- cl-debian@lists.common-lisp.net - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[cl-debian] Bug#323130: cmucl: purging leaves /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp.core behind
by Lukasz Pankowski 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Package: cmucl Version: 19b-release-20050726-2 Severity: normal Hi, If you purge cmucl it leaves rather big (24M) /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp.core behind. Shell evidence: # apt-get remove --purge cmucl [...] Removing cmucl ... Purging configuration files for cmucl ... dpkg - warning: while removing cmucl, directory `/usr/lib/cmucl' not empty so not removed. # ls -sh /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp.core 24M /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp.core -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.16 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.57 Debian configuration management sy cmucl recommends no packages. -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: -- =*= Lukasz Pankowski =*=

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#319427: marked as done (Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 00:32:38 +0000 >From alerim(a)nerim.net Thu Jul 21 17:32:38 2005 Return-path: <alerim(a)nerim.net> Received: from smtp-105-friday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.nerim.net) [62.4.17.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvlSw-0003Cs-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:32:38 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (voltaire-104-1-28.net1.nerim.net [213.41.188.28]) by mallaury.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F7F4F3A0 for <submit(a)bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:32:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E03EA3.9030806(a)nerim.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:32:35 +0200 From: Alexis Rimbaud <alerim(a)nerim.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.1.41-1hoary Severity: normal Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the `inferior-lisp-program': --- ; compiling file "/usr/share/common-lisp/source/slime/swank-sbcl.lisp" (written 27 APR 2005 09:11:59 PM): debugger invoked on a SB-EXT:PACKAGE-LOCKED-ERROR in thread 30461: Lock on package SB-C violated when interning DEBUG-SOURCE-INFO. See also: The SBCL Manual, Node "Package Locks" Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): 0: [CONTINUE ] Ignore the package lock. 1: [IGNORE-ALL ] Ignore all package locks in the context of this operation. 2: [UNLOCK-PACKAGE] Unlock the package. 3: [ABORT ] Exit debugger, returning to top level. (SB-EXT:PACKAGE-LOCK-VIOLATION #<PACKAGE "SB-C">) 0] --- Thanks for help, Alexis. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-5-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages sbcl depends on: ii common-lisp-control 4.15hoary This is a Common Lisp source and c ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20ubuntu13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sbcl-common 1:0.9.1.41-1hoary Architecture independent files for -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 319427-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#282716: marked as done (cmucl: Excessive memory usage)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2004 22:52:57 +0000 >From roger(a)whinlatter.ukfsn.org Tue Nov 23 14:52:57 2004 Return-path: <roger(a)whinlatter.ukfsn.org> Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CWjWr-0005dt-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:52:57 -0800 Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39CFE6A8F; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:50:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04937-11; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:50:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org (unknown [80.41.120.178]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3EBE6A8C; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:50:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from roger by whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CWjWj-0003AT-51; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:52:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roger Leigh <rleigh(a)debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Subject: cmucl: Excessive memory usage X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:52:48 +0000 Message-Id: <E1CWjWj-0003AT-51(a)whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> Sender: Roger Leigh <roger(a)whinlatter.ukfsn.org> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: cmucl Version: 19a-release-20040728-9 Severity: normal cmucl uses a lot of virtual memory. For example, running /usr/bin/cmucl on my system with no arguments gives this line with top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S #C %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 10620 roger 15 -1 1284m 5044 24m S 0 0.8 1.0 0:00 cmucl It's using over 1 gigabyte of virtual memory! The system has 512 MiB of core memory and an extra 8 GiB swap space, giving 8.5 GiB total virtual memory. By default, the system has some resource limits specified in /etc/security/limits.conf * soft nproc 150 * hard nproc 200 * soft core 0 * hard core 20480 * hard maxlogins 15 * hard rss 100000 * soft priority 5 * soft stack 8192 * hard stack 8192 * soft as 524288 With the last "as" limit in place, cmucl won't run at all: $ cmucl mmap: Cannot allocate memory ensure_space: Failed to validate 268431360 bytes at 0x28000000 If the "as" limit is removed, cmucl will run just fine. So it seems the default value for allocation is way too large. If this is calculated at runtime, perhaps the calculation is broken? [I tried removing 6 GiB of swap and reinstalling to regenerate the core/memory dumps; this had no effect.] I'm afraid I'm not too familiar with Lisp: I installed cmucl to learn the language. I'll be more than happy to do any further testing, though. Regards, Roger # cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 515652 kB MemFree: 14332 kB Buffers: 32224 kB Cached: 210888 kB SwapCached: 28 kB Active: 368644 kB Inactive: 87892 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 515652 kB LowFree: 14332 kB SwapTotal: 8388544 kB SwapFree: 8388516 kB Dirty: 644 kB Writeback: 0 kB Mapped: 265688 kB Slab: 20260 kB Committed_AS: 836280 kB PageTables: 2544 kB VmallocTotal: 516040 kB VmallocUsed: 48388 kB VmallocChunk: 466884 kB -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.12 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf 1.4.40 Debian configuration management sy -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: --------------------------------------- Received: (at 282716-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#278137: marked as done (cmucl-docs missing HTML version of Design)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 01:38:46 +0000 >From lists(a)consulting.net.nz Sun Oct 24 18:38:46 2004 Return-path: <lists(a)consulting.net.nz> Received: from ip202-36-23-202.ip.splice.net.nz (ip202.36.23.202.ip.win.co.nz) [202.36.23.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CLtor-0004rp-00; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:38:46 -0700 Received: from ip202-36-23-202.ip.splice.net.nz [202.36.23.202]; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:38:23 +1300 Subject: cmucl-docs missing HTML version of Design From: Adam Warner <lists(a)consulting.net.nz> To: Debian BTS <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:38:12 +0000 Message-Id: <1098668292.2965.5.camel(a)main.consulting.