262951683249; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:54:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:54:43 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 24c6b268f2a3ff51 Message-ID: <b56421a01001080354m4f6ddaf9yd055e922fbf0822c(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV <tbnl-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As pre-announced in December, Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out. Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches, suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year, Edi. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As pre-announced in December, Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out. Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches, suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year, Edi. tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As pre-announced in December, Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out. Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches, suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year, Edi. tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] New Hunchentoot release 1.1.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:22:29 -0000 As pre-announced in December, Hunchentoot 1.1.0 is now out. Lots of changes, see documentation. Thanks to all who sent patches, suggestions, or bug reports. Happy New Year, Edi. _______________________________________________ tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed Jan 20 08:37:33 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NXakX-00021T-JE for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:33 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <closer-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NXakR-000219-9o; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:27 -0500 Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1NXakO-000213-Nq for closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:37:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFmKVkuGuCsB/2dsb2JhbADXe4Q2BA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2010 14:37:18 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC3590060 for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wYAVHD7HO-8D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from soft64.vub.ac.be (soft64.vub.ac.be [134.184.43.164]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D86459005D for <closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0100 Message-Id: <D5C0F55B-CA99-4725-A4FC-FF5D22AEB210(a)p-cos.net> To: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Spam-Score: -103.2 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61, which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well, provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2558] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61, which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well, provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61, which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well, provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [164.15.128.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [closer-announce] Closer to MOP and ContextL: Support for LispWorks 6.0. X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:37:34 -0000 Hello, I have just released Closer to MOP 0.61 and ContextL 0.61, which both add support for LispWorks 6.0. The other Closer libraries will work in LispWorks 6.0 as well, provided you use 0.61 of Closer to MOP as a basis. Enjoy, Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ closer-announce mailing list closer-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Feb 21 08:09:51 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NjBZG-0000Dw-G8 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:09:50 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NjBWN-0008K8-0s for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:06:51 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1NjBTn-0007At-5W; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:04:15 -0500 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so1066965bwz.2 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:04:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.4.209 with SMTP id 17mr1225211bks.175.1266757444119; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:04:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda(a)mail.gmail.com> References: <75b4567b0911151829u4fd9358bufff4bd7c482cd849(a)mail.gmail.com> <b56421a00911152306u36ab78b6kfef09f449269016f(a)mail.gmail.com> <1266437462.7337.3.camel@mhflaptop01> <b56421a01002180235xeab0a0tc82d0555a9da928f(a)mail.gmail.com> <1266489921.7418.8.camel@mhflaptop01> <b56421a01002180252r393c4b49g7a234a8347883f98(a)mail.gmail.com> <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda(a)mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:04:03 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9166f2dc73f289a3 Message-ID: <b56421a01002210504n2e93d675p41f485fbeeb5e512(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: Matthew Curry <mjcurry(a)gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Edi, > > Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) > renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, yes, the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp >>>> > seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>> http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> >>> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/util.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A cl-webdav/doc >>> A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A cl-webdav/doc/dav.png >>> A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Edi, > > Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) > renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, yes, the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp >>>> > seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>> http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> >>> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/util.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A cl-webdav/doc >>> A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A cl-webdav/doc/dav.png >>> A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV <tbnl-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Edi, > > Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) > renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). One > of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. I just >> tried to clean up the mess. Please check if it works now. If you're >> OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. (Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, yes, the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp >>>> > seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>> http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> >>> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> A cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/util.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A cl-webdav/doc >>> A cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A cl-webdav/doc/dav.png >>> A cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] [hunchentoot-devel] PATCH: Some minor fixes for cl-webdav under hunchentoot 1.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:09:51 -0000 Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry <mjcurry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Edi, > > Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) > renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). �One > of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. �patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: >> I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. �I just >> tried to clean up the mess. �Please check if it works now. �If you're >> OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. �(Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, yes, the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes <rm(a)seid-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp >>>> > seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>> http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> >>> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> A � �cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/util.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A � �cl-webdav/doc/dav.png >>> A � �cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/specials.lisp >>> A � �cl-webdav/cl-webdav.asd >>> A � �cl-webdav/file-resources.lisp >>> Checked out revision 4511. >>> ralf@mhflaptop01:/tmp$ grep content-type cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> � � �(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" � � � � � � � � � � �<---- What happend to the patch? >>> � � �(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" >>> � � �(setf (content-type) (resource-content-type resource)) >>> �(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" >>> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �(content-type) nil) >>> >>> >>> Something seems utterly strange here. BTW, that svn url is the one used >>> in bknr's "ediware" svn repository - is this out of date? >>> >>> Cheers RalfD >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tbnl-devel site list >> tbnl-devel(a)common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel >> > _______________________________________________ tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sat Feb 27 14:09:17 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NlS2O-0003CX-NA for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:16 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1NlS2J-0003CH-44; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:11 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f214.google.com ([209.85.220.214]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <vsedach(a)gmail.com>) id 1NlS2G-0003Bx-Um for parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:09:09 -0500 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1200586fxm.2 for <parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:09:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.167.66 with SMTP id f2mr200217hbe.16.1267296319068; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:45:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:45:19 -0500 Message-ID: <c07e645b1002271045q3a1e1d9dr3563aa085a6a861e(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach(a)gmail.com> To: parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version 2.1). Enjoy! [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version 2.1). Enjoy! [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version 2.1). Enjoy! [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript version X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:09:17 -0000 Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now been changed to a <major>.<minor> format (the new release is version 2.1). Enjoy! Vladimir _______________________________________________ parenscript-announce mailing list parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue May 18 07:21:42 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OEKrm-0007Kb-9L for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:42 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <rdnzl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OEKrg-0007KM-Vb for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:37 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OEKrf-0007KB-4x for rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:21:35 -0400 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so943030fxm.10 for <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.23.15 with SMTP id p15mr14983bkb.115.1274180373011; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 03:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:59:32 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tOacl51J9bwzhfYf65CEkinVNvM Message-ID: <AANLkTimiSAc5umnT2P9vEEyMg9xnTKrEgJ6eEDSYcJkl(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list about RDNZL <rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ugh, I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ugh, I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: rdnzl-announce <rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ugh, I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [rdnzl-announce] New release 0.13.3 (Was: Patch: bug fix for do-rdnzl-collection) X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:21:42 -0000 Ugh, I finally managed to update RDNZL with your patch and released 0.13.3. Sorry for the long delay. Edi. On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > Hi Raymond, > > Thanks for the patch. �I'll be out of town for about a week and will > take care of this when I'm back. �Please remind me if I don't... :) > > Edi. > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Raymond Wiker <rwiker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> The attached patch fixes a bug in do-rdnzl-collection. Without this >> patch, do-rdnzl-collection would stop processing after a collection >> member that evaluated to nil. