- cl-debian@lists.common-lisp.net - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[cl-debian] debian/control: Architecture field
by Luca Capello 20 Sep '05

20 Sep '05

Hello all! I finally have some time to continue my work in debianizing CL packages and I'm finishing rfc2388 (bug #310665 [1]). But I have a little question to be completely sure of what I've understood. >From the Policy Manual: ===== 5.6.8 Architecture Depending on context and the control file used, the Architecture field can include the following sets of values: * A unique single word identifying a Debian machine architecture, see Architecture specification strings, Section 11.1. * all, which indicates an architecture-independent package. * any, which indicates a package available for building on any architecture. * source, which indicates a source package. In the main debian/control file in the source package, or in the source package control file .dsc, one may specify a list of architectures separated by spaces, or the special values any or all. Specifying any indicates that the source package isn't dependent on any particular architecture and should compile fine on any one. The produced binary package(s) will be specific to whatever the current build architecture is. ====== Now, rfc2388 doesn't produce any binary file, so am I correct if I assume that the Architecture: field is "all"? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca [1] http://bugs.debian.org/310665

2 1

[cl-debian] Bug#329125: cl-acl-compat: write-vector definition triggers package-lock exception
by Christian Lynbech 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Package: cl-acl-compat Version: 1.2.42+cvs.2005.08.05-4 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/common-lisp/source/acl-compat/acl-excl-common.lisp When loading acl-excl-common into CMUCL, a package lock exception is triggered on 'write-vector'. This is with CMUCL: ii cmucl 19b-release-20050726-5 but the bug has been there for some time. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cl-acl-compat depends on: ii cl-ppcre 1.2.11-1 Portable Regular Express Library f ii cl-puri 1.3.1.2-1 Common Lisp Portable URI Library ii common-lisp-controller 4.18 This is a Common Lisp source and c cl-acl-compat recommends no packages. -- no debconf information

1 0

[cl-debian] Processed: setting package to cltl, tagging 328855
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > package cltl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cltl > tags 328855 + pending Bug#328855: cltl: description contains language errors There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

1 0

[cl-debian] Anyone willing to package Cedilla?
by Juliusz Chroboczek 19 Sep '05

19 Sep '05

Hi, Could people please have a look at RFP 288769 and see whether they'd be willing to do the work? They'd be doing me a favour. For more details, please see http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/ Cedilla has been in SuSE Linux for years, so the code is expected to be fairly solid. On the other hand, you should expect to have some packaging problems, some of which might require upstream changes; in particular, the current version contains some autogenerated files which it might be better to generate at build time. Oh, and upstream is maintained using Darcs. Thanks for listening, Juliusz

4 13

[cl-debian] Bug#328855: cltl: description contains language errors
by Luca Capello 17 Sep '05

17 Sep '05

Package: cltl Severity: minor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm not an English native speaker, but I think there are at least 2 errors: double "the" and a grammatical one. Description: Common Lisp the Language, second edition, book (Pre-ANSI) This package installs the HTML version of Guy L. Steele book Common Lisp the Language, second edition. This book describes a snapshot of the Common Lisp language during the period which the the ANSI Common ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IMHO it should be "during the period the ANSI Common". Please fix this small problem, if I'm correct. Otherwise, feel free to safely close this bug. TIA. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDLFtcVAp7Xm10JmkRAo4yAJ4gxgIGXxgh2cer3SWGxNBdnReHXwCfX0hh FpQS+D4Oa9MLDLuc33+0CcU= =d+V3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#328633: marked as done (common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657?)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:58:30 +0200 with message-id <200509161758.32488.pvaneynd(a)debian.org> and subject line Bug#328633: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 14:04:24 +0000 >From micah(a)riseup.net Fri Sep 16 07:04:21 2005 Return-path: <micah(a)riseup.net> Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGGpB-0003tO-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574C6A31F7; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31018-38; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290BA31EF; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6D343A81F; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Micah Anderson <micah(a)riseup.net> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Subject: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team <team(a)security.debian.org> Message-Id: <20050916043641.D6D343A81F@pond> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 4.16 Severity: normal Tags: security Hi, I notice that in DSA-811-1[1] that common-lisp-controller has a fix for CAN-2005-2657 uploaded into stable, and the upload that is recorded as fixing this issue in unstable is for version 4.18[2]. However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on 8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect? Thanks, Micah 1. http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-811 2. "For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 4.18." -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --------------------------------------- Received: (at 328633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 15:58:35 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Fri Sep 16 08:58:35 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGIbj-0006X3-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:58:35 -0700 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C81CCFEE8; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:34 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: rfZuGBBvHihKPLShsi91MdyiAKw7l/NdD/YzDi7YdsTL 1126886313 Received: from sharrow (196-56.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.56.196]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D5A570360; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> To: Micah Anderson <micah(a)riseup.net>, 328633-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#328633: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:58:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050916043641.D6D343A81F@pond> In-Reply-To: <20050916043641.D6D343A81F@pond> Organization: Debian MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509161758.32488.pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Delivered-To: 328633-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Friday 16 September 2005 06:36, Micah Anderson wrote: > However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on > 8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the > fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect? Oeps. I was under the mistaken impression the security team would also upload the unstable version. I uploaded it now. Thanks for the report. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Accepted common-lisp-controller 4.18 (source all)
by Peter Van Eynde 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:56:54 +0200 Source: common-lisp-controller Binary: common-lisp-controller Architecture: source all Version: 4.18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Description: common-lisp-controller - This is a Common Lisp source and compiler manager Changes: common-lisp-controller (4.18) unstable; urgency=high . * From Kevin Rosenberg: it should be #o22, not #x22! Better fix for CAN-2005-2657 Files: 6db43a34b6987f1a8068b467d97fe198 587 devel optional common-lisp-controller_4.18.dsc 78bb36273060bd3e75da38b234a4d5ff 25321 devel optional common-lisp-controller_4.18.tar.gz 3168f3639d89680d85172098ee51ba31 24368 devel optional common-lisp-controller_4.18_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDG1KL11ldN0tyliURAg+7AJ9HFFsJ3AWkhy2tCMCZi1iWjmhNhQCgxopj ZBzkoCni7TC9QoI8yh7uhyo= =zvMl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: common-lisp-controller_4.18.dsc to pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_4.18.dsc common-lisp-controller_4.18.tar.gz to pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_4.18.tar.gz common-lisp-controller_4.18_all.deb to pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_4.18_all.deb

1 0

[cl-debian] Processed: setting package to common-lisp-controller, tagging 328490
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > package common-lisp-controller Ignoring bugs not assigned to: common-lisp-controller > tags 328490 + pending Bug#328490: sbcl: /var/cache/common-lisp-controller/root left on purge There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

1 0

[cl-debian] Processed: reassign 328490 to common-lisp-controller
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

Processing commands for control(a)bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > reassign 328490 common-lisp-controller Bug#328490: sbcl: /var/cache/common-lisp-controller/root left on purge Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `common-lisp-controller'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#328633: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657?
by Micah Anderson 16 Sep '05

16 Sep '05

Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 4.16 Severity: normal Tags: security Hi, I notice that in DSA-811-1[1] that common-lisp-controller has a fix for CAN-2005-2657 uploaded into stable, and the upload that is recorded as fixing this issue in unstable is for version 4.18[2]. However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on 8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect? Thanks, Micah 1. http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-811 2. "For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 4.18." -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

1 0