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: cmucl-docs Version: 19a-release-20040728-9 Peter, I used to be able to read /usr/share/doc/cmucl-docs/design/design.html using a browser. Now the document only appears to exist as /usr/share/doc/cmucl-docs/design.pdf.gz Regards, Adam --------------------------------------- Received: (at 278137-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#220797: marked as done (cl-series: Does not add :SERIES-ANSI to *FEATURES* at the right time on LispWorks)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 18:20:04 +0000 >From ljosa(a)yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu Fri Nov 14 12:19:39 2003 Return-path: <ljosa(a)yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu> Received: from yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.68.226] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AKiXj-0005GE-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:19:39 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 15906) by yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu with local; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:19:38 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vebjorn Ljosa <vebjorn(a)ljosa.com> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Subject: cl-series: Does not add :SERIES-ANSI to *FEATURES* at the right time on LispWorks X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:19:38 -0800 Message-ID: <courier.3FB51CBA.00000D78(a)yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: cl-series Version: 1:2.2.7-1 Severity: important I am trying to use the CL-SERIES Debian package on LispWorks 4.2.7 for Linux. After (REQUIRE :SERIES), when trying to evaluate a simple expression like (LET ((HT (MAKE-HASH-TABLE))) HT), I get the error "Undefined function SERIES::SPECIAL-FORM-P called with arguments (MAKE-HASH-TABLE)." I believe that *FEATURES* does not contain :SERIES-ANSI when s-code.lisp is compiled; consequently, NOT-EXPR-LIKE-SPECIAL-FORM-P tries to use SPECIAL-FORM-P instead of (the ANSI compliant) SPECIAL-OPERATOR-P. I thought the following, from s-package.lisp, should work, but it doesn't: ;;; Note this is really too early, but we need it here #+(or draft-ansi-cl draft-ansi-cl-2 ansi-cl allegro cmu sbcl Genera Harlequin-Common-Lisp CLISP mcl) (cl:eval-when (load eval compile) (cl:pushnew ':series-ansi cl:*features*)) I am not 100% sure about this, but it seems that :SERIES-ANSI is added to *FEATURES* in the evaluation environment, but not in the startup environment. (Which I think is conforming behavior.) Thus, *FEATURES* contains :SERIES-ANSI while compiling s-package.lisp, but after the compilation is finished, *FEATURES* is what is was before s-package.lisp was compiled. This is not a problem with the Series package from Sourceforge because it uses mk-defsystem. MK:COMPILE-SYSTEM loads each file after compiling it, so s-package will be loaded before s-code is compiled. I am not sure what the right way to fix this is. Can ASDF be persuaded to load each file after compiling it, just like mk-defsystem? Thanks, Vebjorn -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux yamuna.cs.ucsb.edu 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages cl-series depends on: ii cl-asdf 1.79-1 Another System Definition Facility ii common-lisp-controller 3.76 This is a Common Lisp source and c -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 220797-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#212018: marked as done (clue fails to build on installation with cmucl)
by owner＠bugs.debian.org 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 with message-id <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> and subject line closing old non-relevant bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 18:47:46 +0000 >From bruce(a)cenderis.demon.co.uk Sun Sep 21 13:47:36 2003 Return-path: <bruce(a)cenderis.demon.co.uk> Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A19FA-0004zX-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:47:36 -0500 Received: from cenderis.demon.co.uk ([62.49.17.254] helo=localhost) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A19F9-0004nF-0W for submit(a)bugs.debian.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:35 +0100 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E05A17C719; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:34 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bruce Stephens <bruce(a)cenderis.demon.co.uk> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(a)bugs.debian.org> Subject: clue fails to build on installation with cmucl X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:47:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20030921184734.E05A17C719@localhost> Delivered-To: submit(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: clue Version: 20011231 Severity: normal I just installed cmucl and cmucl-source, and it appeared that cmucl-clx built correctly (I got no errors from that, anyway). And yet when I install clue, I get three emails from clc-build-daemon saying that clue, clio-examples and pictures failed to build: Hello This is the clc-build-daemon reporting a build failure. While recompiling package clue for compiler cmucl I got the error code 1 If you want to retry the compilation and possibly report this as a bug then please read /usr/share/doc/common-lisp-controller/REPORTING-BUGS The command to retry the recompilation is: clc-send-command --verbose remove clue cmucl ; echo returns: $? clc-send-command --verbose recompile clue cmucl ; echo returns: $? After this message I will append the last few lines of output. Thanks for your attention /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/cmucl.sh rebuilding... rebuilding clue ; Loading #p"/usr/share/common-lisp/systems/clue.system". ; Compilation unit aborted. ; Compilation unit aborted. Built Error: File-error in function COMMON-LISP::INTERNAL-LOAD: "modules:cmucl-clx-library" does not exist. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cenderis.demon.co.uk 2.4.22ms1 #1 Sat Aug 30 22:00:43 BST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages clue depends on: ii cmucl-source 18e-7 The CMUCL lisp sources ii common-lisp-controller 3.76 This is a Common Lisp source and c -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 212018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 20:14:49 +0000 >From pvaneynd(a)debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:14:49 2005 Return-path: <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4Osb-0007E9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:49 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE7CC9EE8; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: OZlkM6vpCDYfS282b9fScaMkqkCNR+RKODJi/n1KIsiy 1124050486 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (57.165-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.165.57]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528856F785; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FFA636.8050802(a)debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:14:46 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 220797-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 278137-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 282716-done(a)bugs.debian.org, 319427-done(a)bugs.debian.org Subject: closing old non-relevant bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 212018-done(a)bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello, I'm closing older bugs that litter the bts at the moment. 220797 is non-relevant because we don't do lispworks anymore ;-) 212018 is fixed in sarge 278137 I don't want to fix because the generation is brittle and depends on latex2html (a non-free package) 282716 because the memory system is unlikely to change any time soon 319427 because it is a ubuntu bug and should be fixed if you use the people.debian.org/~pvaneynd repository If you think this is unfair, please reopen and yell at me :-) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