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rdnzl-devel mailing list >> rdnzl-devel(a)common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-devel >> >> > _______________________________________________ rdnzl-announce mailing list rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed May 19 11:40:14 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OElNV-00063Q-M9 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OElNP-000630-OC; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OElNL-0005vD-8S; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:03 -0400 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2110616ewy.10 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:39:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.50.13 with SMTP id c13mr6833493muk.63.1274282213345; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:16:53 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SWwPPEtMLXHEyP4y5AqxfRWkL60 Message-ID: <AANLkTilOgQ6EoRm3nwzx0bqrNSrk7UbcgstkqrhYS8qN(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog below, thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0 2010-05-19 Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https through a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a request through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method to render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on Lotus webservers) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog below, thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0 2010-05-19 Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https through a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a request through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method to render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on Lotus webservers) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog below, thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0 2010-05-19 Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https through a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a request through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method to render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on Lotus webservers) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New version 1.2.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:40:14 -0000 Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. ChangeLog below, thanks to anyone who sent patches or bug reports. Edi. Version 1.2.0 2010-05-19 Introduced *REMOVE-DUPLICATE-COOKIES-P* (Ryan Davis) Enabled https through a proxy (Bill St. Clair and Dave Lambert) Bugfix for redirect of a request through a proxy (Bill St. Clair) Export PARSE-COOKIE-DATE Safer method to render URIs Allowed for GET/POST parameters without a value (seen on Lotus webservers) _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed May 19 11:49:52 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OElWp-0007Va-W7 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:52 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OElWj-0007UR-Ij; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OElWg-0007Tt-51; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:49:43 -0400 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2116117ewy.10 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:49:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.174.30 with SMTP id w30mr6824708mue.57.1274282703839; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:25:03 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9qN7EZrPBTxiCDHiVlFrRZoJClg Message-ID: <AANLkTikSPoGyHBLQ9HbkEE0eD1bmOpfsa14RA5a3uY34(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And, again on weitz.de, there's also a new release of Chunga. Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And, again on weitz.de, there's also a new release of Chunga. Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly) drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And, again on weitz.de, there's also a new release of Chunga. Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly) drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New Chunga version 1.1.1 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:49:52 -0000 And, again on weitz.de, there's also a new release of Chunga. Version 1.1.1 2010-05-19 Read quoted cookie values (Red Daly) _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed May 19 15:42:08 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OEp9c-0007LA-8R for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:42:08 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OEp9P-0007Ks-V9; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:41:56 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OEp9M-0007KY-Tl; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:41:53 -0400 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so2738071fxm.10 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:41:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.80.16 with SMTP id d16mr828465mub.53.1274298105653; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.193 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 21:41:45 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JKay_czLiHZaGLmhudeS-xcbxEc Message-ID: <AANLkTimGMjDJSgIHx16socar5pd_BJWIuCnDTk-5Ttdx(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yeah, sorry, I should have been more careful. At least this was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yeah, sorry, I should have been more careful. At least this was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yeah, sorry, I should have been more careful. At least this was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :) [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New version 1.2.1 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:42:08 -0000 Yeah, sorry, I should have been more careful. At least this was reported by three persons in a couple of minutes which gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling that there are enough users to catch mistakes... :) Thanks. Bugfix release online. Edi. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Zach Beane <xach(a)xach.com> wrote: > Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> writes: > >> Available from http://weitz.de/ as usual. �ChangeLog below, thanks to >> anyone who sent patches or bug reports. > > This version does not compile for me; make-ssl-stream in util.lisp has > an extra paren at the end of line 334. > > Zach > > _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sat Jul 10 06:30:08 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OXXJv-0001Nd-RX for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:30:08 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OXXJb-0001NR-WF; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:29:48 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OXXJP-0001N9-1n; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:29:37 -0400 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1568299bwz.10 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:29:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.179.19 with SMTP id bo19mr8127373bkb.209.1278756371319; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.100.212 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:06:11 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: n8x_dY7aRZMgIHH5vU9z7N-y_BU Message-ID: <AANLkTinds5BBg0pxUhKuoUnGD9F8IuiD6JAA5jJXtA2-(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net>, General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This is a bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This is a bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This is a bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New Drakma release 1.2.2 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:30:08 -0000 There's a new release of Drakma out at weitz.de. This is a bugfix release. ChangeLog: http://weitz.de/drakma/CHANGELOG.txt _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Thu Aug 05 16:02:33 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Oh6e7-0000iV-RN for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:32 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <drakma-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Oh6dz-0000iA-R4; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:24 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f51.google.com ([209.85.161.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1Oh6dv-0000hW-Ix; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:02:20 -0400 Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so4586512fxm.10 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.223 with SMTP id d31mr7418165bks.146.1281036768699; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.133 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:32:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qKrZqSYWsFZCqDbU58dKqWS_cp0 Message-ID: <AANLkTikoiY3dT825ib=YqquUQwBS8gZoETzXyGHEcPRq(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Drakma and Chunga <drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to re-raise the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with > *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*. > But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the > mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is > highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is, that SET-DIFFERENCE and > UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still remains in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > > CL-USER> (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* > CL-USER> (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*) > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think, that this is a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example, > SET-DIFFERENCE in this case will constantly return the first set (see > below), so either the code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > > CL-USER> (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should also be fixed, especially, since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards, > Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list > drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net > [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to re-raise the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with > *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*. > But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the > mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is > highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is, that SET-DIFFERENCE and > UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still remains in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > > CL-USER> (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* > CL-USER> (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*) > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think, that this is a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example, > SET-DIFFERENCE in this case will constantly return the first set (see > below), so either the code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > > CL-USER> (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should also be fixed, especially, since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards, > Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list > drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net > [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: drakma-announce <drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to re-raise the topic of duplicate cookies. I've had this issue with > the older version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with > *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*. > But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the > mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is > highlighted in the attached diff. The problem is, that SET-DIFFERENCE and > UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still remains in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > > CL-USER> (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* > CL-USER> (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > *cookies*) > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think, that this is a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example, > SET-DIFFERENCE in this case will constantly return the first set (see > below), so either the code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > > CL-USER> (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com> > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should also be fixed, especially, since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards, > Vsevolod > > > drakma-devel mailing list > drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net > [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [drakma-announce] New release 1.2.3 [Was: duplicate cookies problem with proposed patch] X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net Reply-To: edi(a)agharta.de List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:02:33 -0000 Thanks for the patch. I'm back from vacation now and I've just released 1.2.3 which fixes this. Edi. On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Vsevolod Dyomkin <vseloved(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to re-raise the topic of duplicate cookies.� I've had this issue with > the older version of Drakma (1.1.0) and was unaware of the patch with > *remove-duplicate-cookies-p*. > But investigating the problem (before I've read the discussion in the > mailing list), I've encountered it's cause in the source code, that is > highlighted in the attached diff.� The problem is, that SET-DIFFERENCE and > UNION are not supplied COOKIE= tests in UPDATE-COOKIES. > > It still remains in the current version (1.2.2) and can be tested like this: > > CL-USER> (defvar *cookies* (make-instance 'drakma:cookie-jar)) > *COOKIES* > CL-USER> (drakma::update-cookies (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > �� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name > "lang" :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > �� *cookies*) > #<DRAKMA:COOKIE-JAR (with 2 cookies) {B629521}> > > I think, that this is a bug, because without the TEST argument, for example, > SET-DIFFERENCE in this case will constantly return the first set (see > below), so either the code should be simplified or the test argument should > be added. > > CL-USER> (set-difference (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > �� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/")) > �� (list (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/") > �� (make-instance 'drakma:cookie :name "lang" > :value "en" :domain "site.com" :path "/"))) > (#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com> > �#<DRAKMA:COOKIE lang=en; path=/; domain=site.com>) > > So, I believe, that this part should also be fixed, especially, since > UPDATE-COOKIES is called alongside with GET-COOKIES. > > Best regards, > Vsevolod > > _______________________________________________ > drakma-devel mailing list > drakma-devel(a)common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-devel > > _______________________________________________ drakma-announce mailing list drakma-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/drakma-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Aug 24 03:48:48 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OnoFU-0007Y3-Dd for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:48 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tbnl-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1OnoFJ-0007Wj-2G for announcements(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:37 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <nhabedi(a)gmail.com>) id 1OnoFA-0007Wd-0u for tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:48:28 -0400 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so5137556iwn.10 for <tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:48:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.192.80 with SMTP id dp16mr8082164ibb.39.1282634766364; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.177.18 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:26:06 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YbfnFR59tap4uHfmpugXEwOyGWA Message-ID: <AANLkTi�MRrVG9NnZ+thmmhLEU3-yZi5Z4Pp7R22Zp5(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> To: General interest list for Hunchentoot and CL-WEBDAV <tbnl-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to actually > doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to actually > doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: tbnl-announce <tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to actually > doing it. Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] New release 1.1.1 [Was: usocket:timeout-errors and *catch-errors-p*] X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:48:49 -0000 On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > I was meaning to make a new release but didn't get around to actually > doing it. �Maybe I should just do it now... Version 1.1.1 of Hunchentoot is now available from http://weitz.de/. Edi. _______________________________________________ tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Oct 17 15:44:11 2010 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1P7Z9O-00047q-U5 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:44:11 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <parenscript-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1P7Z9B-00047S-IB; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:57 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <vsedach(a)gmail.com>) id 1P7Z99-00047I-Ei; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:56 -0400 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so151150bwz.10 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.69.200 with SMTP id a8mr3626053bkj.36.1287344633195; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.144 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:43:53 -0400 Message-ID: <AANLkTinDEuVmBVSh7WHNLRS_g6FgimQp4d7NjFgOXsi4(a)mail.gmail.com> From: Vladimir Sedach <vsedach(a)gmail.com> To: parenscript-devel <parenscript-devel(a)common-lisp.net>, parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release, 2.2. It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated. Implicit return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported unfixed bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make expressionization work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release, 2.2. It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated. Implicit return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported unfixed bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make expressionization work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release, 2.2. It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated. Implicit return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported unfixed bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make expressionization work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the way special forms work will need to change somewhat. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript release: 2.2 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Hello, I've decided to make a new Parenscript release, 2.2. It includes mostly fixes. A couple of things have been deprecated. Implicit return should hopefully work better since last release. All reported unfixed bugs will go into the next release. Thinking about how to make expressionization work properly, and the latest bug reported by Scott, I realized that the way special forms work will need to change somewhat. Starting with 2.2, there will no longer be packaged releases for ASDF-Install (it's not any extra work making them, I just want to encourage people to use Quicklisp). Vladimir _______________________________________________ parenscript-announce mailing list parenscript-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sat Feb 05 18:16:29 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1PlrMi-0003HY-Bp for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:29 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1PlrMW-0003H9-OY; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:16 -0500 Received: from smtp07.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.129] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1PlrMU-0003Gy-AO for clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:16:14 -0500 Received: from elcleaves ([90.18.79.218]) by mwinf5d14 with ME id 4NZn1g00H4icZ5W03NZoV1; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:33:49 +0100 From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net> To: clfswm-devel(a)common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net Organization: None Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:45:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87bp2qxfqi.fsf(a)common-lisp.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everybody, I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] Content analysis details: (-3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everybody, I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] Content analysis details: (-3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi everybody, I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1102 released. X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:16:29 -0000 Hi everybody, I'm very happy to announce a new CLFSWM release: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/clfswm-1102.tar.gz Since the last release, changes are mainly bugs fixes and internals improvements. There is also some new code in contrib: - keyb_fr.lisp to enable french keyboard layout - mpd.lisp to handle the mpd (Music Player Daemon) - xmms.lisp to handle xmms - reboot-halt.lisp a menu to reboot/halt the machine - osd.lisp the system I use to make On Screen Display in videos - server/ a client/server system to manage clfswm remotely or with scripts. And now, CLFSWM can run another window manager while running (this can be useful sometimes with some applications (for example java app)) The full ChangeLog is here: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ChangeLog As always, the main site is here: http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ And the clfswm trac is available here: http://trac.common-lisp.net/clfswm/ Have fun, Philippe _______________________________________________ clfswm-announce mailing list clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Feb 15 15:28:19 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1PpRVQ-0001XB-3n for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:28:19 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1PpRV1-0001Ww-JZ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:27:51 -0500 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1PpRUv-0001Wl-G2 for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:27:49 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgGAMpiWk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACXPo4bc7xchV4EjysM Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2011 20:44:34 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B22590554 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63PpanKQqqzq for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (205.27-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.27.205]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E1B5590542 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:33 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:32 +0100 Message-Id: <43DD627C-399B-4BF2-BCA2-8C6ED1729CA3(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 7. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 29, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 7. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 29, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 7. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 29, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 7 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:28:20 -0000 The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 7. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 29, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Software Languages Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Mar 29 18:36:36 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q4hWe-0007uC-C9 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:36 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q4hWN-0007tu-2P; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:22 -0400 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1Q4hWK-0007to-Qo for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUNANBckk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYUIYXhmp3vF2FagSQSgw Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2011 00:36:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03275905B0 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6tr8SBIz6gW9 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (180.155-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.155.180]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 525C8590542 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:36:09 +0200 Message-Id: <5AA04AEE-2F77-47DB-83BF-CFCBE180A845(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -103.8 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0186] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 7 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:36:37 -0000 The document "Clarification Proposal for CLHS Section 22.3" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/7/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Apr 01 13:14:30 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q5hvW-00040B-MU for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:30 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q5hvN-0003zp-9Z; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1Q5hvK-0003zc-GY; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:14:15 -0400 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so658474pzk.10 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.172.20 with SMTP id u20mr3315217wfe.14.1301678047966; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.149.61] (m228-146p.163.com [220.232.228.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2sm3151840wfd.8.2011.04.01.10.14.