1 0

[cl-debian] Bug#317533: found 317533 1:0.9.3.0-2
by Matt Kraai 14 Aug '05

14 Aug '05

found 317533 1:0.9.3.0-2 thanks Since both Paul Visscher and I can reproduce this bug with 1:0.9.3.0-2, I'm reopening this bug. -- Matt

3 3

[cl-debian] Accepted sbcl 1:0.9.3.36-1 (source i386 all)
by Peter Van Eynde 13 Aug '05

13 Aug '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:36:27 +0200 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.3.36-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd(a)debian.org> Description: sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL Changes: sbcl (1:0.9.3.36-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Correct /etc/sbclrc /etc/sbcl\.rc load order in manual page. * Correct syntax error in changelog * Corrected bash-ism in postinst * New upstream. * Drop threading support for sarge and hoary '24' distributions * Drop dead if running on 2.4 or without NTPL * Show stderr during building a core * sbcl-common replaces a file in sbcl Files: 891172183adf86976312fa49ebf628df 681 devel optional sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.dsc 855a57b6b57f725e0b67d1c9fb5d85c5 3761067 devel optional sbcl_0.9.3.36.orig.tar.gz 9cc894cdafe4045d57b479aa95e3bff8 16614 devel optional sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.diff.gz 4df5b24c1365bb5e0a310b9bb0e644d9 3902662 devel optional sbcl-common_0.9.3.36-1_all.deb 0f02225e486886793e09691218048a7d 8510028 devel optional sbcl_0.9.3.36-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC/i5411ldN0tyliURAg3QAJ94gUDDFkbFgWW5mUlQCgwqETyCSQCZAUF3 PYfJwdawNbsuRtMyLBXXQec= =60qq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: sbcl-common_0.9.3.36-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.3.36-1_all.deb sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.3.36-1.dsc sbcl_0.9.3.36-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.3.36-1_i386.deb sbcl_0.9.3.36.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.3.36.orig.tar.gz

1 0

[cl-debian] sbcl with sb-threads not compatible with 2.4 kernel
by Peter Van Eynde 12 Aug '05

12 Aug '05

Hi, It seems that even when in linux-os.c we test if futex'es work and we set linux_no_threads_p accordingly, something is calling futex_wait never the less. As the futex calls do _NO_ error checking this means the system then goes into a loop trying to call the futex call that fails over and over again. So: is 2.4 support dead or is this a bug? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

6 9

[cl-debian] Bug#317533: sbcl: still problems with 0.9.3.0-2
by Paul Visscher 10 Aug '05

10 Aug '05

Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.3.0-2 Followup-For: Bug #317533 I'm having the same problem that Emre has. I attached a copy of the strace(1) output, but I'm not sure that will be helpful. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.29skas3-epoll Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sbcl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.16 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sbcl-common 1:0.9.3.0-2 Architecture independent files for -- no debconf information --paulv

2 1