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 01:14:02 +0800 Message-Id: <5776C442-9D7A-4043-91A0-3899AFD48FB4(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -103.1 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP, and we have implemented too versions: the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful for those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink and most Linux distributions) [...] Content analysis details: (-103.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -103.1 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP, and we have implemented too versions: the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful for those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink and most Linux distributions) [...] Content analysis details: (-103.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -103.2 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP, and we have implemented too versions: the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful for those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink and most Linux distributions) [...] Content analysis details: (-103.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.1 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:14:31 -0000 Hello everyone, With permission from Erik Huelsmann, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.1 The major point in this release is the availability of UDP protocol support on GNU CLISP, and we have implemented too versions: the FFI version and the RAWSOCK verion. The FFI version will be useful for those who cannot use RAWSOCK (i.e. default installation on MacOS/Fink and most Linux distributions) There're also some important fixes since the 0.5.0 release, especially for SBCL. Major changes since 0.5.0: * New feature: [CLISP] UDP (Datagram) support based on FFI (Win/Mac/Linux), no RAWSOCK needed. * Enhancement: SOCKET-SERVER return a second value (socket) when calling in new-thread mode. * Enhancement: [CLISP] Full support of DNS helper functions (GET-HOST-BY-NAME, ...) added. * Enhancement: [CLISP] Better network error type detection based on OS error code. * Enhancement: [LispWorks] Better network error type detection based on OS error code. * Bugfix: Fixed wrong macro expansions of {IP|PORT}-{FROM|TO}-OCTET-BUFFER functions (since 0.4.0) * Bugfix: SOCKET-CONNECT didn't set CONNECTED-P for datagram usockets on most backends. * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixes for "SBCL/Win32: finalizer problem, etc", by Anton Kovalenko <anton(a)sw4me.com> * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixed SOCKET-SERVER (UDP) on SBCL due to a issue in SOCKET-CONNECT when HOST is NIL. * Bugfix: [SBCL] SOCKET-CONNECT's TIMEOUT argument now works as a "connection timeout", thanks to Nikodemus Siivola. * Bugfix: [CMUCL] Fixed SOCKET-SEND on unconnected usockets under Unicode version of CMUCL. * Bugfix: [CLISP] Fixed and confirmed UDP (Datagram) support (RAWSOCK version). We special thanks to: Anton Kovalenko <anton(a)sw4me.com> for his professional fix on the issue "SBCL/Win32: finalizer problem, etc" [1]. If you want to download this release, please check out http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ The API documentation page on the website is actually quite new: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, I hope more and more people use USOCKET as part of their Lisp applications, and any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. If you use USOCKET, please let us know what for. And, if there's any historical issue which haven't been solved, please feel free to remind me. And below is a roadmap for future USOCKET releases (ignore the order): * Add UDP (Datagram) support for Digitool MCL; * The DFFI version of ECL backend without calling C compilers; * New backend: Symbolics Lisp Machine (because ASDF support it now); * New backend: XCL (is it ready?!); * New backend: IOlib; * New API: SOCKET-OPTION for setting/getting various socket options. Let me know if you have other ideas... Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.usocket.devel/316 _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Apr 03 15:19:47 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q6Spv-0000TP-01 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:47 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Q6SpW-0000T2-NG; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:22 -0400 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1Q6SpP-0000Sv-Cw for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:19:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HACK8mE2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYYIx+d8AYhWsEkHIM Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2011 21:19:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E215905B0 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLvwKkZGueX9 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (71.99-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.99.71]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89B60590542 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:11 +0200 Message-Id: <152A1549-9064-41E4-89BC-C4A9FC2F3084(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -104.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 8. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on May 15, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 8. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on May 15, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 8. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on May 15, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 8 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:19:47 -0000 The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 8. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on May 15, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue May 10 13:56:34 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QJrAf-0003vy-KP for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:33 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QJrAT-0003vY-9R; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:21 -0400 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1QJrAN-0003vK-Oz for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:56:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoAIAP91yU2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYG41wd6dzn2GGDwSUCQ6KOQ Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 10 May 2011 19:56:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BA359056E for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQUp0jU4B494 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (240.53-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.53.240]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EDC590542 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:56:12 +0200 Message-Id: <69F1E683-30CE-4223-A1C9-C0AAFF2E4DEE(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -103.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4428] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:56:34 -0000 The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed May 11 09:26:51 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QK9RA-00075F-Lt for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:26:51 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QK9QH-00074Y-Ue; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:25:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f179.google.com ([74.125.83.179]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1QK9QC-00074O-Hv; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:25:52 -0400 Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so248299pvf.10 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.60.135 with SMTP id h7mr4540705pbr.457.1305120341714; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.149.61] ([42.99.128.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a20sm5520244pbu.59.2011.05.11.06.25.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:25:35 +0800 Message-Id: <34C9222A-DBC2-43BD-B73F-30B0A2C4587E(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -103.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, a new version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this release, the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL, CLISP; there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard, with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -103.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, a new version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this release, the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL, CLISP; there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard, with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -103.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, a new version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this release, the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL, CLISP; there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard, with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. [...] Content analysis details: (-103.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.2 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:26:51 -0000 Hello everyone, I'm pleased to release USOCKET 0.5.2, a new version of the universal socket library for Common Lisp. In this release, the core API function WAIT-FOR-INPUT was much improved on SBCL, ECL, CLISP; there're some other fixes for ABCL and LispWorks. I heard, with this release, Hunchentoot can run on ABCL now. Major changes since 0.5.1: * General: [SBCL] SOCKET-CONNECT's TIMEOUT argument was limited on non-Windows platforms. * Bugfix: [CLISP] WAIT-FOR-INPUT now functions right (with/without READY-ONLY), this made Hunchentoot working on CLISP. (Thanks to Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov(a)yandex.ru>) * Bugfix: [ABCL] Fix SOCKET-ACCEPT to follow the documented API so that when called without an :ELEMENT-TYPE argument. (Thanks to Mark Evenson, the ABCL developer) * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed SOCKET-ACCEPT (Windows only) on WAIT-FOR-INPUTed sockets. * Bugfix: [SBCL, ECL] Fixed wrongly STATE set/unset for WAIT-FOR-INPUT on Windows (report by Elliott Slaughter) * Enhancement: Additional NAME keyword argument for SOCKET-SERVER for setting the server thread name. * Enhancement: [ABCL] GET-ADDRESS now works with underlying IP6 addresses. * Enhancement: [CLISP] missing GET-LOCAL-* methods for STREAM-SERVER-USOCKET was now added. We give special thanks to: Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter(a)gmail.com> for his two bug reports on WAIT-FOR-INPUT (SBCL/Windows) with unit test code, and these code are now part of USOCKET-TEST. If you want to download this release, please checkout http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ The API documentation page is here: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, I hope more and more people use USOCKET as part of their Lisp applications, and any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. If you use USOCKET, please let us know what for. And, if there's any historical issue which haven't been solved, please feel free to remind me. And below is a roadmap for future USOCKET releases (ignore the order): * Add UDP (Datagram) support for Digitool MCL; * The DFFI version of ECL backend without calling C compilers; * New backends: Symbolics Lisp Machine, XCL and IOlib; * New API: SOCKET-OPTION for setting/getting various socket options (already exist in trunk (0.6)) Let me know if you have other ideas. Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed May 11 13:10:55 2011 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QKCw2-0007rV-KA for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:55 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[208.72.159.207]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QKCvs-0007r6-Mz; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:45 -0400 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1QKCvm-0007qt-PO for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:10:42 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGq5yk2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACmDHeIcL96hhAElAkOijw Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 11 May 2011 19:10:37 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7DB59056E; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSiUU64IB0MI; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (86.90-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.90.86]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E429590542; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=2GdVADkk1ENayta8CFDv0geNHGA(a)mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:30 +0200 Message-Id: <EF8E218B-13A8-4442-8C3A-AC6B4C2A76A5(a)p-cos.net> References: <69F1E683-30CE-4223-A1C9-C0AAFF2E4DEE(a)p-cos.net> <BANLkTi=2GdVADkk1ENayta8CFDv0geNHGA(a)mail.gmail.com> To: Drew Crampsie <drewc(a)tech.coop> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error, it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error, it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -104.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error, it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal [...] Content analysis details: (-104.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:10:55 -0000 Hi Drew, Thanks for catching this error, it was indeed a copy/paste issue. Best, Pascal On 10 May 2011, at 22:15, Drew Crampsie wrote: > Hey Pascal, > > I noticed the <title/> on the page still refers to CDR 8, probably a > cut/paste mishap. > > Cheers, > > drewc > > On 10 May 2011 10:56, Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> wrote: >> The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. >> >> -- >> Pascal Costanza >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdr-announce mailing list >> cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce >> >> _______________________________________________ >> announcements site list >> announcements(a)common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >> -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun May 15 13:26:16 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QLhtH-0001ey-WD for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:16 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1QLht4-0001ei-F1; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:02 -0700 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1QLhsy-0001eY-74 for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:00 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQHAJMp0E2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYD44Fd6hynhWGGQSUMg6KSA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A34B59056E for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPC4EKSNMkAA for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (154.93-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.93.154]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 693E3590542 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:52 +0200 Message-Id: <8C36770C-9333-4693-97C7-28ABD1D28DA9(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 8 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:26:16 -0000 The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Jun 26 07:09:00 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Qaq1D-0001MM-Q7 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:59 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Qaq10-0001M1-O3; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:47 -0700 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1Qaq0x-0001Lt-69 for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:45 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiwKAHc0B06GuCsB/2dsb2JhbABTmFuGZYgHd4h2oVCeJ4YwBJZjDosv Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE75905C3 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29NA0MaRlyIl for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (129.99-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.99.129]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6F55905BF for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:39 +0200 Message-Id: <7AEDFE72-AAFC-40B1-9616-B66FFAAD5859(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:09:00 -0000 The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Aug 12 23:16:33 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Qs7WL-0001R8-Pb for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:33 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Qs7W6-0001Qm-07; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:21 -0700 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1Qs7W2-0001Qd-ML; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:16 -0700 Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so3254873iyf.30 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh�I8F9xkCprA+Bdc92xrsD3OMoAZZc8LtlsBsIqMqI8=; b=no+DHUDA5tB4iVK5xU1clRW41HQkkq1lxokdcPLqi6QIHUdLS2RK/5B7yCD4BOq7e1 +WdUu9uidZlyiC1+y6k9RVKV5OuR5FRTXQNd7YxmOdKZQY5+I+NkvUhKaxktu1BA0D4B YvYcgAngLncSeG0qR82fNcu0lSn8sAM8YwCfgReceived: by 10.42.97.8 with SMTP id l8mr1776914icn.3.1313216167848; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ib5sm2730720icc.0.2011.08.12.23.16.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:15:54 +0800 Message-Id: <D58D498A-B521-46BD-BBE6-A8A8577A62BC(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.3 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:16:34 -0000 Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: * Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed SOCKET-LISTEN on vector addresses like #(0 0 0 0) * Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed WAIT-FOR-INPUT on passive sockets (stream-server-usocket) * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed using UDP in delivered applications (thanks to Camille Troillard and Martin Simmons, this is from the legacy LispWorks-UDP project). * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixed for "SBCL data flush problem", reported by Robert Brown and confirmed by Nikodemus Siivola. Special thanks to: Robert Brown <robert.brown(a)gmail.com> for his reporting and patching on "SBCL data flush problem". If you want to download this release, please checkout http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for new Quicklisp releases. The API documentation page is still here: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml Any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. P.S. Now I have a full-time Lisp job in China:) Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sat Oct 01 08:04:52 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1RA17U-0003Aj-O9 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:52 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1RA17B-0003AL-Pg; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:33 -0700 Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1RA179-0003A1-NY; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:32 -0700 Received: by ywn1 with SMTP id 1so2324246ywn.10 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=NY5s9KUW7GG0aeooYy1nO+pEeRW0eY/K4M+SlQ/UVDQ=; b=q9PGNbGkEWTsefk1fgo00zWMo8eY1Jn0CU2OVIisVXtfdD3tSzSpeH99PyjQGZXFt7 TKgVocNZRD+FMgWved55ZjmntBoRheES7oVQqcqVkzdg1IL5znUqYgrLpuBrRjV+Z58N +SuCcI+nDOLPB7/qdtdhwxujjX15uxWh01CqgReceived: by 10.68.19.100 with SMTP id d4mr66851426pbe.34.1317481465855; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lh6sm30811299pbb.12.2011.10.01.08.04.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:04:00 +0800 Message-Id: <A7A8DFBC-69CC-4BC1-9AA3-D73BC45F5005(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.4 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:04:53 -0000 SGksIENvbW1vbiBMaXNwZXJzCgpUaGlzIGlzIGEgbmV3IGN1bXVsYXRpdmUgdXBkYXRlIHJlbGVh c2UgZm9yIFVTT0NLRVQsIHZlcnNpb24gMC41LjQKCkNoYW5nZXMgaW4gdGhpcyB2ZXJzaW9uOgoK KiBCdWdmaXg6IFtFQ0xdIEZpeGVkIGZvciBFQ0wncyBNQUtFLUJVSUxEIGJ5IHJlbW92aW5nIHNv bWUgdW5lY2Vzc2FyeSBjb2RlIChyZXBvcnRlZCBieSBKdWFuIEpvc2UgR2FyY2lhLVJpcG9sbCwg dGhlIEVDTCBtYWludGFpbmVyKQoqIEJ1Z2ZpeDogW0FDTF0gRml4ZWQgZm9yIEFsbGVncm8gQ0wg bW9kZXJuIG1vZGUuIChieSBIYW5zIEiouWJuZXIpCiogQnVnZml4OiBbU0JDTF0gU09DS0VULUNP Tk5FQ1Qgb24gVENQIHdvbid0IGNhbGwgYmluZCgpIHdoZW4ga2V5d29yZCBhcmd1bWVudHMgTE9D QUwtSE9TVCBhbmQgTE9DQUwtUE9SVCBpcyBub3Qgc2V0LiAocmVwb3J0ZWQgYnkgUm9iZXJ0IEJy b3duKQoKU3BlY2lhbCB0aGFua3MgKGFnYWluKSB0bzoKCglSb2JlcnQgQnJvd24gPHJvYmVydC5i cm93bkBnbWFpbC5jb20+Cgpmb3IgaGlzIHJlcG9ydGluZyBhbmQgcGF0Y2hpbmcgb24gYSBiaWcg YnVnIGluIFNCQ0wncyBTT0NLRVQtQ09OTkVDVCBmdW5jdGlvbiwgd2hpY2ggaGF2ZSB1bm5lY2Vz c2FyeSBiaW5kKCkgY2FsbHMgcHJldmlvdXNseS4KCklmIHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIGRvd25sb2FkIHRo aXMgcmVsZWFzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGNoZWNrb3V0CgoJaHR0cDovL2NvbW1vbi1saXNwLm5ldC9wcm9q ZWN0L3Vzb2NrZXQvcmVsZWFzZXMvCgpvciBqdXN0IHdhaXQgZm9yIG5ldyBRdWlja2xpc3AgcmVs ZWFzZXMuCgpUaGUgQVBJIGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24gcGFnZSBpcyBzdGlsbCBoZXJlOgoKCWh0dHA6 Ly9jb21tb24tbGlzcC5uZXQvcHJvamVjdC91c29ja2V0L2FwaS1kb2NzLnNodG1sCgpBcyB1c3Vh bCwgYW55IGZlZWRiYWNrIC0gYnVncyBvciBodWdzIC0gaXMgZ3JlYXRseSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZCwK ClJlZ2FyZHMsCgpDaHVuIFRpYW4gKGJpbmdoZSkKR2xvcml0eSBTb2Z0d2FyZSBMdGQuCgpQLlMu IFdoYXQncyBuZXh0IGluIFVTT0NLRVQ/CgpJIHRoaW5rIGl0J3MgYSBlbmhhbmNlZCBFQ0wgYmFj a2VuZCB3aGljaCB3b3JrcyBpbiBpdHMgYnl0ZS1jb21waWxlci1vbmx5IG1vZGUuIEkgdGhpbmsg dGhpcyBtZWFucyBhbGwgaW5saW5lZCBDIGNvZGUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHJlcGxhY2VkIGJ5IEZGSSBj b2RlLCBqdXN0IGxpa2Ugd2hhdCBJJ3ZlIGRvbmUgaW4gTFcgYW5kIENMSVNQIGJhY2tlbmRzLiBJ J2xsIGxlYXJuIGhvdyB0byBkbyBpdCByaWdodCBmcm9tIEFTREYuCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZSBtYWlsaW5n IGxpc3QKdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZUBjb21tb24tbGlzcC5uZXQKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmNvbW1v bi1saXNwLm5ldC9jZ2ktYmluL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZQpfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwphbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRz IHNpdGUgbGlzdAphbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRzQGNvbW1vbi1saXNwLm5ldApodHRwOi8vY29tbW9uLWxp c3AubmV0L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50cw= >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Mon Feb 27 07:23:36 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1S22QK-0003P0-3j for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:36 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1S22Pw-0003O2-Eu; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:12 -0800 Received: from mail-pw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1S22Ps-0003N9-Aa; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:10 -0800 Received: by pbcxa12 with SMTP id xa12so3240502pbc.10 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=guUwyVsUIQIlN8EAw6J0uyxUfXbREnhKthLixgQjEaw=; b=GM8sCa/FeE/4KJE4uWZa3sjUJpUkxKWCIboYbcajPDo7sMlMq5/HaLeDSo095NmCmK G060gKitnBGD6cpOJuS2bzrKKW9CdLTgnOV14aPP6zgoMWBxlZNecPyOs5TvvyAeuUuM DdxVi+EP23jiIR1IO6ShTB9d21eHOS21JBekEReceived: by 10.68.219.130 with SMTP id po2mr35301315pbc.140.1330356182565; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.253.130] ([115.199.241.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id li19sm12955087pbb.17.2012.02.27.07.22.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:22:53 +0800 Message-Id: <3C19759E-75CC-4DE8-B5D7-465DB4E00383(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 DECEASED_NO_ML Dead not via mailing list X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.5 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:23:36 -0000 Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: * Enhancement: SOCKET-CONNECT argument :nodelay can now set to :if-supported (patch from Anton Vodonosov). * Enhancement: [server] adding *remote-host* *remote-port* to socket-server stream handler functions (suggested by Matthew Curry) * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed UDP support for LispWorks 6.1 (patch from Camille Troillard by Martin Simmons). * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Stop using hcl:add-special-free-action for reclaiming unused UDP socket fds to improve multi-threading stablity (suggested by Camille Troillard). * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed SOCKET-CONNECT on Windows, now LOCAL-PORT never have *auto-port* (0) as default value. Special thanks to LispWorks official, Martin Simmons <martin(a)lispworks.com> whom provided the patch for LispWorks 6.1 compatibility. (And with LispWorks 6.1 released with IPv6 support, now I'm seriously considering USOCKET should also start to support IPv6 in next major release) If you want to download this release, please check http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for next Quicklisp releases. The API documentation page was slightly updated for the new (:NODELAY :IF-SUPPORTED) support in SOCKET-CONNECT: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. (Due to my recent heavy and hard work on my local Lisp job -- porting a very big commercial Lisp application from single-threaded to multi-threaded model, I'm very sorry that I don't know enough time to release USOCKET 0.6.0 before the end of February, so I decide to release 0.5.5, the last 0.5.x series release. Once I've got my job stabilized again on mid next month, I'll start pushing more work on USOCKET, I promise) Best Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) Gensym Release Owner _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue May 22 13:42:22 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SWvuO-0002ap-Nk for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:42:22 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SWvtl-0002YY-Gu; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:45 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1SWvtb-0002Y7-SJ for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:37 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B59F38EFD for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139 Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382E17208C for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtXkzuQyGyiu for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.194.92 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-92-194-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.194.92]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B8BA172092 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:46 +0200 Message-Id: <D32CD4D1-9811-40CB-BA88-4F4F26D31F57(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:42:23 -0000 The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Jun 03 06:51:31 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SbBDP-0001nJ-47 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:51:31 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SbBCt-0001mn-Gy; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:59 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1SbBCU-0001ln-F6 for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:57 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C2A87164 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01617207E for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuxD0lZnSFae for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.187.187 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-187-187-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.187.187]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 889CD172077 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 Message-Id: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:51:31 -0000 The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Jun 10 06:32:05 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SdiFQ-0003VD-Jj for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:32:04 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SdiFB-0003UZ-4Y; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:49 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1SdiF6-0003U5-KO; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:45 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33B4037A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EEBA8093; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3oR0O7zyrzU; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.247.67 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-67-247-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.247.67]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3AB9A8079; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> In-Reply-To: <21391.1339130972(a)gemini.franz.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200 Message-Id: <7F5DDE5C-948F-4605-8638-59C2F13451F7(a)p-cos.net> References: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1(a)p-cos.net> <21391.1339130972(a)gemini.franz.com> To: smh(a)franz.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) Cc: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net, CDR Discussions <cdr-discuss(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:32:05 -0000 Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. But let me stress a few points directly related to your questions: - It is certainly possible to discuss a CDR after it has been finalized. - More specifically, it's also certainly possible to refine a CDR after it has been finalized. However, the particular CDR (with a specific CDR number) cannot be changed anymore. If you want to refine a finalized CDR, you have to submit a new one, which will then receive a new CDR number. New CDRs can claim to updates to existing CDRs. (For example, it is already the case that CDR 4 is a refinement of CDR 0, and the whole CDR process is currently based on CDR 4 rather than CDR 0.) - Whether a particular CDR is eventually accepted by the community or not is in the hands of the community, not in the hands of the CDR editors. CDR is only a repository for documents, not a body that can enforce or endorse standards. This was an intentional design decision, to avoid the need for CDR editors to judge the contents of CDR documents (which they don't), and to avoid legal implications. - There are three mailing lists associated with CDR: cdr-announce is for announcements, cdr-devel is for discussions about the CDR repository and process itself, and cdr-discuss is for discussions about specific CDRs. If you would like to continue a discussion about CDR itself, please do so on cdr-devel. Didier (the author of CDR 11) seems to be willing to discuss CDR 11 on cdr-discuss, so if you are interested in that, please discuss it there. (Authors are encouraged, but not required to discuss documents. Again, CDR is intentionally a light-weight process: Any requirements imposed on authors would need to be checked, and CDR is designed to require as few checks as possible. That's why documents don't even need to be discussed, because it would be hard to judge what would qualify as a "sufficient" amount of discussion. We believe that members of the community are mature enough to decide for themselves what constitutes a "good" CDR or not.) Again, thanks a lot for your interest. I hope this clarifies your questions. Please feel free to comment or discuss this further, if you think there is room for improvement. Best, Pascal P.S.: I personally believe that Duane Rettig's proposal for environment access would be an excellent candidate for a CDR. Franz Inc. probably has more extensions that would be good contributions. Please let us know if we can help with submitting CDR documents, in case you are interested. On 8 Jun 2012, at 06:49, Steve Haflich wrote: > Pascal et al. > > I'm confused, or perhaps only ignorant, about the process underlying the > CDR repository. Once a CDR becomes final after a very short time, there > seems to be no forum or machinery to discuss or refine it. While I find > myself sympathetic to at least some of the stated problems, none of the > stated solutions are fully acceptable -- there are glitches in the > specifications, or important situations missed, or incompatibilities > between proposed changes and the official sanctity of the CL package. > > Is there some forum for further discussion of "final" CDRs? Otherwise > the CDRs seem a rather profitless exercise. > > _______________________________________________ > cdr-announce mailing list > cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce -- Pascal Costanza The views expressed in this email are my own, and not those of my employer. _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Jul 08 07:51:21 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SnspV-0004Pu-FN for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:21 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SnspF-0004PL-OZ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:05 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1SnspD-0004PE-SJ for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:04 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1DF3B16A for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139 Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C30E172099 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgQm3oLVX+c8 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.210.186 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-186-210-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.210.186]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3454172074 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 Message-Id: <9046BB4E-4AEB-4731-86AA-344CFD3BC75A(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:51:21 -0000 The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Jul 15 10:20:02 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SqSUD-000268-SC for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:20:02 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1SqSTy-00024z-P9; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:47 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1SqSTt-00024h-Pj for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:45 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492DA3FFA8 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.141 Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1776A80C2 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLqh5GnJG5Nq for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.129.95 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-95-129-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.129.95]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A33EA80BB for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:46 +0200 Message-Id: <A218D51A-5457-48F6-9062-E308B0A78C04(a)p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:20:02 -0000 The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Fri Sep 21 15:20:15 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBa3-0003h2-2X for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:15 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBZz-0003gl-37; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:11 -0700 Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBZw-0003gS-UB for clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:09 -0700 Received: from minideb ([92.155.70.94]) by mwinf5d07 with ME id 1xpr1k004222d6c03xpr1r; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:52 +0200 From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net> To: clfswm-devel(a)common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net Organization: None Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: <878vc359mq.fsf(a)common-lisp.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1209 is out X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:20:15 -0000 Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr - Multi heads support out of the box (no more need for individual hack). There is some new key bindings to circulate through root (ie: screen). - New Expos� Mode which support infinite children (previously 26) and multiple roots. - Better X Errors handling. Also, there is some new modules in the contrib directory: - contrib/toolbar.lisp to display toolbars everywhere. They can be clickable, hidden on click or with pointer motion. - contrib/wallpaper.lisp to display different wallpaper on different screen. More information can be found at http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ As always, thanks a lot for any patch, feedback or request! Best regards and have fun, Philippe _______________________________________________ clfswm-announce mailing list clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Nov 20 12:24:10 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TauMb-0005uN-V5 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:24:10 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TauML-0005rn-Qb; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:53 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1TauMK-0005rS-4n for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:52 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D73897C for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:50 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.131 Received: from mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.131]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834DB17209C for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter11-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlweFnuq08C2 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.66.118 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-118-66-108-94.static.as47377.net [94.108.66.118]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A908172096 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Message-Id: <8727B47E-EBF1-46DB-9BAA-1E3284EB2D85(a)p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 To: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:24:10 -0000 The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sat Dec 08 00:56:11 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCh-0004Yp-DZ for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:11 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCc-0004YT-9F; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:06 -0800 Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCa-0004YI-7K for clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:05 -0800 Received: from minideb ([83.204.98.245]) by mwinf5d60 with ME id YwRk1k0085HfhKF03wRkhG; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:45 +0100 From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard(a)common-lisp.net> To: clfswm-devel(a)common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net Organization: None Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj7huf07.fsf(a)common-lisp.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1212 released X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:56:11 -0000 Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. Here is a small resume of the git log information: * load.lisp do no run CLFSWM by default. It build an executable lisp image and can download CLX and ASDF if needed (this will help (I hope) lisp newbies). * The ./configure as been replaced by a simple Makefile which ease the load of load.lisp (it search for available lisp implementations). * New .desktop files to ease the login manager integration. * Some bug fixes on multi heads monitors to add or remove monitors on the fly. Non xinerama configuration are correctly handled. * Add support for numeric keypad with numlock on. * Key bindings for main and second mode are shown in menu entry. * I've added an blank-window-mode in contrib/. This way, we can hide part of the screen with blank window. I'm pretty sure nobody except me will use it but it's very useful in school class to hide some part of the screen on interactive presentation with a video projector. I think this version is pretty clean. So I'll made more announcement about it ((fr.)comp.land.lisp and french slashdot equivalent). I don't know where I can make english announcement/presentation (slashdot doesn't seem the place). So if you like it, feel free to share your feeling about CLFSWM. This way, maybe it will show up again on Wikipedia :-) As always any feedback is very welcome. Have fun, Philippe _______________________________________________ clfswm-announce mailing list clfswm-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 07:59:45 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TntOS-0001Uv-NN for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1TntOM-0001Ua-1O; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:38 -0800 Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1TntOG-0001Tz-LQ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:36 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so3945236dak.0 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=HctMN/o85y2WcGNMxTdG5/pIg9bAjHZu5WrVciaF/wE=; b=L69i/VH7Bn2x5tRrP6jUDEUAAvMHdmstpQDX+dm+zP/amJuL/IgHw43nmNstYmTmdk Mxc3QPCIKmPkONApRtzRQdLgM2AwlTBGDlBowGHG0/epsKizFAQccERG0Unw21ot6nnT i75Eqp9sbp1C4hQZYF09/0s9m/DNIVliJACGOlU15LugbZ1gQSjqagyfhQ2zrmjruQLe fC73Vtm8zgQC55oQ1V0ALmz4+8kBimjFPzJK4jQHfAwQPvXSEN87rKCdTnD8y+bVR4Fe OrogVJfJyFnJ5dZ9UDfemd35o/vpyZ9eRqM6Nrz8NsNu/7wLlpF3D6UW2M279xSlo0zy 21gA= X-Received: by 10.68.235.40 with SMTP id uj8mr85573285pbc.98.1356537566534; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.253.103] ([125.120.14.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm16706582paz.36.2012.12.26.07.59.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:59:17 +0800 Message-Id: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======98727182=" X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:59:45 -0000 --=======98727182= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-273235943 --Apple-Mail-1-273235943 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: * New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options. * New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer. * New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now) * Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo) * Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants. * Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov) * Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments. For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options: * RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO) * REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server * BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later. (Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon) As usual, if you want to download this release, please check http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates. The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...): http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. P. S. Something currently still in progress: * New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide * New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport. * New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets. Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) USOCKET Team --Apple-Mail-1-273235943 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear Lispers,<div><br></div><div>We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release.</div><div><br></div><div>Changes in this release:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options.</div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer.</div><div>* New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants.</div><div>* Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov)</div><div>* Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments.</div></div><div><br></div><div>For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options:</div><div><br></div><div>* RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO)</div><div>* REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server</div><div>* BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client</div><div><br></div><div>For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later.</div><div><br></div><div>(Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon)</div><div><br></div><div>As usual, if you want to download this release, please check<br><br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span><a href="http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/">http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/</a><br><br>or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates.<br><br>The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...):<br><br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span><a href="http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml">http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml</a><br><br>As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>P. S. Something currently still in progress:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide</div><div>* New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport.</div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Chun Tian (binghe)</div><div>USOCKET Team</div><div><br></div></body></html> --Apple-Mail-1-273235943-- --=======98727182= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce --=======98727182= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements --=======98727182=-- >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 19:22:49 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1To43V-0003Lr-0f for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:49 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1To43I-0003LQ-Ox; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:40 -0800 Received: from mail-da0-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com>) id 1To43D-0003L8-Uh; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:35 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h15so4129591dan.23 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=+Gs0pHm70t8G1pcjQMHicEtLlndJjawPpdDI/L777mk=; b=sYxHG5HtNkGk56ExQ83iv0Gxq4TrroVGnXXriWlYJAIajG/W9OQ6gmLaF6sxx+ox9h adMcqAJOtr59Ho80o11OIeSkK8ef0EkZN18t3tRznqKqAHWDQUjZ6fBK1HEd4Qacr624 zb9NT+AV+aK0xWmGh/UOZxa+fhhTLQh0P+FziRVGB8dWeELjJBbSeq7xDSYsj2JHgxeq Gx1LF3dAe1otneNDSv4lELdc6ShmTEgmIk/tWfZwmn5ZxwTR9IzGvHXWYRmS5p9NU8kw YkrzeSyX+Kj42WdkIWHTzIIrxt4+EXhZTIoHyN8dRwvSj63hn/12LyvlOUYfiVQXEVC7 0ODQ= X-Received: by 10.68.223.135 with SMTP id qu7mr12148744pbc.134.1356578545732; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.82] ([220.191.186.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id is3sm16958083pbc.6.2012.12.26.19.22.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:22:21 +0800 Message-Id: <A7913E4C-98AE-48C7-88E3-F325AEE58A35(a)gmail.com> References: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F(a)gmail.com> To: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-BeenThere: usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel(a)common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 03:22:49 -0000 Sorry � suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. Il giorno 26/dic/2012, alle ore 23:59, Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > Dear Lispers, > > We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. > > Changes in this release: > > * New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket options. > * New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer. > * New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need for C compilers now) > * Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo) > * Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constants. > * Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov) > * Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments. > > For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options: > > * RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO) > * REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server > * BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client > > For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation later. > > (Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part soon) > > As usual, if you want to download this release, please check > > http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ > > or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates. > > The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...): > > http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml > > As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. > > P. S. Something currently still in progress: > > * New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not provide > * New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport. > * New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets. > > Regards, > > Chun Tian (binghe) > USOCKET Team > _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Tue Jan 01 11:52:22 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Tq7ss-0002ZR-N3 for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:22 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1Tq7sj-0002Yx-46; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:13 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1Tq7sd-0002Yh-EM for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:11 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6939C6E for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:52:06 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.134 Received: from mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.134]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2E5172067 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:52:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter4-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVWO8pnuy04E for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:51 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.37.119 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-119-37-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.37.119]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8AB8172080 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Message-Id: <C6054511-EB2E-4F3F-979E-56FA8F44874A(a)p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100 To: "cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 withdrawn X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:52:23 -0000 The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Feb 17 07:28:17 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1U76A5-0000dr-Cw for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:17 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1U769u-0000d0-5f; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:06 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1U769r-0000cn-MC for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:04 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4182442EB6 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.145]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C6A80C0 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:20 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter17-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrfxM1l7fZTW for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.39.50 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-50-39-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.39.50]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8B20A80B4 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Message-Id: <5467782F-5A53-4858-8720-0A2CFE26B741(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 To: "cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:28:17 -0000 The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net Sun Mar 31 10:04:25 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1UMLg9-0004V2-EF for cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:25 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces(a)common-lisp.net>) id 1UMLfw-0004UG-OV; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:12 -0700 Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc(a)p-cos.net>) id 1UMLfr-0004Tu-AR for cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:11 -0700 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1771F47B41C for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360B941C06B for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Ya+c89bOltn for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.19.151 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-151-19-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.19.151]) (Authenticated sender: pascal(a)p-cos.net) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A20FB41C060 for <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc(a)p-cos.net> Message-Id: <5229F700-C4E1-4AEC-8777-F596174AE77F(a)p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200 To: "cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 $1503$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements(a)common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces(a)common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian(a)common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian@common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request@common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:04:26 -0000 The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements

2 1

[cl-debian] Accepted libsigsegv 2.5-3 (source amd64)
by Luca Capello 26 Mar '09

26 Mar '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green <plugwash(a)p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI= =EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch
by Luca Capello 26 Mar '09

26 Mar '09

tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. Thank you, applied: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsigsegv.git;a=commitdiff;h=00cc… Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca

2 1

[cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 26 Mar '09

26 Mar '09

Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > severity 519920 normal Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Severity set to `normal' from `normal' > merge 517167 519920 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Merged 517167 519920. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server
by Luca Capello 26 Mar '09

26 Mar '09

reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: slime The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-swank one, reassigned. > Version: 1:20090217 This is not a proper Debian version, which is always in the form $UPSTREAM_VERSION-$DEBIAN_REVISION For the next time, can you please submit bugs using the reportbug tool, as explained in the following link? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting This also helps the environment in which you have experienced the bug, e.g. versions of other dependendent packages and so on. > Starting a new swank server with the following code > > (require 'asdf) This is not needed since ASDF is loaded by default on Debian Common Lisp implementations. > (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank) This works as expected. > ;Specifically, this line\/ What does this mean? > (swank:start-server :dont-close t) > > results in the following error: > > debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread #<THREAD > "initial thread" RUNNING {AA6A649}>: > odd number of &KEY arguments Are you sure that `start-server' is intended to be used from a CL implementation? The source code seems to disagree with this use: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun start-server (port-file &key (style *communication-style*) (dont-close *dont-close*) (coding-system *coding-system*)) "Start the server and write the listen port number to PORT-FILE. This is the entry point for Emacs." (setup-server 0 (lambda (port) (announce-server-port port-file port)) style dont-close (find-external-format-or-lose coding-system))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Leaving the rest of your mail for the slime-devel@ mailing list. > Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. > > restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): > 0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. > > (SWANK:START-SERVER :DONT-CLOSE)[:EXTERNAL] > > > A longer backtrace when trying to load the same code from stumpwm via > stumpwm-mode, though I think all relevant information is the same: > > > odd number of &KEY arguments0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE > (LAMBDA #) {B95CCAD}>)[:EXTERNAL] > 1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {B95CC59}>) > 2: (BACKTRACE-STRING) > 3: (ERR "~A")[:EXTERNAL] > 4: (EVAL-LINE "(swank:start-server :dont-close t)") > 5: (CALL-INTERACTIVELY > "eval" > #S(ARGUMENT-LINE > :STRING "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" > :START 39)) > 6: (EVAL-COMMAND "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" NIL) > 7: (HANDLE-STUMPWM-COMMANDS #<XLIB:WINDOW :0 67>) > 8: (HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL] > 9: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK)) > 10: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]509)) > 11: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK > #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {B77FDCB5}> > #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX > :NAME "CLX Event Lock" > :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING {B696571}> > :STATE 1)) > 12: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation > R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL] > 13: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP) > 14: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0") > 15: (STUMPWM ":0") > 16: ((LAMBDA ())) > 17: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP)) > > > I don't have any suggestions at the moment, though perhaps the > upstream slime will have a fix soon. It's possible that this is an > sbcl bug, but what research I'm able to do points me to slime/swank. > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux Sid, updated.

2 1

None
by Luk Claes 13 Mar '09

13 Mar '09

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#518021: marked as done (aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 13 Mar '09

13 Mar '09

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em(a)ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner(a)bugs.debian.org with problems

1 0

[cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20090217-2 (source all)
by Luca Capello 13 Mar '09

13 Mar '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU= =f29O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade
by Luca Capello 13 Mar '09

13 Mar '09

tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Updating SLIME in testing fails on configuration. See the aptitude > output attached to this mail. Please always set LANG=C when you provide logs, since it is difficult to parse foreign languages ;-) I can reproduce the bug on a clean cowbuilder chroot: first, I created it for lenny, then installed slime together with xemacs21 and emacs22 (no errors). After that I modified apt's sources.list to point to testing: ===== root@gismo:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release.gpg [197B] Get:2 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release [71.6kB] Get:3 http://cdn.debian.net testing/main Packages [5533kB] Fetched 5604kB in 11s (497kB/s) Reading package lists... Done root@gismo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade [...] The following packages will be upgraded: aptitude base-files bash binutils cl-swank cowdancer cpio cpp cpp-4.3 debconf debconf-i18n debianutils fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.3 gcc gcc-4.3 gcc-4.3-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip libc6 libc6-dev libdb4.6 libept0 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgmp3c2 libgnutls26 libgomp1 libice6 libmpfr1ldbl libncurses5 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libsepol1 libsm6 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.3-dev libtasn1-3 libxapian15 libxau6 libxaw7 mawk mktemp ncurses-base ncurses-bin pbuilder readline-common realpath sed slime tzdata 56 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.5MB/38.7MB of archives. After this operation, 3084kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y [...] ===== > Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el... > While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el: > !! error (("Required feature arc-mode was not provided")) >>>Error occurred processing slime.el: > Required feature arc-mode was not provided This is the problem, specific to xemacs21 and not emacs22. The problem is in slime.el at line 69: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (require 'overlay)) (require 'easymenu) (eval-when (compile) (require 'arc-mode) (require 'apropos) (require 'outline) (require 'etags)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This has already been reported upstream, see the discussion at http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2008-October/015633.html Quoting Helmut Heller from the thread above: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote: > * Steven E. Harris [2008-10-27 00:21+0100] writes: > >>> Byte-compilation doesn't work in XEmacs, though. >> >> In general, or as a result of this change? Before my last post, I was >> able to byte-compile slime.el when I commented out the `require' form, >> but I concede that I didn't test the result. > > It doesn't work because arc-mode.el in XEmacs provides 'archive-mode > instead of 'arc-mode. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Since on Debian we byte-compile emacsen files at installation, I do not know how to proceed here. Is not this a bug in XEmacs? I would say so and thus reassign the bug to xemacs21. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca

2 1

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
297
Older →

Jump to page: